Cowardly, pro-Obama judges a particular disgrace on this day

by Doug Book,  staff writer

“When men have died horrible deaths on foreign soil to protect the Constitution, can any man be forgiven when he ignores the Constitution to save his career?”  (1)

In late January, Liberty Legal Foundation lead attorney Van Irion argued before Georgia Administrative Judge Michael Malihi that Barack Obama was constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of president because he did NOT satisfy the Article II requirement of being a “natural born citizen” of the United States. Irion’s argument was based on precedent derived from an 1875 Supreme Court ruling which stated:

“The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.”  (2)

On February 3rd, Judge Malihi ignored this precedent of the 1875 court along with the language of the Constitution itself, claiming in a stunningly iniquitous ruling that Obama was indeed a natural born citizen and therefore eligible for the presidency, regardless of the fact his father was never a citizen of the United States. The contempt the judge displayed for ethical legal and judicial standards in arriving at this decision has been discussed at length by attorneys and lay people.

But attorney Irion has put the reprehensible conduct displayed by Judge Malihi and a number of his colleagues on the bench in terms far more important than those which describe only the legal improprieties. For three years, judges faced with the Obama eligibility question have been frightened into lawless decisions by the threat of negative repercussions to their judicial careers.

Yet as Irion writes,  “when you consider how many Americans have suffered and died to protect our Constitution, it is amazing…that so many judges are so selfish that they are unwilling to simply uphold their oath of office and acknowledge the truth.”  (1)

Countless Americans have exhibited the extraordinary courage and honor necessary to sacrifice, even die for their country and their heritage. But these qualities have become strangers to far too many in the American judiciary, causing citizens to lose all respect for both the meaning and rule of the law.

What a disgrace that judges are too cowardly to defend with a pen the nation and Constitution so many have died defending with a gun.

Use this site to contact your Congressional Representative:

To read more use these links:



Have you answered this week’s poll?

Get your copy of Coach’s new book: Crooks Thugs and bigots: the lost hidden and changed history of the Democratic Party at   

In this world you may have knowledge or you may have repose, but you may not have both.  What have you done today to deserve to live in America?

Comments on this or any other essay can be sent by following the posting instructions below.

Be Sociable, Share!

6 thoughts on “Cowardly, pro-Obama judges a particular disgrace on this day”

  1. This is hands down the most disgusting essay I have ever seen on this website. You misread the Minor case, you think a natural-born American citizen should be denied the right to run for President, you declare a viewpoint that no Judge has ever agreed with, you advance an agenda that no serious organization takes seriously, you have been victorious in over 100 court cases, and you post thses horrific words on Memorial Day.

    Absolutely reprehensible. Have you no shame at all?

    1. Gary,
      Always a pleasure to hear from you. The most pertinent language of the Minor case is included above. An individual born in the US of citizen parents is a natural born citizen. And Article II, Section 1 requires a president to be a natural born citizen. The Founders did not choose that language without care and purpose. Apparently you are suggesting that someone born in Moscow or Tehran of non-citizen parents could emigrate to the US, fulfill the requirements of citizenship and then become president. Do you honestly believe Madison, Adams and Co. would find that acceptable? Do you really think they considered there to be no difference between a naturalized citizen and a natural born citizen?
      Thanks for reading Coach is Right, Gary.


    2. Speaking of "misreading", what the hell are you talking about? No "natural born" citizen should be denied the right to run for President! Nothing in this essay comes close to saying that.
      Your ignorant comment is absolutely reprehensible. Have you no shame at all, or does it not bother you that our current occupant of the White House in no way meets the Constitutional requirements of the office? Having a non-citizen parent disqualifies you from the office, even if you were born on the White House steps!
      Memorial Day is the perfect day to point out the insult in the White House, and the sacrifice made by heros to keep such bastards, (yes, I believe he is a bastard child of the communist pedophile pornogropher, Frank Marshall Davis), from contaminating our country with their anti-American lies and policies.
      Ron Reale

  2. This so called essay is spot on and 100% right and to the point great work. Now for you mr miller you must be a guberment troll on obozos nut sack or you are just another sheeple that has been brain washed by the laimstream media no matter wich one you are you may very well find yourself and your lovedones in the hell that obozo has prepared for all of us if he is not thrown out of the W.H and all these unconstitutional excutive orders overturned and done away with.

  3. Gary Miller…….Show me.
    Write an essay and show me, point by point in answer to Doug Book's essay
    where he is wrong.
    Do not ramble on and off point with suggestive remarks show me with pointed facts.
    Don't just say something is wrong, show me how, and why it's wrong…….

Comments are closed.