Tag Archives: liberalism

Chicago’s Dems treat Black CPS students like farm animals because they can

 

By Kevin “Coach” Collins

As in other districts across the country, Blacks in Chicago would rather cut off their hand than vote Republican. After all, “Democrats are their friends and Republicans hate them,” as they have been taught to believe all of their lives as inmates on the Donkey’s plantation. 

In return for ALWAYS voting Democrat, Windy City Blacks have gotten welfare dollars, housing and everything else they could want except safe streets and good schools which they have long since given up demanding. Nevertheless, now they might be learning that when you cut a deal with Satan he always lies and always demands more than you thought you were giving him.

A case in point is the Democrat run Chicago Public School (CPS) system’s handling of its responsibilities toward its students. Because Blacks have blindly handed over total control of their lives to the Democrats, they now have no say in the prurient and disgusting “sex education” curriculum CPS is offering to their eleven year old sons and daughters.

Like so many other big city public school systems, the CPS is infected with perverts who have total freedom to force any perverted filth they care to on innocent children. 

It was only by fortunate happenstance that the perverts’ plans were uncovered when they brazenly, and most likely proudly, showed a slide presentation to shocked parents.  It detailed how they intended to teach “proper” anal intercourse methods to eleven year olds.

Black students in the CPS make up 84% of its enrollment so there is little doubt that callous disregard for the morals and sensibilities of Chicago’s Black families means nothing to the perverts who proposed this curriculum.  It should be of little comfort to the parents involved that a CPS spokesman has issued a statement saying this garbage “…is not and never was part of the student sexual education curriculum.”   

Notwithstanding the CPS’s denial, an examination of available school websites proves that the curriculum was indeed used in at least one school. The proof is that a disclaimer stating that a slide show demonstrating how to use a female anal intercourse condom was added to its website.         

Research also revealed that the CPS also teaches eleven and twelve year olds that the “morning after pill” is “NOT an abortion pill;” and it has adopted a policy providing 12 year olds with “reproductive services” without parental consent.

CPS’s treatment of its students can rightfully be compared with animal husbandry, but of course the media will never make that assertion. Blacks in Chicago are now prisoners in a jail of their own making; selling themselves to the Democrats has led to this terrible situation.

Sources: http://libertyunyielding.com/2014/11/16/chicago-parents-shocked-over-fifth-grade-sex-ed-curriculum-video/

http://www.wbez.org/series/curious-city/why-so-few-white-kids-land-cps-%E2

Get your free PDF of Coach’s book “Crooks Thugs& Bigots: the lost, hidden and changed history of the Democrat Party.” If you don’t know the truth all you’ll have is Democrat lies.

Just ask at kcoachc@gmail.com

 

Obama thanks New England for its support with a finger in its eye

 

By Kevin “Coach” Collins

New England is beyond a doubt the most socialist section of the country. For all their talk about “Boston Strong” and “Hearty New Englanders,” they are the most committed supporters of Democrat liberals. Last Wednesday their loyalty to Barack Obama was rewarded with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) crushing blow to New England’s cod fishing industry.

Obama’s henchmen at NOAA placed a, “six-month ban on most cod fishing off New England this week and are threatening to cut next year’s catch by up to 75 percent.” Given the extent of the damage this ban will do, observers have estimated that it will destroy the livelihoods of people in and out of the fishing business throughout the deep blue region.    

The cynically timed, post-election NOAA edict, which takes effect immediately, shuts down fishing from Provincetown, Massachusetts to the Canadian border. No cod trawling may take place in the Gulf of Maine until April 30, 2015.

On hearing of this crippling announcement from Obama’s NOAA, a Gloucester fisherman gasped, “It’s all over! I’m done. My grandfather’s done it, [cod trawling] my father’s done it. I brought my kids into doing it.”

Now stuck in Obama’s web, he explained that his craft is not equipped to continue operations. His boat, which he uses to haul in between 700 and 2500 pounds of cod a day, is too small to make the round trip far enough away from NOAA’s clutches  to continue normal operations.  

This assault on New England’s economy is nothing new; their allowable catch was cut by 77% in 2013.  The liberal suckers in the region should have known better but of course they just can’t figure out the connection between voting Democrat and seeing their lives destroyed.   

Recent history shows that the federal government has issued wide fluctuations in its estimate of the size of the cod schools off the coast of New England.  As usual the Obama Administration uses whatever numbers it thinks it can get away with as it tightens its grip on every aspect of our economy.

By reflexively voting Democrat, the dupes in New England empower their tormentors to walk all over them.

Source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/11/12/noaa-puts-ban-on-cod-fishing-hurts-family-businesses-and-coastal-communities/

Get your free PDF of Coach’s book “Crooks Thugs& Bigots: the lost, hidden and changed history of the Democrat Party.” If you don’t know the truth all you’ll have are Democrat lies.

Just ask at kcoachc@gmail.com

 

Red State people are just better than Blue State people and here’s the proof

By Kevin “Coach” Collins

We’ve known liberals are cheap, miserly (dare I say niggardly?) in their approach to charity which actually requires giving one’s own money away instead of passing laws to force the rest of us to fund charitable causes.

Those who followed politics during the embarrassment of the Clinton brothel years remember that Bill Clinton donated his used underwear to charity in order to gain a tax credit. This fits right in with new data on who gives and who does not give.

We now have proof that liberals are cheap and conservatives are generous. A recent report from The Chronicle of Philanthropy reveals that wealthier – more liberal – Americans gave less money to charity in 2012 than they gave in 2006. Conversely, poorer people gave more during the same period.    

The 17 most generous states all voted for Mitt Romney in 2012 and not surprisingly, the seven least generous states voted for Barack Obama.  

Clearly people understand that being charitable means a bit of personal sacrifice on their part. The breakdown of charitable giving shows that by region, the South, our most conservative region, is the most giving and the Northeast, which is the most liberal part of the country is the least charitable.   

The city that is on top of the giving list is Salt Lake City and the least giving town is Hartford, Connecticut.

By every measure poverty actually correlated with giving. The more poverty in an area, the more generous the area is in helping others.  

Religious people are more charitable. Those in Utah, Mississippi, Alabama and Tennessee–all very religious states–are the biggest givers in the country.  The least religious state of all—Vermont–is just a touch better at giving than its irreligious neighbor New Hampshire.

This probably has to do with the fact that New Hampshire has been infected by liberals who, having destroyed Boston, have moved to bedroom communities in the Granite State.

Boston and Hartford are joined at the bottom as the cheapest liberal cities by San Jose and Providence.  

We of the Red States are better people. We are better by every measure; and in many ways we pull the wagon of American exceptionalism which parasites in the Blue States are happy to sit in.

Source: http://www.ibtimes.com/charitable-giving-state-are-republicans-more-generous-democrats-or-just-more-religious-1700059

Get your free PDF of Coach’s book “Crooks Thugs& Bigots: the lost, hidden and changed history of the Democrat Party.” If you don’t know the truth all you’ll have is Democrat lies.

Just ask at kcoachc@gmail.com

 

Why are the left and their Jihadist allies after our guns?

By Jerry Todd, staff writer

In my humble opinion, the answer is simple. “Progressivism” is one half of the culture of death, having no regard for the sanctity of human life from conception to natural death.

The other half of this culture of death is radical Islam which is the ultimate expression of “church and state” gone mad wherein it authorizes itself to murder any who disagree with them, regardless of religion or non. These same expect an eternal reward for martyring themselves in the process of murdering innocents.  This is called spiritual warfare – the bloodiest kind as history proves.

This is the perfect eugenic combination to “lay waste to the world and all that is in it” to yield the “progressive” goal of reducing human population by 80%  to “save the planet.” Like it or not, they are in cahoots. Which is the greater fool? The jihadist, the “progressives” or we the people for tolerating their dangerous and demonic nonsense?

Barack Hussein Obama as “ruler” of an as yet unoccupied “Muslim nation” in conducting jihad against us. His actions and pronouncements are proof enough for even a communist to understand. Why else would the Russians and Chinese, who have more than their share of Islamic terrorism to deal with, be standing against us? Don’t our President and State Department project USA as a Muslim nation by who we support and arm and who we undermine?

Arming jihad while disarming Americans is a natural strategy of warfare and a favorite “progressive” tactic to support their plans for a one world government.

Here is how to deal with ISIS and all the other brands of the same goal, as recommended by Jim Coles III, a military correspondent for 34 years who has seen action on several fronts and lived among these people.

1.  Have a private sit down with the Russians and Chinese. Offer this deal: we all have trouble with those assholes … let’s put our ambitions and differences aside while we target our primary Muslim antagonists … that lets us focus on our separate problems, direct all of our resources to eradicating these creeps and not have to dilute our strength by facing each other down.. We can pick up our power competition when we’re finished with the animals. Russia: we won’t criticize when you slaughter all the Chechens. China: have at the Ouiggers … our lips will be zipped. We might even cooperate where Muslim issues overlap our areas of interest … we can work on that as the needs arise.

2.  That deal made, we quietly rotate the Pacific B-52 fleet from Guam to Diego Garcia Island. We take one squadron of F-22 Raptors out of South Korea, one maintenance and refueling wing out of Pacific Air Forces, Hawaii and rotate two squadrons of B1B Lancer bombers from Dyess AFB, Texas and station all at Ali A Salem airbase, Kuwait. Employ the AWACS planes based in Qatar …

3.  Use national asset satellites and Global Hawk surveillance aircraft to locate and grid every IS military asset and facility … put USSOCOM teams and USAF FACs on the ground to track IS troop/equipment movements and locate IS-Syrian ADA assets; plot initial ADA degradation missions.

4.  On day-1 launch special electronics UAVs to paint IS/Syrian ADA radars with false aircraft images to make them light up their radars … F-22s attack ADA sites … take down radars, destroy Class 1 and 2 anti-air systems. Repeat as necessary until the integrated ADA network is destroyed,

5.  Day-1 part 2: B1Bs attack comms nodes .

6.  Days 2-7: F-22s lead, clear the way, attack Syrian air bases and sortied aircraft … naval-Marine carrier based bombers/FA planes sustain tactical attacks.

7.  Day 8-30: B-52s engage in round-the-clock strategic bombing … drive IS forces into kill zones. US Airborne and Ranger/Force Reconn execute US forces in the kill zones. US forces depart the AO, Repeat as necessary.

8.  Final phase: as surviving IS units go to ground in urban areas insert NATO artillery and Apache (AH-64) units to support Free Syrian Army, Iraqi and other Arab troops who clear the cities.

Estimated time of the campaign — two months. Zero to low US casualties. Low allied losses.

Then we, the Russians and Chinese can get back to being idiots.

 

Democrat Brad Sherman tries to sound relevant and intelligent but still doesn’t get it

 

By Kevin “Coach” Collins

California Congressman Brad Sherman is a senior member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee so he must be a smart guy who knows what he is talking about, right? Well no, not right.  In a C-SPAN interview Sherman made the “profound” point that “If you destroy one power in the Middle East, you empower the other side, and the four groups that are fighting ISIS now are in many ways nearly as evil as ISIS itself, and in fact, those who are fighting against ISIS today on the ground have killed far more Americans than ISIS has.”

Saying that a group that replaces a defeated ISIS would be, “nearly as evil as ISIS itself,” should do nothing to dissuade Barack Obama or anybody from crushing ISIS. Even if a new group took ISIS’s place that would be a trade up for the free people of the world and a great first step. Nevertheless, the logic here seems to escape Sherman.

His failure to understand the value of crushing ISIS is a reminder of the overarching blind spot liberals have for understanding the concept of “dynamic scoring.” To liberal Democrats things that happen in our world always only follow a linear path. Thus since two and two is four in a calculator, in their view two and two will always result in four in real world situations as well.

This becomes very clear when liberals are in control of a level of government and decide they need still more of our money to buy votes. They will look at an item that is currently taxed at say $1.00 per unit and conclude that since 100,000 of those units are typically sold each year providing a $100,000 in tax revenue, if they double the tax to $2.00 per unit they will double the yield to $200,000! When consumers resist and either don’t buy as many of these items or go to a nearby jurisdiction to buy them, causing a net loss of income they never learn the dynamic scoring lesson.

Sherman and other Democrats can’t understand that if ISIS is flattened, dynamic scoring will take the fight out of other groups in the region. Our Islamic enemies can read and watching television gets the word to those who can’t. If the job is done right they won’t be quick to sign up to fight a military with planes and rockets.

Liberal Democrats just don’t get that we are fighting seventh century savages that respect brutal force and little else.      

Source: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/melanie-hunter/dem-congressman-forces-will-rise-if-isis-destroyed-are-nearly-evil-isis