Tag Archives: Barack Obama

Egyptian Government files suit against Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton

By Doug Book, editor

On March 11th, Coach is Right staff writer Ed Wood wrote the following in his CiR piece “All Quiet on the Western Front:”

In addition to raining spiteful criticism upon Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu…President Obama has also chosen to petulantly ignore Egyptian President General Abdel Fatah al-Sisi as he demonstrates his own leadership abilities on the world stage.

For years, Egypt and Israel have been our strongest (and perhaps only) allies in the Middle East. We have given Egypt upwards of $1.5 BILLION annually, second only to Israel in foreign aid commitments.

But this was before the newly elected President Obama went to the University of Cairo in 2009 where he ignited the Arab Spring uprisings, challenged terrorists to undermine existing Middle East rulers and in particular, supported Muslim Brotherhood candidate Mohammad Morsi as Egypt’s next president.

Then came the fiery pictures of rioting in Cairo’s Tahrir Square which accompanied the ouster of Morsi and the installation of Egypt’s current President General Abdel Fatah al-Sisi. In 2013, TIME magazine named al-Sisi their “Person of the year” as he became the first president in Egyptian history to attend the Christmas Mass and give a speech at the Coptic Orthodox Christmas service in Cairo, where he called for unity and wished Christians a merry Christmas.

But President Obama–a professed Christian—continues his petty show of displeasure with the nation which dared toss his hand-picked thug, Mohammed Morsi from office.

Wood notes that al-Sisi is a Muslim, just like 90% of Egypt’s population. However, “…he (al-Sisi) does not condone the ideology of radical Islam and has taken on the Muslim Brotherhood while “revolutionizing” Islam within his country.”

And “taking on the Muslim Brotherhood” really means something to al-Sisi and the people of Egypt. For Mohammed Morsi is still in jail and growing numbers of Muslim Brotherhood terrorists continue to join him. 

Wood includes the following information from the Gatestone Institute which reports: “The Muslim Brotherhood knows that behind the scenes U.S. President Obama supports their movement, especially the branch in Egypt seeking to overthrow President Sisi. This approval from the U.S. encourages the Muslim Brotherhood to be even more determined to subvert and undermine Egypt’s stability, sabotage its economic rehabilitation, and destroy the al-Sisi regime.”

But al-Sisi and the Egyptian government have become so fed up with Barack Obama meddling in their affairs that they have filed suit against both Obama and Hillary Clinton for “conspiring with the Muslim Brotherhood,” the terror organization to which Mohammed Morsi still belongs.

The complaint is said to charge that “…Barack Obama assisted the Muslim Brotherhood in crimes against Egypt and its citizens.”

Not wishing to ignore the contributions of Hillary Clinton, Egypt’s criminal complaint states that the former Secretary of State was “…found to be working with ousted Muslim Brotherhood president Mohammed Morsi’s wife, Naglaa Mahmood, in attempting to overthrow the current leader of Egypt, General Abdel Fatah Al-Sisi.”

From the beginning of his administration, Barack Obama has clearly been working with the Muslim Brotherhood to reshape the nations of the Middle East into dictatorships run by the Brotherhood under the precepts of Sharia Law. In the case of Egypt at least, Obama’s Arab Spring attempt to enslave its people was thrown back in his face, along with Brotherhood thug and tool Morsi.

Kudos to the Nation of Egypt for exposing at least a few of the crimes of which Obama and Hillary are guilty.

Sources: http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/?p=32502

http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-clinton-charged-muslim-brotherhood-conspiracy/

http://www.coachisright.com/quiet-western-front/

About Damn Time

By Jim Emerson, staff writer

Secretary of the Army, John McHugh, has ordered that “all possible benefits,” be awarded to the families of those murdered by Muslim terrorist Nidal Hassan in the 2009 Fort Hood killings. This comes on the heels of last weeks’ Purple Heart award ceremonies for the Ft. Hood victims of Hassan; award presentations delayed 5 years thanks to the decision of Barack Hussein Obama to mask the Islamic terror murders committed by a fellow Muslim by declaring them “work place violence.” This despicable decision rendered family members ineligible for military benefits and the fallen unable to be awarded the Purple Heart.

It took an act of congress to expand the criteria of eligibility in order that Hassan’s victims could receive the medal and the shooting could be declared an act of terrorism. (1) This “necessary act of Congress” is of course the cover story meant to deliver jihad apologist and sympathizer Obama from his disgraceful decision to value the reputation of a Muslim terrorist over the lives of service members and the promise he made to Ft. Hood hero, former police sergeant Kimberly Munley, that the victims would be “well taken care of.” (4)

It was more than five years until the 47 victims of Hassan were awarded a Purple Heart or its civilian counterpart, a Defense of Freedom Medal. The ceremony was years in the making but the medals were initially awarded without the additional benefits that accompany the Purple Heart. It has been suggested that Secretary of the Army McHugh “changed his mind” and at last decided to provide benefits to victim families, but obviously that “change” was ordered by Barack Obama who had been embarrassed enough by the story in spite of media attempts to cover up for him as usual.

April 14 Memorandum

Secretary McHugh wrote that he “Intend(s) To Ensure That The Soldiers Receiving The Purple Heart Under The Expanded Criteria Also Receive All Other Related Benefits For Which They Are Eligible.” (2) Translation, he is afraid that he may have to face a congressional investigation. Some of the soldiers and family have an ongoing lawsuit still seeking more money from the government. Since the White House had to admit the shooting was an act of terrorism the Army was probably going to lose in court. But the “gesture” was obviously a face saving effort made on behalf of Barack Hussein, NOT the Army.

In addition to the Fort Hood survivors the medal and benefits will be awarded to the victims of a 2009 jihadist attack on a Little Rock, Arkansas, recruiting station. One soldier was killed and a second was wounded.

It’s about damn time this administration did something right concerning the Foot Hood victims, even though it took an act of congress to compel them. Now the victims of home grown Muslim terrorism have the recognition and care they so dearly needed. Kudos to Rep. John Carter, R-Texas for his tireless efforts since 2009 to grant the award to victims and their families, which also provided them additional health care, pay and survivor benefits. Job well done.

Sources:
1. http://www.military.com/daily-news/2015/04/10/fort-hood-shooting-victim-denied-benefits-despite-purple-heart.html
2. http://www.armytimes.com/story/military/pentagon/2015/04/16/fort-hood-purple-heart-benefits/25874715/
3. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/04/16/army-orders-financial-benefits-for-200-fort-hood-shooting-victims/?intcmp=latestnews
4. http://pamelageller.com/2013/02/members-of-congress-demand-obama-administration-classify-ft-hood-attack-as-an-act-of-terrorism.html/

Ancient Rome would not stand for an ISIS training camp eight miles from them, why is Obama doing nothing?

By Kevin “Coach” Collins

During the height of the glory years of ancient Rome its leaders grow in wealth and power by identifying threats and meeting them head on. Political correctness had no place in deliberations about what to do to counter threats. The Romans reached for their swords their banners and marched against them.

Alas those days are gone. They have been blurred and erased by clever enemies who have worked diligently to place their agents deeply into the offices of power and authority in our government and civil life. Our government our media and our schools are corrupted by lies about the nature of our self-proclaimed enemy – Islam. Theses saboteurs are always working to undermine our will to resist their evil intentions.

While these treacheries are survivable, what is not survivable is the actual tangible threat of our enemies pouring into our nation unopposed by our once great military forces.

We have reports that ISIS has a training camp in Mexico eight miles from our border and the story is largely being ignored as if doing so will somehow make it untrue. Our president has not commented on this report. Our spineless media has not asked him or the Republicans masquerading as our Congressional leaders about this; nor have any of them offered a comment. What would have happened if the Nazis tried this in 1942?

Consider the following quote from Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 -43BC) and ask yourself if Barack Obama could have even served as a slave in the Roman Senate.

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague”

Who do we believe, Obama or Iran? Part 2

By Jim Emerson, staff writer

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has the final say on all matters that affect the Islamic Republic, blasted the framework of the nuclear accord with the United States, saying it would restrict Iran’s nuclear program. He called it unacceptable.

The Ayatollah had neither officially endorsed nor rejected the agreement, throwing the so-called deal into doubt. On his official Tweet the leader claimed the State Department fact sheet contained information which was “contrary to what was agreed.” In the midst of a hissy fit, the State Department’s spokesman insisted the fact sheet was accurate. This begs the question, who do we believe? (4)

In an interview, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Marziyeh Afkham portrayed the Obama Administration’s claims concerning Iran’s nuclear concessions as a “wish list”. (1) None of the issues touted in the Fact Sheet have been agreed upon, claimed Afkham. Moreover, the inspections, sanctions and further enrichment have not been negotiated.

The official talking point of the Iranian regime is that anything Obama and his acolytes say is a deception. That claim began when Obama spiked the ball in the Rose Garden. Within hours Iranians had accused Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry of lying about the details of the framework deal and of intentionally misleading Congress and the American people.

Breitbart’s, John Hayward (3) “said Iran was going to humiliate Obama as much as possible by tearing up his “historic arms control deal” in his face, one paragraph at a time… secure in the knowledge that Obama’s pathological inability to admit error will compel the Administration to make excuses and try to keep the “deal” alive.” His analysis is certainly accurate based on this administration’s inability to admit a mistake.

Iran may be playing a long game, hoping to divide the Europeans from Obama’s negotiators in an effort to scuttle the nuclear talks. They know full well that to save his precious legacy, Obama will surrender any position to the Iranians, confident that friends and toadies in the liberal American media will protect his image exactly as they have done since 2008. He will work on any angle to conceal questionable parts of the final agreement from Congress and the Drudge Report.

Iran knows that, as Obama is a traitor to the United States, he and stooge Secy. of State Kerry will cave and agree to a disastrous deal which will remove sanctions. Iran will carry on just as though nothing had happened.

In the words of PBS’ NewsHour Judy Woodruff, “Is it correct to say that this is really not about denying Iran a nuclear weapon but about delaying the date they get one?” (2)

Obama is more concerned about his legacy than the security of this country. This White House is counting on kicking the can down the road and when Iran uses the bomb it won’t be on his watch. Obama is counting on the national media, stupid voters and Common Core to overlook the history of his failures.

Please find Part 1 of “Who Do We Believe” on April 4th Coach is Right at:  http://www.coachisright.com/who-do-we-believe-obama-or-iran/

Sources:
1. http://freebeacon.com/national-security/iran-new-nuke-deal-is-not-acceptable/
2. http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015/04/09/iran_deal_is_all_about_obama_s_narcissism
3. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/04/09/irans-humiliation-of-obama-continues-sanctions-must-end-instantly-when-deal-signed/
4. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/04/09/deal-or-no-deal-iran-leaders-blast-us-claims-on-nuke-deal-make-heavy-demands/

What really is Islam?

By Ed Wood, staff writer

Islam is not just a religion, or a form of government. It is a complete system, encompassing religious, legal, political, economic and military components, with each being utilized as required. “Muslims” are those that follow the Islamic doctrine.

Islamic domination occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called “religious rights.” When politically correct and culturally diverse societies, such as ours, agree to seemingly reasonable Muslim demands for their religious liberties, they are subsequently enforced on the remainder of the population through the use of their political and military components.

Dr. Peter Hammond, in his book, “Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat,” explains how it works. The percentage source is from the “CIA World Fact Book (2007)”. As we know, there has been significant growth in Muslim influence, especially here in the US.

As long as the Muslim population remains under 2%, they will, for the most part, be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. Australia, Canada, Italy.

At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. Right now, the US is thought to be in this category, with some emerging practices characteristic of the 5% and 10% levels.

From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of “halal” (clean by Islamic standards) food. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. Cookeville restaurants are already offering halal-prepared meals, and Wal-Mart is offering halal products in their meat department. And they are already challenging Tennessee law to legitimize their ruling themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. France, Philippines, Sweden, Switzerland.

When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. Do recent incidents in Ferguson, MO and New York City come to mind? India, Israel, Kenya, Russia.

After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues: Ethiopia.

At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare. Bosnia, Lebanon.

From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and jizya, a special tax placed on infidels. Qatar, Malaysia.

After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad. Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Turkey.

100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace. The Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word. Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan.

Please note how much of our nation’s foreign policy — military and financial — is involved in the Islamic-dominated countries throughout the world. Opposing some, and propping up others.

So why bring this up now?

While much of the nation mourned the murder of two NYC policemen at the hands of Muslim Ismaaiyl Abdulla Brinsley, our Commander in Chief teed-off on Christmas eve with the radical Islamist prime minister Najib Razak of Malaysia, a country in the 60%+ category. Obama’s advisors said President Obama was simply taking advantage of the “warm temperatures in Hawaii to hit the links,” and that his opponent is not a factor. Yeah. Right.

Just remember the statement of the President on page 261 in the paperback edition of his autobiography, “The Audacity of Hope:” “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”

I do believe the political winds have shifted into an “ugly direction.”