If Georgia Sec. of State knocks Obama off the ballot it will destroy down ballot Democrats

By Kevin “Coach” Collins

If Georgia’s Secretary of State says Obama is off the ballot it will set in motion a scary domino effect that will devastate down ballot Democrats.  

It’s doubtful that the media will explain what is likely to happen if there is a blank space at the top of the Democrat slate in Georgia next November, but here’s a likely scenario.  

The results the latest IBD/TIPP survey hold nothing but bad news for Obama and his Democrats. Almost 2 /3 of the respondents agreed we are preparing for the most important election since 1860.  Even in the absence of hard evidence, can there be any doubt those who are disinterested and feel no sense of urgency about this election probably have very little connection to our America except as a place to demand from to pay for their America?  

“Voter Interest” in this election can rightly be used interchangeably with “voter intensity” which in turn translates to “voter enthusiasm” to vote.   

Last March Republican enthusiasm was 5 points higher than Democrat enthusiasm, but that difference had grown to a 21 point edge in an October CNN survey.

CNN found 64% of Republicans are either extremely or very enthusiastic about voting in November which was up 3 points from June. Democrats by contrast had just a 43% enthusiasm level as they looked forward to voting in November.  

These kinds of numbers are the stuff of titanic defeats for Democrats.

A 2010 enthusiasm edge of 19 points at 63/44 for Republicans gave them pickups of  680 state level legislative seats and 64 Congressional seats.  

Today’s IBD/TIPP survey shows Republicans 26 points more enthusiastic than Democrats with no telling how far the gap will grow.  Clearly getting rank and file Democrats out to vote for Barack Obama or anyone other Democrat  will be a very uphill battle.   

Very dangerous territory for Democrats

A December Gallup mega survey of 5000 voters in 12 swing states revealed non White enthusiasm was 32%. Compared to  2008 when 65% of Blacks voted  97% for Obama this is a stunning number.  

If Black enthusiasm to vote is already less than half 2008 levels  one has to wonder how many Blacks will turn out to vote for ANY Democrat without Obama at the top of their ticket? 

If the Obama Citizenship cases in other states are successful it will  be a disaster for down ballot Democrats like never before.

To contact your Congressional Representative use this link:http://www.contactingthecongress.org/

To read more use these links:

http://news.investors.com/Article/599238/201201271850/most-important-election-ever-intense-republican-voters.htm

http://hotair.com/archives/2011/10/17/cnn-poll-shows-rapidly-widening-voter-enthusiasm-gap/

http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/251927/gallup-2010-enthusiasm-gap-roughly-double-1994-2006

 Have you answered this week’s CiR.com poll?

This day in history January 31

1865 Over the unanimous opposition of House Democrats, a Republican controlled Congress passed the 13th Amendment which abolished slavery.  

“Don’t miss our new 3 minute “audiotorial” produced by Without a Helmet: On the Line with Emmett & Wiley.  Hear it now by clicking the play button on their logo on the lower right of my homepage!   

In this world you may have knowledge or you may have repose, but you may not have both. 

What have you done today to deserve to live in America?

 Comments on this or any other coachisright.com essay can be sent by following the posting instructions below

Be Sociable, Share!

13 thoughts on “If Georgia Sec. of State knocks Obama off the ballot it will destroy down ballot Democrats”

  1. Judge Malihi about to lower the boom on Barack?

    When is the decision to be made and if he is knocked off the ballot can his lawyers do something about it ?

    1. Maureen I am Praying they can not be able to do anything about it. They failed to produce him, and he was told by the Judge that he was to be there. Kind of funny how he snubs his nose in front of the laws. I feel he is saying he is and please excuse this MOVIE reference here—-"ABOVE THE LAW". I am getting sick of this piece of human scum telling everybody else what to do through his stupid czars, and he is self exempt through all the federal laws of the land. Oh less just say to H— with the Constitution, and throw it out to make him happy for all time. My grandmother was full blooded Cherokee native, and what I am saying that for is to tell you this word—"WADO"—which in Cherokee language means "THANK YOU", and I say that so that you will know I deeply thank you for your love of your country.

    2. Maureen,

      Malihi has given parties until Feb 5th to have all evidence, etc to the court. His decision will come sometime after that date. It will then go to the Georgia Secretary of State, Brian Kemp for a final ruling on Obama's ballot eligibility.

      Naturally Obama's lawyers will file appeals or take matters to a higher Georgia court, I would think. No idea what Ga. law allows them to do. But I do believe this will remain a STATE matter. I don't believe Obama can take the decision to a federal court, but don't quote me.
      And thanks much for reading and commenting on Coach is Right.

      1. The date has been moved up to Feb 1st.

        Judge gave everybody final arguments, he will then rule shorly after that.

  2. As critical as it is to get B.O. out of office….and that IS our prime motivation at present….it is equally as critical that the person who replaces (As Maureen, above, has so aptly termed him, "this piece of human scum"), HAS to be committed to a return of Constitutional ethics and practices…and so far, the ONLY one speaking about such a return is Ron Paul….Now THAT, folks, is very, I mean extremely, scary.
    In all of these Republican Presidential Debates have ANY of these candidates been asked specific questions regarding Constitutional issues? Have they ever been asked to rate their own careers as this Country's leaders, based upon the Constitutionality of their legislative actions? Have any one of them been asked if they believe in the Constitutional limitations placed upon their powers ? What is the extent of their regard and respect for the provisions guaranteeing the rights and freedoms of LEGITIMATE American Citizens???
    Most every single candidate remaining on the "stump" would fail miserably, both in the Constitutionality of their actions and also in the protection of of OUR freedoms.
    If these questions were ever asked of the candidates, I certainly do not remember their occurrence.
    The point I wish to strongly emphasize is this:
    Are we so eager to replace "The-Caliph-in-Chief-taking-up-valuable-space-in-the-WH" that we will willingly turn our backs upon the very issues which birthed the TEA Party movement?
    Yes, we are sick and tired of being taxed to death. Yes, we are sick and tired of being lied to and trod upon like dirt under all those Presidential and Congressional boots…but what in the bloody Hell are we doing to INSIST that the next "leader" (and I use that term loosely), isn't every bit as Machiavellian, Egoistic, prone to cheap political banalities and slights of hand, "legacy"-driven, over- eager to deliver cop-outs, hand-outs, and bail-outs, and up to his political ass in graft as well as threats against the God-Given, Constitutional, and Bill of Rights protections of American's Freedoms as this repulsive, pissant President has been !!
    It's ironic that if you're poor, black, or Muslim in Obama's kingdom, you won't do well but you won't be hurt anywhere near as badly as those folks who are paying for the entitlement programs and favoritisms he has granted ……A majority of Americans lost both our hard earned dollars and our rights and freedoms simply so that Obama could offer them to your groups and needs . Obama acts the Hero to you while we are forced to support this fraud.
    Think ahead ! What will happen to all those entitlements you enjoy when Taxpayers say…..WE'VE HAD ENOUGH.??
    There aren't enough jails or prisons in this country to hold those of us who are disgusted and ready to revolt against what Congress and Obama have done to this country.
    At election time, Dear Voters, carefully pick your poison from among the toxic candidates.

    1. IF Ron Paul is such an avid Constitutionalist, then WHERE IS HIS CONDEMNATION OF OBAMA as a usurper of the POTUS ??

      Or is Ron no better than anyone else in his circle of Candidates, in Congress or the Judiciary who has let this obvious usurper perpetuate his perfidious behavior, going on 4+ years??

      IF and WHEN Ron steps up and speaks out will any of we RP detractors begin to even listen to him, especially his declarations of Constitutional honesty to the public, let alone himself.

      1. Paleophlatus : I don't know the answer to your first paragraph question…. that is something which Rep. Paul, or his campaign, would have to answer for you. To date, I have resisted the impulse to become a "Paulbot"….but unless our current cast of Repub.presidential candidates begin to come forward with specific observations and examples about the lack of Constitutionality within the three main branches of government, along with specific measures which WILL( not "may", "ought-to", or "shall be"), be taken against all those who breach Constitutional laws in lieu of their own expedient interpretations….be they Congressional , Court types, or presidential abusers….Our country, and we, will ALL be in a world of hurt and will have to suffer the consequences of "government as usual".
        The destruction of our country and its' rule of law; the financial abuse and disenfranchisement of our citizenry, and other disharmonious aspects in the non-preferential treatment of ALL of America's races…has GOT to stop.
        Paleo…I don't care who your candidate is…if he doesn't meet this Constitutional criteria…I will not vote for him.
        Makes little difference to me whether our country meets its' demise at the hands of Marxist Democrats or Socialist-leaning Republicans, the tragedy will be as great.

  3. DO NOT CENSOR THIS POSTING!

    The issue is quite simple. To be President of the USA or to run for the Presidency of the USA, Obama must be a "natural born citizen" according to the Constitution of the USA. The term "natural born citizen" has been defined previously and it requires two conditions:
    1) Obama must be born in the USA.
    Obama's long form birth certificate that Obama has provided through the White House web site HAS BEEN DECLARED BY MANY EXPERTS TO BE SIMPLY A FORGERY!!!

    —Just a few links on the forged birth certificate that Obama released through the White House web site for those interested:
    –"Obama Birth Certificate Faked In Adobe Illustrator – Official Proof 1 ( Layers )" at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s9StxsFllY
    –"Adobe book editor positive: Obama certificate is phony" at http://www.wnd.com/2011/06/316749/
    –"Experts: Registrar stamps confirm Obama forgery" at http://www.wnd.com/2011/07/324153/
    –See evidence that Obama forged the birth certificate that was posted on the White House servers on 27 April 2011 (!!) at http://www.scribd.com/collections/3166684
    –See evidence that Obama is using a Social Security Number (SSN) 042-68-4425 that was not legally issued to him but to someone else (!!) at http://www.scribd.com/collections/3260742

    —Therefore, the only way to check this long form birth certificate is to go to Hawaii to check it directly. In particular, it is indispensable to assess if even this original long form birth certificate in Hawaii is truly genuine that is if it is not also a forgery to cover up for the possible fact that Obama might never have been born in Hawaii!!!

    2) Obama's parents MUST BOTH be American citizens.
    We know that Obama's father was a Kenyan and that he NEVER was an American citizen!!!!!
    Therefore, THIS SECOND CONDITION ALONE DISQUALIFIES OBAMA TO RUN FOR THE PRESIDENCY OF THE USA AND IT ALSO DISQUALIFIES OBAMA TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE USA, NO MATTER THE FACT THAT HE WON THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION!!!!!!

    CONCLUSION:
    —Obama is NOT a natural born citizen and therefore he is not entitled to run for the Presidency of the USA nor is he entitled to be President of the USA, no matter the fact that he won the Presidential election!!!!
    —Finally, Obama is a former lawyer and therefore OBAMA CONSCIOUSLY, INTENTIONALLY COMPLETELY DECEIVED THE ENTIRE AMERICAN PEOPLE BY RUNNING FOR THE PRESIDENCY OF THE USA WHEN HE KNEW PERFECTLY WELL THAT HE WAS NOT ENTITLED TO DO SO SIMPLY BECAUSE HE KNEW VERY WELL THAT HE WAS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, AS THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA REQUIRES ONLY ON THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA!!!!
    —THIS HUGE DECEPTION IS MORE THAN A FRAUDULENT ACT, IT IS WORSE THAN ANYTHING IMAGINABLE BECAUSE:
    1) IT RELATES TO THE HIGHEST POSITION IN THE LAND, THE PRESIDENCY OF THE USA, THAT OBAMA HAS FRAUDULENTLY OBTAINED;
    2) IT RELATES TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA BEING TRAMPLED UPON FRAUDULENTLY AND ILLEGALLY BY OBAMA;
    3) IT RELATES TO THE FACT THAT OBAMA INTENTIONALLY DECEIVED AND MISLED THE ENTIRE AMERICAN PEOPLE!!!
    ANY PERSON GUILTY OF SUCH SERIOUS FRAUD SHOULD AT LEAST GET A JAIL SENTENCE, NO MATTER THAT OBAMA HAS FRAUDULENTLY HELD THE POSITION OF PRESIDENT OF THE USA FOR A PERIOD OF TIME!!!

    DEFINITION OF A "NATURAL BORN CITIZEN":
    If you really want to have an expert legal explanation on what a "natural born citizen" truly is according to the Constitution of the USA and why legally speaking it is this way, then I suggest that you read at least a few articles on Attorney Mario Apuzzo's web site "Natural Born Citizen – A Place to Ask Questions and Get the Right Answers" at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
    IN PARTICULAR, MAKE SURE YOU READ:
    —"The Natural Born Citizen Clause of Our U.S. Constitution Requires that Both of the Child’s Parents Be U.S. Citizens At the Time of Birth" at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/natural-born-ci

    1. You are wrong. First, the outcome of the Georgia case demonstrates that. A Republican judge in a Republican state smacked down this joke of a lawsuit.

      This is easy, neither condition is correct, but i'll address the second one wherein you state that a person has to be born to both American parents. Not only does your interpretation rely on a dated foreign interpretation of law, but it also fails to consider that six other previous presidents would be ineligible under that standard. Wilson, Coolidge, and others wouldn't have qualified based on your incorrect interpretation. Wouldn't this issue have come up then if that theory was the case?

Comments are closed.