Alabama shows the way; tells the UN’s Agenda 21 Storm troopers to get lost

    

By Kevin “Coach” Collins

Any ideas the United Nations had about taking over the State of Alabama are gone. Both Houses of Alabama’s legislature unanimously passed Senate Bill 477 (SB 477) known around Montgomery as the “Due Process for Property Rights” Act and by doing so sent a loud and clear message to anyone wishing to impose United Nations control on Alabama to back off!

While almost no Democrat media cheerleader mentioned the bill, the law will likely become the model for get tough push back efforts against the cowards on the Left who want the United Nations to do the “dirty work” of putting America under international socialist law.  

 Using strong and specific language SB 477 orders all state agencies to refuse to cooperate in any UN scheme to subvert the sovereignty of Alabama. It says, “The State of Alabama and all political subdivisions may not adopt or implement policy recommendations that deliberately or inadvertently infringe or restrict private property rights without due process, as may be required by policy recommendations originating in, or traceable to ‘Agenda 21.’ ”

The insidious Agenda 21 has been using many non governmental organizations to work at the grass roots toward forcing World Government on the people of in many parts of the world.

Of course, as the law points out, the UN has enlisted a broad array of non-governmental and inter-governmental organizations in its effort to foist Agenda 21 on the world — most notably a Germany-based group called ICLEI, formerly known as the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives. But the new measure takes direct aim at that problem, too: “the State of Alabama and all political subdivisions may not enter into any agreement, expend any sum of money, or receive funds contracting services, or giving financial aid to or from” any such entities, as defined in Agenda 21 documents.

Although Agenda 21 has not passed the United States Senate, passing S B 477 with total bipartisan support makes it clear that Alabama doesn’t trust Senate Majority Leader Democrat Harry Reid not to ram it through a la Obamacare.

Alabamians are not fooled by Democrats’ subtlety deceptive “Smart Growth” or “Green jobs” schemes that insert federal funding tentacles into the sovereign State of Alabama’s affairs.  

 To contact your Congressional Representative use this link: http://www.contactingthecongress.org/

To read more use this link:

http://www.blacklistednews.com/Alabama_Adopts_First_Official_State_Ban_on_UN_Agenda_21/19864/0/38/38/Y/M.html

 Have you answered this week’s CiR poll yet?

Do you have something to say?  If you do and you want to be heard, coachisright.com may be your answer. CiR is a conservative Judeo/Christian site that demands links for everything you say except obvious opinion pieces.  

 If you can you reduce your thoughts to a cohesive 300 to 500 word essay send a writing sample to kcoachc@gmail.com .

 Follow Coach on Twitter: @KcoachcCoach

This day in history June 14

1777:  The Stars and Stripes is adopted by Congress as the Flag of the United States of America making this Flag Day.  

To read more about how Republicans Not Democrats have always been friends and supporters of African Americans get your  copy in Coach’s new book Crooks thugs and bigots the lost hidden and changed history of the Democratic Party at http://crooksthugsandbigots.com         

Have you answered this week’s CiR.com poll?

 In this world you may have knowledge or you may have repose, but you may not have both. 

What have you done today to deserve to live in America?

Comments on this or any other coachisright.com essay can be sent by following the posting instructions below.


Be Sociable, Share!

4 thoughts on “Alabama shows the way; tells the UN’s Agenda 21 Storm troopers to get lost”

  1. I want the governor of my State, Sean Parnell, (Alaska), to see this article…I also want my State legislature to see it .
    Anyone have any ideas how to go about doing this without using "snail mail" ? Most governmental offices do not allow for direct mailings of this article to them via e-mail….any suggestions??

Comments are closed.