2nd Amendment still MIA in Maryland as federal judge refuses to support his own ruling

 by Doug Book,  staff writer

In early March, Federal Judge Benson Legg ruled unconstitutional the provision in Maryland law requiring a “good and substantial reason” be provided by anyone applying for a permit to carry a concealed weapon. Such a contingency “impermissibly infringes on the right to keep and bear arms” wrote the Judge in his opinion. (1)

The ruling had come down in the case of Woollard v Sheridan. In 2010, Plaintiff Raymond Woollard attempted to renew his permit to carry concealed but was refused because he had not provided to Maryland State Police “…sufficient evidence ‘to support apprehended fear’…”   therefore failing the “good and substantial reason” test. (2)

Judge Legg’s decision had literally introduced 2nd Amendment rights into one of the most liberal states in the nation. Previously a “may issue” state, meaning a license to carry a concealed weapon “may” be issued according to the mood of the Maryland State Police, residents would in future live in a “shall issue” state where permits must be issued upon demand to qualified (neither criminal nor mentally impaired) applicants.

“A citizen may not be required to offer a good and substantial reason why he should be permitted to exercise his rights. The right’s existence is all the reason he needs.” So wrote the Judge in his original opinion.  (2)

One month later, however, Judge Legg proved himself too cowardly to stand behind his own ruling. Granting a motion filed by liberal Maryland Attorney General Douglas Gansler, Legg stayed his earlier decision to uphold the Constitutional rights of Maryland residents until May 23rd when, upon hearing from both sides, he will decide whether to grant a permanent stay. As a result, the requirement to provide a “good and substantial reason” remains in force.

And upon what argument from the Attorney General did courageous Constitutional advocate Benson Legg base his decision to stay the 2nd Amendment rights of Maryland residents?

In the 2011, 4th Circuit case United States v Masciandaro, the majority ruled that law abiding citizens have the right to keep and bear arms, not just in the home—as Maryland would have it—but, within the bounds of the law, wherever they wished.  In short, law abiding Americans have the right to keep and bear arms. (3)

But although they concurred with the opinion, 2 of the judges hedged their decision with the following, pathetic drivel:  “…we do not wish to be even minutely responsible for some unspeakably tragic act of mayhem because in the peace of our judicial chambers we miscalculated as to Second Amendment rights.” (3)

Using this extraordinary example of judicial cowardice, the Maryland Attorney General suggested that if the stay were not granted by Judge Legg, “unspeakably tragic acts of mayhem” committed by the state’s concealed carry holders would somehow result and be on his head! In short, it is far too dangerous to permit Maryland citizens the free exercise of their God given and Constitutionally protected right to keep and bear arms.

On May 23rd, in the courtroom of federal Judge Benson Legg, residents of Maryland will discover whether or not they must continue to provide “good and substantial reason” before being permitted to exercise their 2nd Amendment rights.  

Should Barack Obama be given another 4 years of rule in Mordor on the Potomac, the Maryland requirement could soon extend to the exercise of speech, religion and assembly as well. Isn’t THAT something to look forward to.

Use this site to contact your Congressional Representative:


 To read more use these links:

 (1) http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/breaking/bs-md-handgun-law-20120305,0,3660988,full.story

(2) http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=50091

(3) http://monachuslex.com/?p=293

Have you answered this week’s CiR.com poll?

Get your copy of Coach’s new book: Crooks Thugs and bigots: the lost hidden and changed history of the Democratic Party at http://crooksthugsandbigots.com   

In this world you may have knowledge or you may have repose, but you may not have both.  What have you done today to deserve to live in America?

Comments on this or any other coachisright.com essay can be sent by following the posting instructions below.


Be Sociable, Share!

One thought on “2nd Amendment still MIA in Maryland as federal judge refuses to support his own ruling”

  1. For a State which has imposed upon the country such questionable luminaries as Barbara Mikulski, the squat uber-liberal Congressional Senator, one Socialist-type governor after another (with the possible exception of Michael Steel), and Spiro Agnew… this should come as no surprise, my friend.
    The backbone and starch has gone missing in an otherwise okay State…..(except for the poison ivy which abounds there).
    Washington looks at Maryland as a private fiefdom….Route 5, or the northern gateway to Pennsylvania Avenue…where many of the bureaucrats and worker-bees house themselves….
    God forbid that such a close neighbor to the 'Marxist Citadel on a shining hill' should be an entry point into the inner sanctum possessive of 2nd Amendment rights….
    Armed in Anacostia ? "Carrying concealed" in Clinton ? "Packing" in Olney? Bearing arms in Brandywine? Un-holstered in Upper Marlborough?
    Positively unthinkable for the weak and squeamish.
    I lived there too long to have any faith in its' return to liberty.
    Perhaps the judge will 'grow a pair' and prove me wrong….though I won't hold my breath.
    Good article though.

Comments are closed.