Our John Roberts problem is inconceivable


By Kevin “Coach” Collins

Monday, without comment (because he could not make a coherent one),  Chief Justice John Roberts denied a request by the Association of American Physicians & Surgeons and the Alliance for Natural Health USA for a stay in the implementation of Obamacare. The groups had made their application last Friday arguing that since the bill had been declared a tax by the Supreme Court with Justice Roberts himself the deciding vote, and it had originated in the Senate where the Constitution says revenue bills may not originate, the law was therefore unconstitutional and implementation of Obamacare  should at least be stayed pending further examination.

While there are other minor issues attached to the application that were also not addressed the truth of the matter is clear: John Roberts will never do anything to derail Obamacare no matter what arguments against it are brought before him.

There is very good reason to believe that regardless of the media’s skillful smothering of the story, John Roberts is being blackmailed to make certain Obamacare never falls in a Supreme Court case. The basis of this charge surrounds the fact that a series of strange and probably felonious acts are attached to the adoption of his two children.

In 2005 when it thought it was doing the Democrats’ bidding, the New York Times dug into apparently easily accessible records and found that the children Roberts and his wife adopted in “South America” started life as Irish citizens. This is a red flag. The laws of Ireland regarding adoptions are very clear: adoptions by non-citizens are prohibited as are private adoptions.

Apparently when the Democrats realized they could control a Supreme Court Justice’s vote through blackmail over his having committed a number of international crimes the Times pulled back and dropped its investigation. The Democrat paper of record pulled back because it didn’t want to ” break the seal of an adoption case” – as if violating laws ever means anything to Democrats in their quest for power. Keep in mind Barack Obama’s violation of his opponents “sealed” divorce records propelled him to a US Senate seat.

What does the Roberts problem mean for the average American who looks to Washington for relief from Democrat oppression? It means we won’t be getting any relief from the Roberts’ Court at any time in his lifetime.





Be Sociable, Share!

6 thoughts on “Our John Roberts problem is inconceivable”

  1. @Coach–

    I know that everyone is looking for some blackmail deal on Roberts, but how is this adoption thing a “secret” anymore? It’s been all over the Internet for a long time.

    Why don’t people just accept the fact that he is a scumbag, and leave it at that? My first impression of him—which has never changed—is that he is a little kiss-ass apple and resume polisher, who will do whatever he can to please his betters.

  2. Justice Roberts is a pitiful, spineless, piece of nothing masquerading as chief justice of our highest court. But the big question is what sort of government do we have which allows a worm like Roberts to overturn the will of millions of Americans? Or for that matter, any lawyer in black robes to do the same? Whatever happened to “We The People?”

  3. Roberts has something in his past that the liberals know and is holding over his head. Someone needs to search his background more closely and maybe impeach or find a way to remove him. He may have just disguised himself that well. He has no guts for sure!

  4. And the Obama machine told Roberts: either you play along with Obamacare, or we will make sure that your cute little designer children get shipped back to whatever dreary Belfast orphanage you illegally bought them out of.

  5. This is why our next Conservative Republican Administration needs to tap into Speaker/Presidential Candidate Newt Gingrich. He is the only
    man in Washington DC. that has ever talked about any way to reign in or fix our Court System from the Federal Branches to the Supreme Court.

Comments are closed.