Supreme Court to conference on Obama eligibility today

by Suzanne Eovaldi,  staff writer

Today, February 15, 2013, Attorney Orly Taitz brings her request to move the Obama eligibility challenge from conference to the oral hearing stage at the US Supreme Court.  She is moving forward in spite of the fact that four African-American Supreme Court clerks refused to allow Taitz to see the signature of Justice Anthony Kennedy who denied her petition originally.  “But I resubmitted to Justice Roberts, and he sent it to the conference,” Taitz said. (1)

The California attorney is asking “…how do we know that he (Kennedy) ever saw the brief?”  In no uncertain terms clerk James Baldin told me that “I (Taitz) [was] not allowed to see the signature.”   This denial of her right to see Kennedy’s signature “does not make any sense.”  Perhaps her Russian ancestry and background knowledge of the suppression of citizens caused her to note similarities with DC police actions that blocked “more and more streets” during Obama’s State of the Union address. The group of eligibility challengers were pushed farther and farther away making it impossible for the public to see or question those who attended the event.  When school students touring the buildings came up to the Taitz group to ask questions, their teacher was said to have made them leave! (2)

The crux of the Taitz challenge to Barack Obama’s legitimacy to serve as US President involves the following charges: use of forged IDs; stolen CT Social Security number; last name not legally his; fraudulent claim to being US Citizen; legal last name is SOEBARKAH on certified copy of passport records of Obama’s mother S. Ann Dunham;  (Taitz is presenting this passport evidence!); Obama’s Indonesian school records show his citizenship to be Indonesian; credible expert testimony by law enforcement individuals in sworn affidavits showing the birth certificate and selective service certificates are forged; the 2009 Social Security number on Obama’s tax returns failed both E-Verify and SSNVUS.

Also, Attorney Taitz is presenting evidence that  1 1/2 million invalid voter registrations were filed in the state of California!.  She is asking US citizens to “please, write and fax SCOTUS and demand to see the order by Justice Anthony Kennedy who allegedly originally denied my case Noonan v Bowen before it was sent by Justice Roberts to the conference.”  Is not this the very least we can do to attempt to clear up this matter?

(1) http://www.examiner.com/article/supreme-court-to-hear-case-on-obama-s-alleged-forged-documents?fb_action_ids=478123072255646&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_source

(2) http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/

  

Be Sociable, Share!

40 thoughts on “Supreme Court to conference on Obama eligibility today”

  1. What will happen if Obama is found to be ineligible by the SCOTUS? Will we be stuck with Uncle Joe as president or will a decision that renders Obama ineligible make Uncle Joe ineligible as well? Would that not negate all of Obama’s decisions including his VP as well as all appointments to the courts and all other appointments, regulations, EOs and legislation signed into law? Would it put an end to Obamacare? Would it precipitate another election or would the Speaker become president? It would be utter chaos, but anything is better than four more years!

    1. sorry willowspring..nothing is goign to come of this. Not a thing, zip, zip, nada. The effects are too enourmous to even contemplate. kennedy’s going to blow it off.

    2. Constitutional crisis; nobody knows exactly what would happen. You could expect a lot of infighting. It’s possible Obama would be allowed to serve his final term to prevent a civil war instigated by the government (seriously). Obama’s removal would not nullify any laws passed by congress, arguably because any democrat president would have signed the same things (republicans probably would have, too). All meaningful appointments are approved by congress, too. All decisions by the courts are made separate to the executive branch.

      In the end, the failure or collapse of one branch of the government does not negate the lawful operation of the other two, and that would probably be the scenario played out. Resolution would probably simply be a special election, handled by the same people in charge. Likely in the end, the removal of Obama would not fix anything in the past; it would be similar to a successful impeachment.

  2. The House of Representatives would select a president and the Senate would select a vice president, this is the Constitutional process. Validity of anything Obama did would then be decided by the political branches of government.

  3. Taitz has no proof. And the quality of what she calls “evidence” is so poor that it wouldn’t be admissible. She is a delusional wingnut who, as an immigrant, has little right to come to America and promptly attack its political and judicial institutions. She is a disgrace as a lawyer and it has to be wondered if she actually sat the law degree and Bar exams given that she knows nothing about any aspect of law, evidence or procedure. This sad saga only drags on because she has no life outside the publicity that it gives her. The latest outburst on her site will hopefully have her cited for contempt, and with luck disbarred.

      1. Sane people know the truth… And it has nothing to do with birther nonsense. And Orly Taitz would be untruthful when the truth sounded better.

        Just this afternoon she lied about her appeal in Liberi v Taitz saying the 9th Circuit vacated an Order from Judge Guilford when in fact the 9th denied her appeal and warned (strongly) of sanctions.

  4. Joe Citizen is wrong. What a surprise. The Constitution very clearly says that Biden becomes President if Obama is removed from office for any reason, and he’d then select his own VP. As for “validity” of anything that Obama did, Joe Citizen should study the “de facto” rule, where he will learn what he clearly didn’t learn at school.

  5. Obama’s eligibility is not being decided today at SCOTUS. There is no trial, no evidence presented, no witness testimony… none of that. What is before SCOTUS today re Orly is an Application for Stay wherein she asks the Court to Stay the CA SoS election in which she failed to win the primary. She also asks the Court to Stay Obama’s election, certification of electoral votes and swearing in, but she does not even name Obama in the Application.

    In addition to all that, it is a moot point. The elections have been held, and Obama sworn in.

    Due to all the lies being spread (initially by Taitz then others about what is before SCOTUS there are going to be a lot of disappointed people come later this afternoon or for certain on Tuesday, as Monday is a holiday.

  6. Perhaps allowing the Clerks to filter out the brief is all part of the plan.
    Then Justices can say they never saw it.
    Gives the Plausible Deniability.

  7. For me, the fact that so no federal judges have allowed any of these cases to move to discovery proves how politically corrupt the judicial really is.

  8. LOL@PapaJohn. Ridiculous. Take some time and learn how SCOTUS works. They don’t need “plausible deniability”.

  9. If nothing is done to remove this illegal alien, felon, forgerer, fraud, TREASONOUS imposter…then the U.S. legal system i.e. State Supreme Court has been CORRUPTED by Obama so bad that the entire U.S. Government is already been replaced by this Muslim/Communist dictator. The citizens of FREE America will have to re-take control of the entire Government and restore it with UNCORRUPTED people/leaders!!! GOD BLESS AMERICA!

    1. You sir are absolutely correct. As 4 star retired general Wesley Clarke has pointed out in youtube, the USA had been taken over by a coup. Their ‘goal’ was to take over 7 countries in the middle east in five years. It was never about ‘humanitarian purposes like the people were told. Never. It was about money and resources and the good sheep of the USA backed it up with their USD thus killing 100′s of thousands of innocent people through lies. Not only is that TREASON, those are WAR CRIMES brought on by they Muslim liar-n-chief of the USA. The USA is so hated in the world today (reading comments/articles) on other websites, and it’s all because Americans still believe this criminal. Every chance you have to make a difference, you simply turn your head and walk away or ‘ignore’ it. It’s time to wake up now. It’s almost over. If the masses don’t make a difference, then the New World Order has won. You will ALL be slaves.

  10. Isn’t it sad, that the USA, which is suppose to be CONSTITUTIONAL country is being ripped to shreds with UNCONSTITUTIONAL laws? The People of the USA could give a hoot whether their president is legal or not. They don’t care, they don’t question it, they really have GIVEN UP on the LAND OF THE FREE AND THE HOME OF THE BRAVE. Shame on those who simply suck it up and leave it quiet.
    If Obama is ELIGIBLE and has NOTHING TO HIDE, there should be nothing to worry about. But because the judges, senate and some of congress have been BOUGHT, YOU THE PEOPLE allow these UNCONSTITUTIONAL laws to overrule your CONSTITUTION.

    What a sad thing to watch from other countries.

  11. @TheBuckWheat… that would be because you obviously have no concept of how the American legal system works. Educate yourself rather than make remarks which make you look silly.

  12. Rober… as to being a felon, there is no prohibition to eligibility for POTUS. A convicted felon can run for pres.

    As for the illegal alien/forger/fraud/treasonous imposter, etc., there’s no evidence of such (certainly none that would ever be admitted in court) and if there were, he would never have been elected and would have been impeached by now… which, by the way, is the only way a sitting president can be removed… congress, not the courts.

    Oh, and Muslims and Communist Party members are also eligible… electability would be a different issue, just as with a felon, but just so you know for future reference.

  13. willowspring said: “What will happen if Obama is found to be ineligible by the SCOTUS? Will we be stuck with Uncle Joe as president or will a decision that renders Obama ineligible make Uncle Joe ineligible as well? Would that not negate all of Obama’s decisions including his VP as well as all appointments to the courts and all other appointments, regulations, EOs and legislation signed into law? Would it put an end to Obamacare? Would it precipitate another election or would the Speaker become president? It would be utter chaos, but anything is better than four more years!”
    ——————————————————
    I would hope they do the right thing first. Many former Soviet bloc countries have special elections when things like this happen. Yes, it would be chaotic but the right thing to do. It would make null and void all appointments, executive orders, and laws signed by him null and void. I would think his VP would no longer be a VP. His SCOTUS appointments would have to step down. The unfortunate part would be the damage that was done economically. Much of that cannot be undone. The spending has already happened. Yes, it would be chaotic but they need to do the right thing. Had they listened to these cases before the 2008 swearing in, we wouldn’t have had these problems. I remember Dr. Taitz trying to get them to hear the arguments then. Looks like SCOTUS clerks may have been responsible for intervening in her cases. SCOTUS may never have even seen them. She caught one clerk taking one of her cases off the online docket the day before or the day of the inauguration in 2009 but returned again the next day? They said it was a computer glitch. hmmm. And now they won’t let her see Justice Kennedy’s signature? There is something wrong with this picture.

  14. All the collected evidence is overly compelling and as for what a few people asked about what would happen if the Supreme Court found obama or whoever he really is in not constitutionally eligible and or fit for office! He and the entire administration will have to be removed as they all knew about it and did nothing and it will up to congress as to just who from congress is going to sit in office until the next election.

    1. Publics… There is no evidence of ineligibility. As to what happened if a president were removed or resigned or otherwise unable to serve, it would be nothing as you state.

      Try reading the constitution you seem to care so much about.

      1. If Obama was found ineligible, then that invalidates the election.
        If the election is invalidated that also invalidates Biden as Vice President.
        So, no, the Constitution doesn’t necessarily cover that contigency.

        1. No, Gog, it would not invalidate the elections nor Biden.

          After you read the Constitution look up the De Facto Officer’s Doctrine.

          It is also one of the many reasons Lakin’s orders would still be lawful even if Obama were proven ineligible even today or next month or next year or 5 years from now.

          The Constitution and the law is what it is, not what wishful thinkers want it to be. Quit believing what those say who fit your preconceived agenda and ideas and educate yourself.

          1. Sorry, but that’s not my premise.
            I wasn’t saying all actions of Obama would be struck.
            I was saying the ticket upon which Biden ran is invalid.
            The De Facto Officer’s Doctrine does not address fraudulent misrepresentation or distortion.

          2. Sorry Gog. That’s incorrect.

            The de facto officer doctrine confers validity upon acts performed by a person acting under the color of official title even though it is later discovered that the legality of that person’s appointment or election to office is deficient. Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, 440 (1886). “The de facto doctrine springs from the fear of the chaos that would result from multiple and repetitious suits challenging every action taken by every official whose claim to office could be open to question, and seeks to protect the public by insuring the orderly functioning of the government despite technical defects in title to office.”

          3. Frank,
            The DC Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Obama’s “recess appointments” to the NLRB unconstitutional. The court also ruled all decisions made by the Board would be illegal. Apparently the doctrine you speak about will NOT apply in this case.

  15. We The People have a fraud and usurper sitting in the White House going by the name of barack hussein obama using a stolen social security number , forged birth certificate and forged selective service registration card to prove he is a legal sitting US President . We The People must demand the US Congress honor their oath to the US Constitution and remove this fraud and usurper barack hussein obama under Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the US Constitution .

  16. Yeah.

    300 million Americans praying….

    Think what that could do.

    Or, we could just throw down.

    I wonder which would be more effective.

    I like the people here. They’re squishy.

  17. the obamas are on separat vactions this weekend spending more of our hard earned tax dollars waste waste waste. you see one giving their speech you’ve seen e’ all nothing but nothing not one godd one in the bunch.

  18. Coach.. the D.C. Appeal Court indeed held that the decision reached by the NLRB (in the case before it) was invalid because the “recess appointments” were unconstitutional and therefore, the decision was invalid because, contrary to law, the board did not have a quorum, due to the invalid appointments, not because those appointees were ineligible to the office. In fact, they have been re-nominated to the positions. So while I understand your assertion and reasoning, it is not on point.

    A Stay was submitted to SCOTUS requesting the enforcement be stayed pending appeal. Justice Ginsburg has denied the stay and it has been resubmitted but no decision has yet been forthcoming. In the meantime, the ruling stands as to that case.

    What the court then did is go far beyond what was before them and issued a far-reaching opinion which, in effect, challenges every recess appointment ever made, going back to at least 1823 and perhaps even earlier, including 3 SCOTUS appointments made by Eisenhower, all 170 made by Bush II, and hundreds and hundreds more.

    1. Frank,
      I have to disagree with your suggestion that my “assertion and reasoning are not on point.” Obama’s appointments to the NLRB were indeed NOT necessarily “ineligible” for the office. But the appointments themselves were certainly ruled unconstitutional by the DC Circuit. The Noel Canning v NLRB case was the vehicle for the court’s decision. Naturally, the NLRB has stated it will continue to operate just as though nothing had happened. Clearly the Obama Regime will appeal through the federal court system until it comes before an Obama appointee or other liberal judge/judges, taking the case all the way, quite possibly, to the Supreme Court.
      Thank you for reading Coach is Right.

      1. Not on point, meaning your assertion that the de facto officers doctrine obviously did not apply, as the case is distinguishable as to the application of DFOD.

        Yes, it will certainly be appealed. If the appeal court denies a hearing en banc it will then go to SCOTUS. And rightly so. The opinion is far-reaching and the court delved in speculation and opined on issues that were neither brought up by nor briefed by any party.

        The NLRB will not be able to do business at all, much less as if nothing happened. They can’t make rulings as they can’t have a quorum, which is why these appointments were made, as they had been sitting around with no action. It is the reason for the recess appoinents in the first place. This opinion seeks to overturn hundreds of years of practice and should certainly be challenged. And it would not have mattered whether it was a conservative or liberal court that made it. It would need challenged regardless.

        Creative gaveling is not the way this country should be run.

        Thank you for allowing me to play in your sandbox for a while. I’ve enjoyed it.

  19. Frank ,
    Put down the obama Kool Aid and take a drink of reality. You have been backing a fraud and usurper for the last four years . As for coming to any of these web sites and spouting the Alinsky garbage we are no longer buying . So go back to the Huffington Post where most of your liberal friends go .

Comments are closed.