Coach is Right Archives

If Obama has no Natural Born Citizenship problem why did Congress try to fix it?

 

By Suzanne Eovaldi, staff writer

  Congress made eight different attempts to alter our U.S. Constitution concerning the Natural Born Citizenship Clause according to the apocalyptic video documentary done with research by Senior Pastor Carl Gallups proving they knew Barack Obama lacked presidential eligibility prior to the 2008 election!  If there was no problem for Obama why would these people do this? There had never been a question of Natural Born Citizenship in our lifetimes!  Why fix what wasn’t broken?

  The youtube video goes on to reveal a secret, closed door meeting was held with eight Supreme Court Justices just prior to the January 2009 Inauguration that sent our other courts an unspoken message to don’t go there. Plaintiff attorneys with cases were pending at the time were not allowed into this meeting!  Only Justice Samuel Allito declined to attend this secret meeting.

  Here, as revealed in the Gallups video, are the eight different attempts to amend our Constitution to accommodate Obama’s eligibility questions: 

1. On June 11, 2003: House Joint Resolution # 59, introduced by Rep. Vic Snyder (D-AR), failed to obtain a vote; it sought to allow non-natural born U.S. citizens, “but who have been citizens of the U.S. for at least 35 years,” to serve as President or Vice President.

2. On Sept. 3, 2003: Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) introduced HJR#67 which would have lowered to only 20 years the citizen requirement.  It, too, failed to make an official vote.

 3. On Feb. 25, 2004, Sen. Don Nickles (R-OK) failed in his attempt to deflect this obvious attack on our Constitution by introducing Senate Bill 2128 which failed on merit. 

 4. On Sept. 15, 2004, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, (R-CA), submitted House Joint Resolution 104 that required only a 20 year citizenship but no NBC status; it subsequently failed.

  5. On Jan. 4, 2005, the Conyers HJR 02 failed in its attempt to push through the Rohrabacher 20 year eligibility bill. 

 6. On Feb. 1, 2005, Rohrabacher submitted a revised version of his 20 year citizenship requirement, (without the NBC stipulation) with HJR 15.

  7. On April 14, 2005, Snyder reintroduced HJR # 42, requiring 35 years of being a U.S. citizen.  Had this resolution passed, Barack Obama just barely would have been eligible in 2005.

 8. On Feb. 28, 2008, Sen. Claire McCaskill, (D-MO) attempted to add language onto SB 2678, Children of the Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act, to again weaken the NBC clause.  Co-sponsors of the failed legislation were Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama!.  By the way, was not the John McCain eligibility hearing really a head fake to draw attention away from the Democrats’ elephant in the room?

    “This is  (a) 100 times worse situation (than Watergate); this is a crime against the Constitution and all the people of the U.S. Obama is not who he says he is, ” says Charles Kerckner whose eligibility lawsuit was turned down by our Supreme Court.

   Meanwhile, the just announced Birthers Summit in March is taking shape as ordinary citizens continue to push forward against the Code of Silence by our Media and the refusal of redress by our elected officials.  Georgia Judge Michael Malihi who was the lone judicial representative giving light to the Obama eligibility question has also run away from the issue with his ruling last Friday.

 An Obama contempt of court motion was filed on docket this week for his failure to honor the judge’s order to appear, but  Judge Malihi will certainly not enforce it. 

Pictures of Obama waving widely to campaign crowds in Las Vegas and Colorado at the time of the Malihi hearing add to surreal nightmare posed by this outrage.

To contact your Congressional Representative use this link: http://www.contactingthecongress.org/

To learn more use these sources :

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3aCfR8rmrw

http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2011/07/congress-knew-obama-was-ineligiblesix.html

http://www.birthersummit.org/register.html/

 Have you answered this week’s CiR.com poll?

This day in history Feb 5

1937: Trying a usual sneaky Democrat stunt to subvert the Constitution, Franklin Roosevelt announces his plan to add six stooges to the Supreme Court who would rubber stamp his socialist agenda. It failed because the overwhelming Democrat Congress defeated it out of fear of a backlash. They were right; in 1938 they suffered huge losses at the polls.

The lesson here is that America is a center right country and those who try to force socialism down our throats do so at their own peril. 

“Don’t miss our new 3 minute “audiotorial” produced by Without a Helmet: On the Line with Emmett & Wiley.  Hear it now by clicking the play button on their logo on the lower right of my homepage!   

In this world you may have knowledge or you may have repose, but you may not have both. 

What have you done today to deserve to live in America?

 Comments on this or any other coachisright.com essay can be sent by following the posting instructions below.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter

Related posts:

  1. Does Obama’s long form birth certificate clear him or prove he’s not a natural born citizen?
  2. What witnesses testified to at Obama’s Georgia citizenship hearing
  3. A Natural Born American? Obama´s energy policy suggests otherwise
  4. Is Obama’s defeat written in the stars?
  5. Not the media the Democrats or the Republicans will challenge Obama’s eligibility so we have to

24 comments to If Obama has no Natural Born Citizenship problem why did Congress try to fix it?

  • Jerry

    What Judge Malihi did in Georgia is treason. But he's not the first nor will he be the last who will give up their integrity and their honor to keep Obama the usurper in office. This is no longer a nation ruled by law but a nation ruled by the lawless.

    • thestorm

      The Judge that was murdered in AZ.when Gifford was injured had a case pending against bho.Coincidence?
      What will Sheriff Joe & his team do?Are their & their families lives at risk?Will we ever know?
      A corrupt government has no shame.

  • wheatenlover

    What can one add to this audacity? It shows a criminal compliance at the highest levels for our constitution and the general rule of law. There is nowhere else to go with our outrage except to the streets. I am deeply concerned for our country and the people who walk our land.

  • Richard M

    Well, after reading this article, we know who the traitors are! Not to mention those other traitors on the Supreme Court, with the exception of Samuel Allito. If we want to save our country, we need to expose this treasonous activity on the part of those that were trying to make amendments to the Constitution so in ineligible foreing asset could hold the office of POTUS!

    It looks to me like we need another House Committee on Un-American Activities. Sen. Joe McCarthy knew way back in his day, how there were communists infiltrating into our govt and society. Since the SCOTUS is in on it, these pukes need to be arrested for treason! We cannot have a free society, a free market, or anything resembling what our Founding Fathers have passed down to us as long as we have these traitors amongt us.

    Thank you so much Suzanne Eovaldi and the Coach of course, for this information. This needs to go viral. There really is no recourse left for the people. It looks like the only option at this stage is a military coup or an outright citizens revolt. When we have treason going on at the highest levels, there will be no justice.

    Looks like Nikita Khruschev was right when he said America will fall like ripe fruit into our hands, without a single shot being fired. I'd like to know when he knew it and how!

    I've been railing on for years to my friends and family and on blogs about all the illegality of our own govt. How the screws are slowly being turned on the American people. Well, folks, it looks like they found their man in Obama and if he gets another 4 years, watch out! Soon, you will not be able to speak up and say what's on your mind. That won't be allowed! Oh, and you think those FEMA camps are for terrorists, well they are, but they've been built for you and me, the American citizens who'll be considered terrorists for not laying down and keeping your mouths shut.

    I'm a Christian and I know the Bible talks about a one world govt and I know that there can never be a true one world govt without America being a part of it. I don't know if we still have time to save our country, but at least we should go down fighting. After all, that's what our Founding Fathers did, it's the least we can do for what they've given us.

    I tremble for my country and my countrymen! We've been duped by the enemy right here on our own soil, and the terrorists are our own govt!

    • Joanneo

      Yes, you are so right on all points. Our government is full of the one world order members. We cannot survive as long as we continue to to vote them into office, and for the past two or three decades we have had no choice, they have all been NWO. This time we have ONE running for office that is not a member of that group. He is the one the media never mentions, rarely mentioned on the internet except in comments, Ron Paul. They use all excuses why we should not vote for him while touting Newt and Mitt. Yes, we will have another president that will sell us down the river and this time 90% of us will be headed for the Fema camps and the micro wave ovens. (they have improved on Hitlers gas ovens).How many years have they been building these concentration camps? They did not spring up over nite. It would be interesting to know which of our presidents started them. Vote Ron Paul……

    • nik

      wow, all it took was this one article to make the truth wide open! I laugh at those who believe they have an understanding of what the hell is going on with those people who DO pull the puppet strings! And take your unfounded belief systems and toss ‘em, because it’s all been a sham!

  • Justie

    These people are puppets. What I would like to know is who is pulling their strings.

  • Oldpuppymax

    Actually, Suzanne, Obama HAS no "natural born citizen" problem as long as judges are dishonest and Republican politicians are cowards!

    I used to be concerned about Obama's legitimacy and eligibility. NOW I'm MOST worried about our elected Republican officials raising no challenge should Hussein declare himself KING!

    • Joanne Edmiston

      Doug, I guess the only hope that freedom-craving Americans have is that the U.S. Supreme Court gave Obama no OTHER assurances…
      That our government is so concerned that it could not survive the inconvenience of "outing" an illegal President tells me that I can no longer trust any faction of America's government or court system to protect me from ANYTHING…that this "trust thing" is only a one-way illusion meant to insure that we do not revolt against the tyranny and collusion we have been experiencing because of the "hand-holding" extant between the branches of government.
      To have so little faith that Americans WOULDN'T or COULDN'T come to grips with such a monumental screw-up (on top of the scam Obama has pulled), tells me that we actually ARE nothing more to our branches of government than pesky field-mice which aren't capable of surviving without their interference or "false protections"…. Give me an open field….not one hemmed in by Federal agencies, red-tape, bureaucratic intransigence, and threats of personal peril…. and I'll show you how nicely we field mice will survive without you and how effectively we can level the playing field for our benefit.
      The capitol Building and Offices could burn to the ground tomorrow..and we'd do just fine without them while we set about restoring a more respectable, responsive, and rational form of government than the crap we've been receiving to date.

  • B. Johnson

    "Congress made eight different attempts to alter our U.S. Constitution concerning the Natural Born Citizenship Clause …" –Coach Collins

    With all due respect to Coach Collins, if I understand the coach correctly, Congress cannot alter or amend the Constitution. Only the states can ratify proposed amendments to the Constitution as evidenced by Article V of the Constitution.

    • Coach Collins

      B. Johnson
      Congress provides the legislation to be voted on or we would have 50 or 57 (depending upon whether we listened to Obama or not) different versions to vote on.
      Coach

      • B. Johnson

        Good point Coach. The Founding States were also concerned about winding up with different proposals from the states for an amendment to the Constitution. That's why the States included a provision in Article V which requires Congress to call for a Constitutional Convention when the states propose an amendment to Constitution. A Constitutional Convention requires the states to agree on one proposed amendment instead of 50 (or Obama's 57) different proposals.

  • B. Johnson

    Regarding major problems concerning Obama's citizenship qualification to be president, please consider the following.

    The constitutional term, "natural born citizen," was a term that the drafters of the Constitution evidently borrowed from the Law of Nations, a legal reference being used at the time. In fact, Clause 10 of Section 8 of Article I of the Constitution mentions the Law of Nations. The Law of Nations indicates the following about natural-born citizenship.

    Book I, Chapter 19, section 212:

    § 212. Citizens and natives.

    "The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens." –Emerich de Vattel, Law of Nations http://www.constitution.org/vattel/vattel_01.htm

    Also, note that John Bingham, the main author of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment, had reflected on the definition of natural-born citizen in the Law of Nations, officially clarifying what a natural-born citizen is in the congressional record on at least two occasions.

    “I find no fault with the introductory clause, which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen; …" –John Bingham, 1866. http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&… (see top half of second column)

    “All from other lands, who by the terms of [congressional] laws and a compliance with their provisions become naturalized, are adopted citizens of the United States; all other persons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, are natural born citizens." –John Bingham, 1862. http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&… (see bottom half of 1st column)

    So given that all three references indicate to various extents that the parents of a natural-born citizen cannot owe allegiance to a foreign sovereignty when that citizen is born, and given that Obama's official and highly controversial birth certificate clearly indicates that Obama' father was not a US citizen, Obama cannot be a natural-born citizen, and is therefore not constitutionally qualified to be president.

  • Gayle

    A local talk show host had Orley Taitz on yesterday. Go to the website to listen. We have to involve ourselves by calling the Georgia Secretary of State to insist that this decision be appealed. The host reads a compelling review of the evidence. This starts at about 11 minutes in. Well worth listening to. Then share. We only have until TOMORROW!!!! What are YOU willing to do today?
    http://str8talk.wordpress.com/

  • [...] Coach Is Right - Coach is indeed right! Hit these links: 1 2 Now the Free Republic link to the story. This is an active debate begun on January 31, 2012 From comment #10, “EVERY IMPORTANT—SUNDAY NIGHT” I doubt there will be a revelations from Faux News that will matter because everyone in all three branches of our government are “in the tank” so-to-speak to guarantee the avoidance of confronting this issue. This commenter sums in up in a nutshell, “There are only two types of citizenship classes defined in the U.S. Constitution. It is clear that a Natural Born Citizen is NOT a Citizen of the United States. All citizens within the jurisdiction of the United States have the same rights under the Constitution. All except one right, and that is the right to be eligible to the position of the President of the United States. The Supreme Court can be overly-verbose in its definitions until paper runs out in Washington. Nothing will change this simple, elegant fact. 36posted on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 10:49:47 PMby devattel [...]

  • Suzanne Eovaldi

    many, many thanks for your comments/very few stories in my career have literally made me physically sick to write and this was one of them/in fact, I walked away from the keyboard/ but, no, I told myself. go back/ this story of the NBC clause must be told over and over/someone, somewhere will do something officially for our country/ Sincerely, Suzanne

  • Oldpuppymax

    Liberty Legal has made an interesting observation–this being the first time anyone has actually ruled on the EVIDENCE in one of these suits, an appeal can now be filed. And rest assured Van Irion and probably others will be doing just that. Liberty states the judge made clear errors in legal interpretation…at least 3 per the brief article just posted on their site.

  • Bob Weber

    None of the proposed constitutional amendments or legislation you cited applied in any way to Obama. The amendments would have broadened eligibility to include a long-time naturalized citizen such as Arnold Schwarzenegger. They did not propose to alter the definition of "natural born citizen". McCaskill's proposed law would have been redundant, as those born overseas to U.S. parents are already citizens at birth by statute law, regardless of reasons for being abroad, except that it would have explicitly declared them to be NBS's, which by actual practice is already the case. See John McCain.

    • Joanne Edmiston

      To Bob Weber…please cite the documentation for your assertion that "none of the proposed constitutional amendments….applied in any way to Obama".
      It is definitely "uncool" to make such a statement without back-up…sounds more to me like opinion than actual fact.

  • Gary Miller

    You birthers are adorable.

    • Coach Collins

      Yes don’t you just love the quaint little folk ways we have like following the Constitution and loving our country? It must be great fun for the suave sophisticated crowd to watch us working to pay the taxes to pay for your special projects.
      Thanks for the compliment
      Coach

  • Bob Weber

    Joanne Edmiston: Unless you have some evidence that Obama is a naturalized citizen, which would be a matter of public record, the proposed Constitutional amendments extending eligibility to long-time naturalized citizens would not apply to Obama. Likewise, he was not born to Americans serving in the military, so McCaskill's proposed law would not apply. You're welcome.

  • Carol,AZ

    …and I sent updates to Foxs News for expousre …a complete black out from all main stream press.
    What if thousands of us emailed all media outlet until we melted the system down.
    We can't ignore this America

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>