Democrat Party says Obama doesn’t HAVE to be eligible to serve as President!

by Doug Book,  staff writer

Weary of defending in court the Constitutional eligibility of their boy at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, the Democrat Party has finally admitted Barack Obama is not qualified to be president of the United States– and that it doesn’t matter.  

According to a motion filed by Party attorneys in a Tennessee eligibility lawsuit, “…Defendants [the Tennessee Democrat Party and the Democrat National Committee] assert that the Tennessee Democrat Party has the right to nominate whoever it chooses to run as a candidate, including someone who is not qualified for the office.” (1)

In numerous previous lawsuits questioning the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama, Democrats have maintained that voters, not the Constitution, should be the final arbiters of presidential eligibility.  Though a disgraceful assertion on its face, such mindless rambling was about all desperate Democrat attorneys had in their arsenals, apart from the perpetually employed “plaintiffs lack standing” defense.

But now the cat is out of the bag and the true sentiments of Democrat Party officials have finally been aired. It seems that according to the left, as long as the acting president has the requisite contempt for the United States, is willing to work tirelessly to destroy the national economy and will ignore both the rule of law and his Constitutional duty to enforce it, he is eminently qualified to hold the country’s top job.

In February, Georgia Administrative Judge Michael Malihi ignored Supreme Court precedent, made a shambles of case law and distorted the rulings of other courts in a pathetically obvious mission to find Barack Obama eligible for the Georgia presidential ballot. Although the first judge to decide an Obama eligibility case on the merits, his contempt for an honest judicial process certainly did nothing to mend the rapidly deteriorating reputation of the American legal system.

On Wednesday, United States District Judge S. Thomas Anderson joined a long list of robed colleagues, ruling that plaintiffs in the Tennessee case “lacked standing” to point out Obama’s Constitutional ineligibility for the presidency. That is, plaintiffs could not claim sufficient personal harm should the Manchurian Candidate remain in or be re-elected to the White House.

Strange how the law works. After 3 ½ years of cynical disregard for the borders, language and culture of the United States, one would think some 240 million people have suffered “sufficient personal harm” to claim legal standing for a crack at His Royal Highness in a court of law! Only 30 million illegals currently residing in the United States and those the Attorney General refers to as “his people” might actually lack legal standing in the eyes of an honest arbiter.

At any rate, Democrats have finally admitted what the rest of us have known for quite some time. Barack Obama is NOT qualified to hold the job won for him by the national media in 2008. But it seems only the voters will have the authority to reclaim it from him. God willing, the vast majority who exercise that authority in November will be both American and alive.

Use this site to contact your Congressional Representative:

https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml

To read more use these links:

(1) http://www.scribd.com/doc/97824831/TN-WDTN-LLF-2012-06-21-Memorandum-ORDER-DISMISSING-CASE

Have you answered this week’s CiR.com poll?

Do you have something to say?  If you do and you want to be heard, coachisright.com may be your answer. CiR is a conservative Judeo/Christian site that demands links for everything you say except obvious opinion pieces.    If you can you reduce your thoughts to a cohesive 300 to 500 word essay send a writing sample to kcoachc@gmail.com.

Read how Democrats have always been enemies of freedom and the American way of life for ALL Americans in your copy of Coach’s new book: Crooks Thugs and bigots: the lost hidden and changed history of the Democratic Party available at: http://crooksthugsandbigots.com 

In this world you may have knowledge or you may have repose, but you may not have both.  What have you done today to deserve to live in America?

Comments on this or any other coachisright.com essay can be sent by following the posting instructions below.

 

Be Sociable, Share!

9 thoughts on “Democrat Party says Obama doesn’t HAVE to be eligible to serve as President!”

  1. Pingback: Anonymous
  2. So what? Republicans are considering Marco Rubio! Neither of his parents were citizens at the time of his birth. If Rubio was truly all people think, he would announce he is flattered to be considered, but ineligible due to a little thing called the Constitution.
    RR

    1. Republicans and Democrats are one in the same. Both parties are bought and paid for by corrupt business and banks. They are nothing but puppets for their masters. Rubbio is not eligible to serve as POTUS or VPOTUS. Neither of his parents were US citizens at the time of his birth, thus he is ineligible.

  3. If not, then why aren't American people, en masse, bringing criminal charges against Obummer for fraud, and impersonating a public official/President of the United States???????????????????????

    No Guts! No Glory!

    1. Only the house can bring impeachment charges against The POTUS and the Senate has the sole power to try the proceedings. Until this happens he's pretty much untouchable with Holder serving as AG. Unfortunately there isn't a pair of balls between the entire congress.

  4. To the Tennessee, and National Democratic parties….please define "not qualified"….as far as many of us believe , "The-liar-in-Chief" is neither LEGALLY eligible nor ethically, mentally and spiritually qualified to lead this country. You have now confirmed our primary tenet….
    My question to you collectivist idiots is why have you waited so long to "out" Obama ?….and do you think your revelations regarding his lack of legal provenance should matter LESS than it did in 2008??
    What I want to know is where will Obama and the Missus return after we roust him out of office in November ?
    Will it be Chicago or a town in Tennessee ?
    And, to the dishonorable judge who ruled that the citizenry does not possess legal standing because they have not been sufficiently injured by the pretenses and artifice of this lying bastard and most ignoble president….I can only hope that "The One" fully intends to make Tennessee his home after we send him packing….Let's see how you like having him on YOUR back door-step….mucking around with the politics, privileges, and priorities of your State….
    It's funny that we have the right to elect the SOB and the right NOT to re-elect him in November….but citizens don't "have standing" to demand that the rule of law be adhered to???
    What kind of court do you run? The Kangaroo variety??

  5. The direction of this country is absolutely frightening. There is going to be major civil unrest or mass secession. They should simply split the country – all the democrats on one side & all the republicans on the other.

Comments are closed.