Tag Archives: Adam Lanza

The NRA stood tall and tough when it counted most

By Doug Book, editor

Though liberal Democrats have little appreciation for the spiritual meaning of Christmas, events of December 2012 would bring Joy to the Political World of every avid, gun-hating politician in Washington D.C.

For on December 14th, twenty children and six adults responsible for their care were shot to death at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. Their killer ended his own life minutes later with a round to the head.

Understanding the importance of disarming the American people, gun confiscation advocates like Chuck Schumer, Diane Feinstein and Barack Obama no doubt wished the death toll had been higher. But as children were involved, even 20 dead would have the American public ready to accept—however unwillingly– a raft of new, anti-gun edicts. Democrats and the national media would see to that. For neither the NRA nor pro-gun Republicans would have the gall to stand in the way by quoting chapter and verse of the 2nd Amendment. Not this time.  After all, never had the left been blessed with such a delicious level of exploitable carnage! It would be a legislative gimme!

Then, four days after the killings, the NRA offered its eagerly anticipated response to the left’s set-up story of evil “assault weapons” and the ease with which they can be acquired. But refusing to be cowed by liberal Democrats or their equally anti-gun proponents in the national media, NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre told the American public that “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.” The next psychopath intent upon taking advantage of the defenseless victims of “gun free zones” will only be stopped by the armed response of good people, not a new layer of ineffective legislation.

The media was stunned. Liberal Democrats were taken aback, feigning disgust at the brazen, unfeeling nature of LaPierre’s remarks. Of course the unexpressed media/Dem Party response was really one of: “Damn, what happened!” This collection of dedicated gun grabbers had expected a contrite, almost apologetic NRA. They would relish the unconditional surrender of an NRA which had for some years displayed a less confrontational side; one which earned the contempt of members across the country. The NRA had endorsed Harry Reid for God’s sake!

But far from apologizing for a history of oft times rigid, pro-gun positions, LaPierre hit the left right between the eyes. And guess what! The American people–gun owners and non-owners alike–stood 4-Square with the NRA. DC Democrats were apoplectic. All of their plans of gloating over the defeated carcass of the once feared gun group went up in smoke. Visions of mandatory gun registration, confiscation of “assault weapons” and “high capacity” magazines, SWAT teams intimidating American citizens with midnight raids and the ultimate manufacture of subjects from what had once been free citizens—it had all gone to Hell. The NRA had picked the right time to be tough. It had defined the problem of gun free zones and offered the only solution for the defense of unarmed innocents.

There is no question that NRA higher-ups have sometimes displayed weakness, stupidity, even lunacy. How can the premier American gun-rights organization endorse Harry Reid?

But one very courageous statement offered at exactly the right time did more to derail a dangerous, liberal assault against gun owners than the combined efforts of DC Republicans for the past decade. As gun owners, we owe the NRA a lot.

Are Psychotropic drugs the hidden prescription for mass murder?

by Suzanne Eovaldi
 
Why are no medical or media authorities investigating the dangers of psychotropic drugs given to teens, especially to teenage boys?  The inevitable B rolls on our television screens which follow each and every school shooting incident never mention the prescription meds the teen shooter may have been given.  The Adam Lanza possible psychotropic drug of choice was mentioned early in Sandy Hook media frenzy, but was dropped as a likely factor in the killings in later reports.
  
Two very important civil cases are being analyzed by outstanding investigative reporter Jon Rappoport who has for years warned about these toxic psychiatric drugs.  “As I’ve demonstrated in previous articles, none of these mental disorders for which these destructive chemicals are prescribed are legitimate.  That is, there are zero objective and defining tests for any mental disorder diagnosis. . .no saliva, blood, urine, or hair test.  No brain scan.  No genetic assay.”  This great reporter in his earlier web essays has linked the teen male shooters with possible psychiatric medication usage. But this link has barely been covered by our mainstream media, perhaps to avoid interrupting the money stream from the drug and medical companies into media coffers.  Dr. Michael Savage several years ago went on at length about the dangers involved in giving these very dangerous black box pills to brains not fully developed.  Rappoport states if these industry tests were definitive, “they would be listed in the bible of the psychiatric profession, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. . .THEY’RE NOT THERE,” he says. (1)

In the 2014 civil lawsuit Angel v. Segal, a Chicago jury gave a $1.5 million award to an autistic child who was given Risperdal and Zyprexa. Dr. Peter Breggin (www.breggin.com) was the expert witness who turned the case for the boy. “The boy developed two conditions, called tardive dyskinesia and tardive akathisia.” (2) Unrelenting motion, twitches, motor disabilities, and other neurological problems made this autistic boy’s condition worse, points our Rappoport!
 
This brave expert witness had come forward in 2012 in a drug-induced suicide case in Syracuse, NY. (3)  “I found that a glaring negligence had been committed in the (Joseph Mazella) case,” said Dr. Breggin. (3) A family doctor “prescribed Paxil for Mr. Mazella for 10 years without seeing him…despite having no contact with the patient for a decade, by telephone (the man’s doctor) doubled his Paxil and added Zyprexa.” The man died one month later by taking his own life. The jury award then totaled $1.5 million.
 
Perhaps, yet again, the media are our biggest enemies in these cases as they lie by omission!  The media fail to tell the American people of the dangers inherent in many of the drugs which are flooding our airwaves and appearing in glowing print ads.  By taking ad revenue while failing to disclose all of the facts, the media joins their medical advertisers in a complicity of silence.  Only brave doctors like Dr. Peter Breggin and brave reporters like Jon Rappoport show us the love and concern they have by telling us the real story of these dangers.  Would Columbine, Sandy Hook or Aurora have taken place without brain disabling treatments?  Why are we not being given the entire story of the likely involvement of anti-psychotic medications in the horrific male, teen shooter tragedies?
  
edit note:  Dr. Breggin is addressing a Clearwater, Florida conference about “Psychotherapy Without Medication for the Most Challenging Clients” in the outstanding Empathic Therapy Conference happening 2-28, March 1.  Go to http://www.empathictherapy.org/conference.html

SOURCE: (1) (2) (3) (4)  www.nomorefakenews.com

This very helpful quote can be found on Dr. Breggin’s website:  “There is no such thing as a spontaneous anxiety or endogenous depression. If a patient is anxious, there is something to be scared of.  If a patient is depressed, there is something to be depressed about.  If it is not in consciousness, then it is unconscious. If it is not in the present, then it is in the past, and something in the present symbolizes it.”  Bertram Karon, PhD

Angel v Segal: State of Illinois, Circuit Court, Cook County. Law Division No. 09L.3498

Gun control advocates deliberately facilitated the murders at Sandy Hook

by Doug Book,  staff writer

Advocates of overturning the right to keep and bear arms have spent years DELIBERATELY turning innocents into victims of slaughter for the purpose of disarming the American people.

“Do as I say, not as I do,” gun-control zealots are predictably out in force after the Sandy Hook killings. For in the perverted mind of confiscation supporters like Michael Bloomberg and Barack Obama, the murder of 20 kindergarten students represents a longed-awaited opportunity to embarrass weak-kneed defenders of the 2nd Amendment into relenting to a nationwide assault against the foremost liberty of the American people.  

On December 19th, New York Mayor Bloomberg favored USA Today readers with a 6 point guide to “stop gun madness.” (1)

And like every previous claim of the hypocritical founder of Mayors Against (Illegal) Guns (Bloomberg enjoys the 24/7 protection of taxpayer funded, armed bodyguards as he denies gun ownership to fellow New Yorkers), the essay by Bloomberg is a study in calculated misdirection. For Bloomberg and other proponents of “common sense gun legislation” know full well that their proposed ban on the sale of “assault rifles” and “high-capacity” magazines will have no effect on gun crime.  (2)

Why craft legislation which purposely disarms only law abiding Americans? Why create and proudly advertise the existence of “gun free zones” which render countless people utterly defenseless against wanton killers?

If plans for gun confiscation are to succeed, the left know it must make firearms a loathsome commodity to an increasingly pro-gun populace. What better way to accomplish such a goal than to facilitate-by-statute the most murderous fantasies of psychopaths intent upon making their names and deeds part of American history?

So legislation was passed which guaranteed an unlimited supply of defenseless victims for prospective mass murderers.  Gun free zones, though represented as safe havens, were knowingly and deliberately fashioned to facilitate leisurely slaughter as they provide only for the security and convenience of armed killers, not their statutorily disarmed victims.  

And it was at Sandy Hook that the fondest wishes of gun-confiscation advocates have been granted. Knowing they will never have a better opportunity of success, Michael Bloomberg and other self-absorbed elitists will press demands for firearm bans and restrictions as never before. After all, only unfeeling monsters could defend 2nd Amendment rights in the face of 20, brutally murdered children.

What sort of perverse, diseased mind is required to deliberately legislate the assured slaughter of innocents in order to advance a political agenda? Perhaps the sort which has been so eagerly involved in promoting the murder of infants for decades.  

Soon the banning of specified firearms will begin. When the next psychopath proves this latest gun control legislation to also be ineffective by design, another even more audacious round of gun bans will ensue. Then another and another until confiscation is deemed the “final solution,” necessary for the protection of the people. From that day forward, self-defense will consist of begging for one’s life rather than defending it on equal terms!!

It is then that the 2nd American Revolution will begin as those who refuse to submit to the left’s long anticipated decree of slavery will resist by every means at their command.

I only hope I’m around to fire the first shot.

 

(1) http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2012/12/18/michael-bloomberg-on-need-to-control-guns/1777889/

(2) http://patriotaction.net/forum/topic/show?id=2600775%3ATopic%3A6035555&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_topic

There may be far more to Sandy Hook incidents than guns

by Suzanne Eovaldi,  staff writer

As Democrats and Progressives use this enormous tragedy as the tag necessary to push for nationwide gun control, permit me, a 30 year teacher of young adult males, to offer my reasons as to why this breakdown in our society is happening.    

First of all, was Adam Lanza on any type of “mind altering” drugs in recent months, or from his early childhood?  Teachers of young males often encourage parents to put their young children on hyper activity medication just to make the classroom atmosphere easier to control.  One of my students, a middle age mom, asked me if she should put her son on Ritalin?  She was getting pressure from his school to do something about his “hyper-activity.”  I said, “No, don’t do it.”  Any type of psychotropic drug affects younger brains more dramatically in my humble opinion.

All we will get from the media and liberal politicians will be pressure on Congress to control the guns Americans can buy, but little to no mention will be given to putting sanctions in place to control the legal drugs our young children are being given! Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, cautions us: “We should be outlawing psychiatric medications, not an inanimate piece of metal.” Adams stresses that, “One of the most common side effects of psychiatric drugs is violent outbursts and thoughts of suicide.” (1)

He wants a real debate about what the real first offender is:  guns or the DRUGS which are huge money makers for Big Pharma and its enormous D.C. lobby!  Adams says, “The Columbine High School shooters were on psychiatric drugs at the time they shot their classmates in 1999.  Suicidal tendencies and violent, destructive thoughts are some of the admitted behavioral side effects of mind-altering prescription medications.” (1)

The debasement of white American males in progress for at least the past 20 years sees fathers pass along much disappointment to their young sons.  And these Dads often are not under the same roof anymore.  We’ve removed the male Rites of Passage rituals from the lives of our young sons.  Our politically correct culture, our Schools of Education and their pedagogic graduates have imposed a PC, multicultural ethos on students for years.  I was hard-pressed to find one positive essay or piece of literature featuring white American males in a syllabus I was given to teach a college level lit class. I substituted “Hamlet” for “Raisin in the Sun” because we’ve had quite enough of Hate Whitey!

Our media foster this gross denigration of white American men in images portraying them as sex fiends, pedophiles and killers in any number of sit coms and TV advertisements. We have a school system which is trending towards imposed matriarchy to continue the destruction of the male ego. 

It is also important that we do more to control the spread of violent video games than simply require an “M” be placed on the product jacket. The frighteningly realistic slaughter of characters in a digital world effectively desensitizes young minds which may equate “assassination-by-joystick” with the real thing.

Gun control advocates will use the Sandy Hook tragedy to advance gun confiscation legislation as they ignore all other potential reasons for the crime. It is legitimate to wonder how many future Sandy Hooks will take place simply because the discussion will be driven by political agenda rather than a search for the truth.

(1) http://www.naturalnews.com/038353_gun_control_psychiatric_drugs_adam_lanza.html