Tag Archives: Barack Obama

Of course it seems impossible, but John Kerry has bashed America

commentary by John Velisek USN (Ret), staff writer

Via CNS News:

“ ‘There is nothing sanctimonious’ or arrogant in the State Department’s publication of an annual report on human rights around the world, Secretary of State John Kerry said Thursday, adding that the U.S. cannot help but be humble itself given the racial tensions at home over the past year.

Releasing the latest report – covering 2014 and issued 120 days late – Kerry said some foreign governments may take issue with it.

‘My advice to any leader who is upset by these findings is really to examine them, to look at the practices of their country, and to recognize that the way to alter what the world thinks and the way to change these judgments is to alter what is happening in those countries,’ he said.

‘That is the advice that we also give to ourselves,’ Kerry added. ‘There is nothing sanctimonious in this. There is zero arrogance. And we couldn’t help but have humility when we have seen what we have seen in the last year in terms of racial discord and unrest.’

‘So we approach this with great self-awareness. But we also understand that when human rights is the issue, every country, including the United States, has room to improve,’ he said. ‘And the path to global respect always begins at home.’ ”

By Patrick Goodenough

 

My Opinion: John Kerry bashing America. Well, it’s nice to see some things never change. My rich boy (thanks to very convenient marriages) has bashed America ever since the Winter Soldier days. I would love to know how many real American Soldiers would be willing to serve with him now.

The racial discord he so hypocritically laments exists because of Kerry and his fellow, America-hating socialists. For six years this administration has done all they can to divide this country by class, race and now sex. You and Obama have deliberately turned this country’s citizens, one against another, John. When it finally falls apart you will be out of office, sitting at home like royalty and telling others what they should do. You weren’t a hero then sir, and you are not a hero now. I was there as well and your reputation precedes you: A narcissist, a self-promoting gigolo and as I said before, some things never change.

“Nothing sanctimonious or arrogant in the State Department’s publication of an annual report on human rights?” Barack Obama and John Kerry are not self-important, they are self-infatuated! But no one can say they don’t have a sense of humor. 

Source: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/kerry-human-rights-us-cannot-help-have-humility-given-racial-discord

Supreme Court has made confiscation of firearms a breeze

By Doug Book, editor

Last year, Democrat Senator Ed Markey (NY) and Democrat Rep. Carolyn Maloney (Mass) introduced legislation suggesting Barack Obama’s Centers for Disease Control (CDC) be paid $10 million/year to fund “…research on gun violence prevention and firearm safety.” According to the far left Markey, “it is time we study the issue of gun violence like the public health crisis that it is. If we want to prevent injury and deaths from guns, we need to know what can be done to prevent it.”

Truth be told, Markey and Maloney believe the best way to prevent gun violence is by making it illegal or at the very least, impossible, to own a gun. Maloney recently introduced legislation which would require all gun owners purchase liability insurance for their firearms and pay a $10,000 fine should they be discovered without it. Naturally, members of law enforcement would be exempt.

“An insurance requirement would allow the free market to encourage cautious behavior and help save lives,” said Maloney. “Adequate liability coverage would also ensure that the victims of gun violence are fairly compensated when crimes or accidents occur.” Only a leftist would claim that liability insurance is necessary to make gun owners exercise appropriate caution with their firearms.

Each year, about 60% of gun deaths are the result of suicide. Would Maloney demand insurance companies pay off in cases of suicide? Would a suicide “victim’s” estate be charged the $10,000 fine if he was found to have been uninsured?

As to “fair compensation” in the event of a crime or accident, it is rumored that the overwhelming majority of gun crimes are committed by criminals. The odds against thieves, killers or rapists carrying liability insurance on their stolen firearm would be astronomical. Will Maloney recommend Progressive or The General provide “no fault” gun insurance, just in case? And would that absolve the criminal of guilt for having committed the crime, or just for having used a gun?

Perhaps the real question is why Representative Maloney believed it necessary to introduce this legislation in the first place. The nation’s hoplophobes have already been given the ultimate, winning hand against gun owners.

In 2012, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts ruled that the federal government may demand the American people purchase a required item and tax anyone who refuses. Last month, Roberts and 5 other justices decided that the president, the Internal Revenue Service, even the Court itself may write, re-write and implement legislation. An act of Congress is no longer necessary, conflicting claims in the Constitution of the United States notwithstanding.

Given these recent rulings by the Roberts Court–the first on ObamaCare, the second in King v Burwell–Barack Obama’s Department of Justice will have the authority to create legislation demanding the purchase of a $1 million liability policy by every gun owner, for every gun owned. Those who refuse could be taxed the sum of, say,  $100,000 for each uninsured firearm. Simple and legal, at least according to the Court. And for those unwilling to either pay up or relinquish their weapons, Barack and the Supremes will confiscate their house!

Though such abuse of the American people may not happen over night, rest assured that it WILL happen.

 

Charleston –the Pain and the Glory

By Ed Wood, staff writer

I believe it was the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. who expressed the opinion that true racial harmony would come to the South before it comes to the North. The reaction of the people of CHARLESTON CHURCHCharleston, SC, and more specifically, the bereaved family members of the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church where such a heinous crime was committed, may give credence to Dr. King’s assessment.

If we compare the recent Baltimore circumstance to the tragedy in Charleston and forget, for the moment, that the Baltimore incident was triggered by the arrest of a suspected drug dealer while in Charleston, the victims were attending a prayer seRIOT BALTIMORE PICrvice in their church—if we do these things and consider only the number of victims, the Charleston incident was at least 9 times worse.

But look at the difference in community reaction. In the northern city of Baltimore, Maryland there was looting, burning, and pillaging. In Charleston, South Carolina there was an outpouring of Christian forgiveness. Or as was stated by one of the bereaved family members, “We are handling it with grace and love, not hatred.”

And their word to the world was:

“Hey Ferguson. Hey Baltimore. This is South Carolina. This is how we do it. We are family. No riots. No looting. Nobody acting like A Sharptonanimals. What do you see here? Multi-racial. Multi-ethnic. All colors. All races. Banding together to defeat evil. No Obama. No  Sharpton. We don’t need Obama’s patronizing, politicizing attitude. We don’t need Sharpton’s divisive presence. Both of you, STAY AWAY!”

Dr. Alveda King, niece of the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. said it this way: “Evil knows no color. My grandmother, Alberta King, was shot down & killed by a crazed black man while playing the organ in Church.”

But that wasn’t enough for the race hustlers and politicians. Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) wanted to use the incident to promote his favorite issue, gun control, “I do not know how much longer we can thwart the views of the American public on taking reasonable gun safety measures.”

Others, remembering the words of Rahm Emanuel, Obama’s first Chief of Staff, “You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it’s an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.”

Since the bereaved families, specifically and the Charleston community, in general, have demanded that opportunistic carpet-baggers stay out, it has become necessary that professional race-baiters invent some other way to take advantage of this heinous crime.

So they selected a Confederate flag, flying from a Confederate monument on the grounds of the South Carolina state capital, 114 miles away.   Confed Flag So Caro

You know the story. Or at least part of it. The end is not yet in sight.

Politicians are taking over for the race hustlers as all Confederate memorabilia are being banned, from Virginia license tags to Wal-Mart to the emblem on the Dodge Charger toy cars like Jefferson Memthe real one used in the TV series Dukes of Hazard. Next to be    targeted will be the likenesses of historic figures, such as Generals Robert E. Lee and Nathan Bedford Forrest, along with the names of highways, buildings and the like. Even the Jefferson Memorial and   the Washington Monument are being questioned, since both Washington and Jefferson are reported to have owned slaves.   robert e lee

The objective, sadly, has nothing to do with erasing the memory of the tragedy that occurred in Charleston’s Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church. But it has everything to do with dismantling the healing legacy of the postwar South and the current, Conservative political influence that goes with it.

It seems the reaction in Charleston was far too grown up and cordial to suit the tastes of our “post-racial” president.

It’s getting tougher to provide cover for Barack’s Religion of Peace

By John Velisek USN (Ret), staff writer

   From Western Journalism:

New Poll: Majority Of American Muslims Want Sharia, Shocking Numbers On Jihad

On the heels of Barack Obama’s woeful mourning that most Americans have a “distorted impression” of Islam comes a new Fox News poll that won’t exactly help the president’s cause.

The poll finds that the majority of Islamic Americans agree that Muslims should be able to forego the Constitution and be governed instead by Sharia law. The same Sharia that says you can’t draw Muhammad, or insult him, or question his having slaves or being a pedophile. The same Sharia that says you must sympathize with terrorists. The same Sharia that says all Jews must be eliminated. The same Sharia that says you must convert, or you must die. THAT Sharia.

The poll also found that 25% of Muslims in America agree that violence against Americans can be justified as part of global jihad, and 29% agree that violence against those who insult Islam is sometimes acceptable. Catch that? 1 in 4 American Muslims think jihad against YOU, America, is justified as a part of global jihad.

Estimates of the number of Muslims currently living in the U.S. range anywhere from 5 million to 12 million. That means anywhere from 1.25 to 3 MILLION Muslim Americans are good with jihad – with killing – YOU. Because you’re not a Muslim. Therefore, you should die. Sharia.

Moderate Islam is a myth, folks. Time we tell the world the truth.

By Steven Crowder

   My Opinion:

Will the left ever stop claiming how inoffensive Muslims really are and how only a teensy weensy, misguided minority means to do us any harm? If the majority were moderate Muslims, would the poll cited above reveal what it does?

According to Barack, misinformed Americans “…mostly hear about Muslims in the news and that can obviously lead to a very distorted impression.”  HUH? Is Mr. Obama talking about the American news media which refuse to even mention 9/11, or use “Muslim” and “terrorism” in the same sentence? The same media that dropped the Ft. Hood massacre story like the proverbial hot potato when it was learned that the killer had screamed Allahu Akbar as he murdered unarmed, defenseless people one after the other? That news media?

If our opinions about Muslims have really been “distorted” by the media, Americans would believe these sub humans to be far less despicable than they really are, now wouldn’t we, Barack!

“A little less than every five hours, somewhere around the world a Muslim is carrying out a fatal jihadist attack,” writes investigative journalist Bob Unrah.  Unrah’s information comes from The Religion of Peace (TROP), a website dedicated to “the politically incorrect truth about Islam; one really messed up religion.”

Since 9/11 there have been 26,221 jihadist attacks by Muslims around the world, writes TROP site operator Glen Roberts (a pseudonym) of the dangers posed by Mr. Obama’s religion of moderates.  Roberts includes a list of attacks during the past 30 days; the BBC tracked terror attacks by Muslims in November of 2014. During that peaceful month, Muslims accounted for 5,042 deaths in 664 attacks over 14 countries. It came to about 7 per hour. Now there’s efficiency for you!

If these are moderate Muslims, I worry about the bad ones. Time to lock and load and watch your back.

Supreme Court finds Congress irrelevant as Justices award law making powers to president and…Supreme Court

By Doug Book, editor

Coach is Right recently alerted its readers to the importance of the upcoming Supreme Court decision in King v Burwell, a case which would determine whether the Internal Revenue Service had the authority—on the orders of Barack Obama–to re-interpret the Affordable Care Act in a manner favorable to Obama and contrary to the clear language and intent of the Act as written by Congress.

Though Obama and members of his Regime have already re-written the Act (contrary to the Constitution) on 31 separate occasions, it was hoped—certainly it was never more than a hope—that the Court would uphold the will of a Congress which wrote 7 times in the Act that subsidies to ObamaCare policy holders would be made available only by ObamaCare Exchanges built by one of the 50 states. The law clearly made subsidies and tax credits unavailable in any state with an ObamaCare Exchange built by the federal government.

A ruling which found that “An Exchange established by the State” was indeed “An Exchange Established by the State” would of course make subsidies unavailable in the 34 States with an ObamaCare Exchange built by the Federal Government. Policy prices would not be competitive in 2/3rds of the nation and the Affordable Care Act would rapidly meet its demise.

But on Thursday, the Court’s decision was published and as many feared, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the clear language and intent of Congress were not acceptable to the Court as the clear language and intent of Congress. As Justice Scalia wrote in the dissent he shared with Justices Alito and Thomas, “…normal rules of interpretation seem always to yield to the overriding principle of the present Court: The Affordable Care Act MUST be saved.” (My Caps)

Justice Scalia’s dissent is one for the ages as he not so politely eviscerates the majority, for “The somersaults of statutory interpretation they have performed (‘penalty’ means tax…‘established by the State’ means not established by the State) will be cited by litigants endlessly, to the confusion of honest jurisprudence.”

For anyone not paying attention, Justice Scalia has just accused his colleagues of being dishonest. It is a statement beyond the simply critical of Justice Roberts and to a lesser degree, Justice Kennedy, as Scalia goes as far as he can in accusing both of malfeasance, corruption and, well, dishonesty.

The increasingly corrupt and pernicious purveyors of the legal system in the United States make predicting what should be the most straightforward of rulings virtually impossible. An irrepressible appetite to further a politically inspired agenda has replaced the Constitution as the foundation of American jurisprudence. Such a disgraceful and dangerous perversion of the most senior of American courts “…ignores the American people’s decision to give Congress “[a]ll legislative Powers” enumerated in the Constitution. Art. I, §1. They made Congress, not this Court, responsible for both making laws and mending them.”

But the Supreme Court, with Chief Justice Roberts in the lead, has twice “mended” the Affordable Care Act, improperly re-writing and willingly—shall it be called misinterpreting—both the text and the clearly presented desires of Congress.

America’s conservatives have lost the Supreme Court to the corruption and perversity of the left. As wanton dishonesty has replaced honor and integrity on the bench, it is difficult to imagine a time or means of returning the Court to an honest application of constitutional law.