Mommy Angela and Mommy Jennifer are ruining children’s lives but does anyone care?


By Emma Karlin, staff writer

This story tells us of why lesbians playing make believe with the lives of children is a terrible thing. In Kansas in 2009 three amoral people, two lesbians and a male of unidentified sexual orientation colluded to create a homemade baby.  The male provided his sperm and the two lesbian mommies used it to impregnate lesbian “Mommy Jennifer” Schreiner.

The two Mommies, Mommy Angela Bauer and her honey Mommy Jennifer made contact with the donor William Marotta, through Craig’s List saying, “We are foster and adoptive parents and now we desire to share a pregnancy and birth together.”

Presumably using something like a sterile turkey baster, Mommy Jennifer conceived a baby girl. Since all had signed a “legal” document excusing Marotta of any obligation to financially support the baby, the two Mommies thought they would live happily ever after. If things went wrong if need be, the State of Kansas would ultimately support their “We don’t need a man to have a baby” baby.

When the little girl was born, Mommy Jennifer refused to name her father on her birth certificate.

 When the Mommy Angela and Mommy Jennifer “family” broke up, Mommy Jennifer applied for, and got welfare payments to support the little girl.

Now the State of Kansas has stepped in to demand the welfare payments back. They want the money from Marotta.

The amoral trio is appalled! “Why, WE all agreed Bill would not be responsible for the baby. WE made this baby and the State’s only part in our life is paying for the child we made without a man – well kind of ‘without a man’” the Mommies are saying.

These mommies were allowed to “adopt” eight children during their eight years together which came to an end the year after they produced their home made baby.

One is now just three months old meaning these two lovebirds had been separated for at least 18 months when they were allowed to adopt their latest child.  What kind of a system allows something like this? How could anyone look at these two and think it would be a good idea to let them adopt another child?

And now whose children are these adoptees anyway? Are they Mommy Angels’ or Mommy Jennifer’s? If they are Mommy Jennifer’s can she share her custodial rights with the new person in her life – a man?

If Mommy Angela doesn’t like the arrangement does she fight Mommy Jennifer for custody using free legal services provided to her by the State of Kansas? After all she is on welfare.

And what of the home made little girl; the “we don’t need a man to make a baby” baby?  Does anyone care about this little girl?  


Be Sociable, Share!

7 thoughts on “Mommy Angela and Mommy Jennifer are ruining children’s lives but does anyone care?”

  1. Another group of children that I cannot afford to raise and provide for thru welfare. What and why did the the system allow these children to be placed in this situation. Very few relationships such as these last the test of time. Now all these kids lives are screwed again. Bless the children and remove them from this mess.

  2. This is but ONE of the many reasons WHY homosexual pairs should NEVER be permitted access to children, period!

  3. The courts advice to any limp wrist, never reveal your identity just like rapists and gangster baby daddy types. The court is the failure in this whole disaster because it never considered the truth of what a family is.

    1. Unfortunately, this is but one perverted aspect of a much larger, sick and insidious agenda, that’s been being worked at for over 4 1/2 centuries, globally, and we’re now down to the last 5 years of the plan. Look at the NWO stuff, CFR, Bilderbergers, Illuminati, MB, Molod is a new member group in Israel; they’re ALL fronts for the real “terrorists” behind EVERY event since 1540, with the exception of the creation of a new nation, based on a new foundation of Protestant Reformation principles, like liberty and personal accountability, which has tossed a sabot into their works slightly; their earlier target date was the millenial turn; but now its 2018, and they’re back on track for that. All the political and fiscal clout globally are now concentrated into the control of one man, and he’s not in the US.

  4. What does this have to do with homosexuality? The issue is whether a sperm donor is responsible for parental obligations. Let’s assume it was a heterosexual couple. The man is infertile. They adopt 8 children but since the wife can bear children they decide have one through natural child birth. The couple places an ad on Craig’s List for a sperm donor. The sperm donor wants no parental responsibility. The woman has the baby. Three years later they divorce but decide to co-parent the children because they love their kids. The husband gets sick. The couple goes on welfare. Who is responsible? How’s this different from the lesbian couple? There is no difference. The only issue is the way this article was slanted by Homophoby Emma Karlin, an obiously bigoted homophobe and rank amateur writer. Here’s the same story written by a professional reporter:

Comments are closed.