Tag Archives: Islam

Obama is not serious about defeating ISIL

 

By Jim Emerson, staff writer

Mullah Obama, Secretary of State Hanoi Kerry and defense stooge Hegel have no idea what they are talking about when it comes to ISIL. Insisting that they will not allow boots on the ground is not only pure political posturing on the part of America’s fearless triumvirate, it’s just plain stupid. They are hoping that cowardly Iraqi security forces and the so-called “moderate” Syrian rebels will be America’s proxy army in the fight against fellow Muslims. Obama ordered the CIA train and arm these so-called moderate Muslims and thus was born ISIS. What in the world are these over-educated political windbags thinking when they use rebels that are actively killing Christians in Syria to fight a terrorist group killing Christians in Iraq?  According to The Hill “moderate Syrian rebels and the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) had reportedly struck a cease-fire deal.” (2) Yet the only people taking the fight to ISIL are the Kurds! Funny how the team of White House ensconced ex-senators never seems to mention them.

Ignoring the Warfighters

The Obama administration believes it possible to defeat the nation’s enemies through the use of airpower, intelligence, drones, and counter terrorism measures. And after receiving congressional approval for this joke of a strategy, Obama & Co believe they can totally ignore military advisors. (1)  The Great One’s lounge lizard assistants don’t have time to listen to America’s expert military strategists, preferring instead to depend upon their own, unreliable proxy forces. Obama brags of a coalition of more than 40 countries. But who are they and what are they bringing to the fight? How many of them will be used for rendition?  During the past year it has become obvious that Obama’s mistrust of senior military leadership has created a rift between the warfighter and the Commander-in-Chief. Mr. Obama has continued the policy of not permitting the United States Military to take the fight to the enemy.

Political posturing will not defeat ISIL. Although Obama’s current strategy is little more than a pathetic and dangerous joke, to the dependably low-information, Democrat voter it will undoubtedly sound brilliant as it brings brainless voters to the polls in November. Don’t be surprised to see a major bust of ISIS supporters in the United States as an October surprise.

 

Sources:

  1. 1.       http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/rift-widens-between-obama-us-military-over-strategy-to-fight-islamic-state/2014/09/18/ebdb422e-3f5c-11e4-b03f-de718edeb92f_story.html
  2. 2.       http://thehill.com/policy/international/217645-syrian-rebels-isis-agree-to-non-aggression-pact

 

Viciously anti-American Maxine Waters says Sharia Law and our Constitution can co-exist

 

By Kevin “Coach” Collins

The stink of nervous sweat must be filling the air in the rooms where House Democrats meet. It must be palpable. The conversations about what to do must be totally free-wheeling and without boundaries. Questions of integrity and true patriotism are likely being pushed aside. Survival and maintaining power are the only things that matter. Never one to be concerned about looking anti-American, the extremely self-absorbed Maxine Waters had a thought cross her malevolent mind: “Let’s suck up to the Islamists who are here to kill Americans!”    

Her latest attacks on America came at a recent meeting of the Council of Pakistan Affairs and Islamic Society of Orange County California. Starting from the Democrat, anti-American position that our Constitution is controversial, Waters let loose her spew of hatred for Americanism.  

Waters than made her obligatory accusation against Republicans “attacking the Islamic faith as a national security threat,” which should be true but is not.

From there she supported our enemies by labeling any unfavorable characterization of Sharia Law as “fear mongering.”

Sucking up to the beheaders to get them to contribute to equally anti-American Democrats, the shameless Waters said she is “pushing legislation to ban any racial profiling.”

Knowing how far removed from American culture these Islamists are, Waters probably got a big round of applause for that line.    

She made light of the threats posed by Sharia Law and Islam, which she believes to be compatible with our Constitution, adding that, “… the Muslim community is actively working with law enforcement.”

Given the manifest danger Sharia driven, Islamic savages have already visited upon our society, it is impossible to believe there can be anything but evil intent on the part of those who support Islamic law; but Democrats do so openly.

That someone with such a high position on our government could speak like this is both a monument to greed and lust for power and a blaring warning that Democrats cannot ever be allowed to run our lives.  

This latest episode once again underscores that Democrats have no love of our country and would sell our freedoms to any of our enemies in order to get and maintain power.

Someone should gently inform Maxine Waters that the seventh century savages that adhere to Sharia law are here already and would have no second thoughts about raping old Black women from California, even ones that helped them gain power.

Source: http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2014/09/renowned-legal-scholar-rep-maxine.html#more  

Learn the truth about Democrats. Get your free PDF of Coach’s book “Crooks Thugs& Bigots : the lost, hidden and changed history of the Democrat Party.” Just ask at kcoachc@gmail.com  

 

Why are the left and their Jihadist allies after our guns?

By Jerry Todd, staff writer

In my humble opinion, the answer is simple. “Progressivism” is one half of the culture of death, having no regard for the sanctity of human life from conception to natural death.

The other half of this culture of death is radical Islam which is the ultimate expression of “church and state” gone mad wherein it authorizes itself to murder any who disagree with them, regardless of religion or non. These same expect an eternal reward for martyring themselves in the process of murdering innocents.  This is called spiritual warfare – the bloodiest kind as history proves.

This is the perfect eugenic combination to “lay waste to the world and all that is in it” to yield the “progressive” goal of reducing human population by 80%  to “save the planet.” Like it or not, they are in cahoots. Which is the greater fool? The jihadist, the “progressives” or we the people for tolerating their dangerous and demonic nonsense?

Barack Hussein Obama as “ruler” of an as yet unoccupied “Muslim nation” in conducting jihad against us. His actions and pronouncements are proof enough for even a communist to understand. Why else would the Russians and Chinese, who have more than their share of Islamic terrorism to deal with, be standing against us? Don’t our President and State Department project USA as a Muslim nation by who we support and arm and who we undermine?

Arming jihad while disarming Americans is a natural strategy of warfare and a favorite “progressive” tactic to support their plans for a one world government.

Here is how to deal with ISIS and all the other brands of the same goal, as recommended by Jim Coles III, a military correspondent for 34 years who has seen action on several fronts and lived among these people.

1.  Have a private sit down with the Russians and Chinese. Offer this deal: we all have trouble with those assholes … let’s put our ambitions and differences aside while we target our primary Muslim antagonists … that lets us focus on our separate problems, direct all of our resources to eradicating these creeps and not have to dilute our strength by facing each other down.. We can pick up our power competition when we’re finished with the animals. Russia: we won’t criticize when you slaughter all the Chechens. China: have at the Ouiggers … our lips will be zipped. We might even cooperate where Muslim issues overlap our areas of interest … we can work on that as the needs arise.

2.  That deal made, we quietly rotate the Pacific B-52 fleet from Guam to Diego Garcia Island. We take one squadron of F-22 Raptors out of South Korea, one maintenance and refueling wing out of Pacific Air Forces, Hawaii and rotate two squadrons of B1B Lancer bombers from Dyess AFB, Texas and station all at Ali A Salem airbase, Kuwait. Employ the AWACS planes based in Qatar …

3.  Use national asset satellites and Global Hawk surveillance aircraft to locate and grid every IS military asset and facility … put USSOCOM teams and USAF FACs on the ground to track IS troop/equipment movements and locate IS-Syrian ADA assets; plot initial ADA degradation missions.

4.  On day-1 launch special electronics UAVs to paint IS/Syrian ADA radars with false aircraft images to make them light up their radars … F-22s attack ADA sites … take down radars, destroy Class 1 and 2 anti-air systems. Repeat as necessary until the integrated ADA network is destroyed,

5.  Day-1 part 2: B1Bs attack comms nodes .

6.  Days 2-7: F-22s lead, clear the way, attack Syrian air bases and sortied aircraft … naval-Marine carrier based bombers/FA planes sustain tactical attacks.

7.  Day 8-30: B-52s engage in round-the-clock strategic bombing … drive IS forces into kill zones. US Airborne and Ranger/Force Reconn execute US forces in the kill zones. US forces depart the AO, Repeat as necessary.

8.  Final phase: as surviving IS units go to ground in urban areas insert NATO artillery and Apache (AH-64) units to support Free Syrian Army, Iraqi and other Arab troops who clear the cities.

Estimated time of the campaign — two months. Zero to low US casualties. Low allied losses.

Then we, the Russians and Chinese can get back to being idiots.

 

Barack Obama and the ISIS Speech are Hollywood at its worst

By Jim Emerson,  staff writer

Obama’s ISIS speech was well-rehearsed theatrics. Look for Breitbart to release the name of the Hollywood big wig who directed the President, for this was the first time in his political career that he acted presidential to the American people.  As for substance it was embarrassing. His strategy was similar to Clinton’s “Wag-the Dog” airstrikes on Serbia. Mister Obama believes he can defeat ISIS with airstrikes and the introduction of proxy Armies to fight a war that will most likely be directed by NATO. He is using America’s Libyan military tactics to fight ISIS. The kicker is Obama wants to continue sending aid and weapons to the Syrian rebels to fight Assad. Surely America’s smartest ever president has to know that this is how ISIS acquired its supplies and training in the first place. Maybe Barack is hoping that an al-Qaeda/Muslim Brotherhood partnership will join the fight to topple ISIS. Air power is a wonderful thing but only boots on the ground are capable of taking territory. 

Now let’s make two things clear: 1) ISIL is not “Islamic.” 2) No religion condones the killing of innocents and the vast majority of ISIL’s victims have been Muslim.

The leader of the Islamic State is Amir al-Mu’minin Caliph Ibrahim, formally Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the holder of a PHD in Islamic studies.  On 29 June 2014, he announced the establishment of a caliphate and declared himself Caliph Ibrahim. Conceptually, a caliphate represents a sovereign state of the entire Muslim faithful. Doing something in the name of religion is not necessarily a sign of the religious. After all ISIS is doing what the Islamic prophet Muhammad commanded in the Quran. As for the killing of innocents, many followers of the various sects of Islam have been proficient in the killing of innocents and proudly display videos on the net. One day soon, the media may show a protest by American Muslims condemning the actions of Jihadis, but don’t hold your breath. Silence is acceptance and since he studied Islam in Indonesia, Obama knows it’s OK to lie to infidels if it furthers the cause of Islam. If the prophet Muhammad were alive today many of the same people would condemn him as not being “Islamic.”

As I have said in recent articles, American forces will not have a combat mission. We will not get dragged into another ground war in Iraq.

Obama’s speech was purely political. As for the events that led to his decision to go to war against ISIS, Obama didn’t care what they were doing viewing them as the junior varsity of Islamic terrorism. Of course Obama did believe it important to squeeze in a presser about the murder of James Foley before his tee time. The speech was nothing more than a Hollywood production designed to make himself look like a leader and help Democrats running for re-election in November.

Obama’s insistence that U.S. forces on the ground will not have a combat mission is a farce. In the current political climate, Democrats know that coffins arriving at Dover AFB will hurt their chances for re-election. As Commander-in-Chief,  Obama no longer trusts his military in a ground war against ISIS. And he must keep faith with the liberal base by staying out of Iraq. His poll numbers have reached an all-time low and that has undoubtedly damaged his massive ego a bit.

The White House claims this is not a war. But dropping 500 lb. bombs on armed thugs in their occupied territory is war.

Sooner or later, Obama will be forced to deal with it.

 

Democrat Brad Sherman tries to sound relevant and intelligent but still doesn’t get it

 

By Kevin “Coach” Collins

California Congressman Brad Sherman is a senior member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee so he must be a smart guy who knows what he is talking about, right? Well no, not right.  In a C-SPAN interview Sherman made the “profound” point that “If you destroy one power in the Middle East, you empower the other side, and the four groups that are fighting ISIS now are in many ways nearly as evil as ISIS itself, and in fact, those who are fighting against ISIS today on the ground have killed far more Americans than ISIS has.”

Saying that a group that replaces a defeated ISIS would be, “nearly as evil as ISIS itself,” should do nothing to dissuade Barack Obama or anybody from crushing ISIS. Even if a new group took ISIS’s place that would be a trade up for the free people of the world and a great first step. Nevertheless, the logic here seems to escape Sherman.

His failure to understand the value of crushing ISIS is a reminder of the overarching blind spot liberals have for understanding the concept of “dynamic scoring.” To liberal Democrats things that happen in our world always only follow a linear path. Thus since two and two is four in a calculator, in their view two and two will always result in four in real world situations as well.

This becomes very clear when liberals are in control of a level of government and decide they need still more of our money to buy votes. They will look at an item that is currently taxed at say $1.00 per unit and conclude that since 100,000 of those units are typically sold each year providing a $100,000 in tax revenue, if they double the tax to $2.00 per unit they will double the yield to $200,000! When consumers resist and either don’t buy as many of these items or go to a nearby jurisdiction to buy them, causing a net loss of income they never learn the dynamic scoring lesson.

Sherman and other Democrats can’t understand that if ISIS is flattened, dynamic scoring will take the fight out of other groups in the region. Our Islamic enemies can read and watching television gets the word to those who can’t. If the job is done right they won’t be quick to sign up to fight a military with planes and rockets.

Liberal Democrats just don’t get that we are fighting seventh century savages that respect brutal force and little else.      

Source: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/melanie-hunter/dem-congressman-forces-will-rise-if-isis-destroyed-are-nearly-evil-isis