Georgia case could determine whether Obama’s name may be placed on 2012 state ballot…ANY 2012 state ballot!

by Doug Book,  staff writer

 

 Americans have finally made the acquaintance of a judge who is willing to adhere to the demands of the Constitution and the laws he swore an oath to uphold upon taking office.

Georgia State Office of Administrative Hearings Judge Michael M. Malihi ruled this week that, as stated in Georgia law, “every candidate for federal office shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.” (1)

In his ruling, Mahili stated quite simply that “the court finds that the defendant (Barack Obama) is a candidate for federal office who has been certified by the state executive committee of a political party and therefore must, under Code Section 21-2-5, meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.” (1)

The suits which resulted in Malihi’s ruling were brought in response to Obama’s inclusion on the 2012 Georgia State primary ballot. And one of these complaints in particular might cause problems for the acting President of the United States.  

In October of last year, attorney Van R. Irion of the Liberty Legal Foundation filed lawsuits against the Democrat Party both in Tennessee and at the federal level, “…requesting injunctions prohibiting the Party from certifying that Obama is Constitutionally qualified to run for the office of President in the 2012 election.” (2)

 It was this same complaint that comprises the Georgia case for which a hearing is scheduled on January 26th.

Irion’s action has nothing whatever to do with the validity of the birth certificate Obama’s minions posted online last year. And the attorney doesn’t care whether Obama was born in Hawaii or not.

“The only fact relevant to this case,” says Irion, “is the fact that the defendant’s father was not a U.S. citizen.”  It is Irion’s contention that as Obama’s father was not born in the US and was never a citizen, Obama himself cannot meet the Constitutional standard requiring that a president be “natural born.”  (1)

Irion cites an 1875 Supreme Court ruling in which the court stated:

The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. (3)

If Irion is successful in obtaining an injunction preventing the Democrat Party from certifying Obama on the Georgia ballot, it will also act to prevent his Party certification and therefore appearance on ANY state ballot nationwide. (2)

Obama has spent a million bucks in legal fees to keep his personal history from the American public. Maybe this will be the one that gets him.

 

Use this site to contact your Congressional Representative:

https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml

 To read more use these links:  (1)  http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/court-obama-must-be-constitutionally-eligible/

                                                         (2) http://libertylegalfoundation.org/1209/no-certification-without-verification/

                                                         (3) http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/06/24/minor-v-happersett-is-binding-precedent-as-to-the-constitutional-definition-of-a-natural-born-citizen/

Further reading:  http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/farrar-v-obama.pdf

Have you answered this week’s CiR.com poll?

 In this world you may have knowledge or you may have repose, but you may not have both.  What have you done today to deserve to live in America?

 Comments on this or any other coachisright.com essay can be sent by following the posting instructions below.

Be Sociable, Share!

24 thoughts on “Georgia case could determine whether Obama’s name may be placed on 2012 state ballot…ANY 2012 state ballot!”

    1. Oh I don’t know, maybe until he shows a long form birth certificate that wasn’t obviously photoshopped – how’s that long enough?

      1. Obviously photoshopped? Coach, listen. A guy with a piss-poor logo with HORRIBLE drop-shadow effects and YouTube videos that look like they were filmed by Thomas Edison himself has no business evaluating the aesthetic qualities of a graphic.

        What do you need to see? Video of a young Barack emerging from his mother's womb with hula dancers and Don Ho in the background?

        1. Actually just the original long form birth certificate which, along with his entire personal history, Obama has spent so much time and money trying to keep hidden from the American public. In 2008, McCain produced some 1000 pages of medical records. Obama came up with a 4 paragraph letter from his doctor claiming he was just fine! Your boy is a cheat, a liar and a phony, Armand. But then as a leftist, what else could he be?

          1. Please folks, read the frigging article. Neither the birth certificate nor Obama's Hawiian birth are the point here. It is rather that Obama's father was not a U.S. citizen. Thus, by Supreme Court precedence, Obo is not a natural born citizen and not eligible to run for the presidency.

          2. Red herring. Immigrant parents are not the issue here. If your immigrant parents were naturalized citizens when they gave birth to you, then you qualify as a "natural born" citizen. Obama's father was never naturalized.

            The founders also grandfathered themselves into the constitution, since many were born in England. Please read Article 2, section 1 of the US Constitution:

            "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.. "

        2. Well his step grandmother in Kenya did just that – minus Don Ho etc. but she is no longer available to be interviewed. Before she became unavailable she was quoted as asking what all the fuss was about where your hero lil’ Barack was born since she saw him being born in Kenya. By the way if you think he was born here you might want to look at a bridge I have for sale in Brooklyn – but you can’t really believe that right I mean not really ? I didn’t think people who still thought that way were able to write. What a sucker! How funny; no really how funny; really you are that addle brained that you would believe that? Wow I really would someday like to meet you and bring you to an institution where they study people like you. You’re too funny! One more time you don’t really believe that he was born in Hawaii do you? Do your people laugh at you to your face when say you believe he was born here?
          Please tell the people at the home to keep reading CiR to you. Maybe whatever you have can be cured.

        3. Armand : Get a life, and while you're trying to find one, please stay out of obviously Conservative web sites.
          Isn't the Obama controlled media enough for you socialist chuckleheads? Go pester someone else.

    2. Yo Rusty…read the message to Armand ! If Obama's roving, continent hopping, womanizer of a father is a "Naturalized American", then I'm Helen of Troy !

  1. @Rusty Shucklehead

    The "long form birth certificate" allegedly proffered by Ubama was a PDF file.

    A PDF file is not a birth certificate.

    Try getting a passport with a PDF file. Or a driver's license, for that matter.

    But it's good enough to be President, eh Skippy?

  2. Coach,
    I hope you're right again, but for my part, I no longer have any faith in the Judicial system to decide this case with impartiality.
    I see the judge hearing this case as a ploy to legitimize Obama by "hearing" the evidence and then deciding he is "Eligible".
    I hope I am wrong, but we shall see.
    ELmo

    1. I hope you're wrong too. Malihi refused the motion filed by Obama's attorney to dismiss the case. Maybe that's a good sign. It's a shame the Founders didn't define "natural born" in the Constitution, but they probably didn't figure they HAD to! It was simply a given to these men that 2 American parents equaled a natural born American citizen.

      1. If Malihi dismissed the case, it would be back to square one where the Obama survives but the case has NOT been heard in a Court on it's merits. If Malihi hears the case and decides for Obama, then it's a different ballgame. The case will have been heard on it's merits and decided in Obama's favor. Again – I hope I'm totally wrong but I so distrust the judicial system after all of this…
        ELmo

  3. Pingback: Anonymous
  4. Immigrant parents are not the issue here. If your immigrant parents were naturalized citizens at the time of your birth on US soil, then you are a "natural born" US citizen, of blood and soil.

    Our founders grandfathered themselves to be eligible for the presidency, since many were English subjects. See Article 2, section 1 of the US Constitution.

    "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.."

    The original B.C. may or may not exist. It is merely a clever misdirection by Obama and a fawning media to ignore the real issue of his "natural born" status.

    Google "Obama Keyes debate natural born". When confronted by Allan Keyes about his "natural born" status during a 2004 senatorial debate, Obama stated that it didn't matter that he was not natural born, since he "wasn't running for president". His law school days taught him that much.

Comments are closed.