Tag Archives: Muslim Brotherhood

Barack Obama: Poll Driven Warrior

 

By Jim Emerson, staff writer

President Obama is now at war with the Islamic State and al Qaeda in Syria and Iraq. The Nobel peace prize winner attempted to put Egypt and Libya under the control of The Muslim Brotherhood. He tried to enlist NATO to aid in the overthrow of Syrian President Assad. Isn’t it remarkable that the Nobel Prize winner has started more wars that the “cowboy” President Bush? Obama expects to win this war with airpower alone but he will soon be forced to reluctantly admit that it will not be won during his regime. After all, the current war is being waged because of lackluster poll results. Rarely do such ego-driven fights turn out well.

The Khorasan group

The Khorasan group is al-Qaeda’s cell in Syria, dedicated to plotting a terror attack against the United States. The group was decimated by a barrage of Tomahawk missiles but not destroyed. The group was put together by jihadists who knew Osama bin Laden during the creation of al-Qaeda. They were assembled in Syria under supervision of senior al-Qaeda leadership. Islamic State founder Abu Bakr al-Bagdahdi was a former leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq. Of course, post-strike photos and deliberately incomplete assessments are more likely to generate positive poll results than  the truth.

Despite the wishes of this White House, al-Qaeda is alive and still dangerous. These terrorists must be met head-on and fought in a ground war, but coffins arriving at Dover AFB will only generate negative poll results, especially when it is revealed that American forces are using rubber bullets, if they are permitted to fight at all.

UN Speech

Mullah Obama read from his teleprompter that “the cancer of violent extremism” embodied in terrorist organizations now dominates his foreign-policy agenda behind global warming. He used the time at the United Nations to beg other countries to join a greatly exaggerated coalition to perform the heavy lifting in the fight against the Islamic State. The only mid-eastern countries fighting are Kingdoms which consider the Islamic State caliphate a threat to their own nations. The press seems to ignore the Kurds and nonparticipants Turkey and Egypt. Who can blame Egypt? Mullah Obama had a moment of clarity when he pointed out that “The only language understood by killers like this is the language of force.” It was the same speech in which he declared a “war on war” is needed to ensure a peaceful future. Nice line but certainly meaningless coming from the likes of Barack Obama. Then again, maybe it resulted in a few good poll numbers.

The only things Obama is serious about are tee times and low poll numbers resulting from inactivity in the face of Islamic terrorism. As Barack won’t be running again, it’s a safe bet that the former are of far greater interest to him than the latter.

 

 

Barack Obama and the ISIS Speech are Hollywood at its worst

By Jim Emerson,  staff writer

Obama’s ISIS speech was well-rehearsed theatrics. Look for Breitbart to release the name of the Hollywood big wig who directed the President, for this was the first time in his political career that he acted presidential to the American people.  As for substance it was embarrassing. His strategy was similar to Clinton’s “Wag-the Dog” airstrikes on Serbia. Mister Obama believes he can defeat ISIS with airstrikes and the introduction of proxy Armies to fight a war that will most likely be directed by NATO. He is using America’s Libyan military tactics to fight ISIS. The kicker is Obama wants to continue sending aid and weapons to the Syrian rebels to fight Assad. Surely America’s smartest ever president has to know that this is how ISIS acquired its supplies and training in the first place. Maybe Barack is hoping that an al-Qaeda/Muslim Brotherhood partnership will join the fight to topple ISIS. Air power is a wonderful thing but only boots on the ground are capable of taking territory. 

Now let’s make two things clear: 1) ISIL is not “Islamic.” 2) No religion condones the killing of innocents and the vast majority of ISIL’s victims have been Muslim.

The leader of the Islamic State is Amir al-Mu’minin Caliph Ibrahim, formally Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the holder of a PHD in Islamic studies.  On 29 June 2014, he announced the establishment of a caliphate and declared himself Caliph Ibrahim. Conceptually, a caliphate represents a sovereign state of the entire Muslim faithful. Doing something in the name of religion is not necessarily a sign of the religious. After all ISIS is doing what the Islamic prophet Muhammad commanded in the Quran. As for the killing of innocents, many followers of the various sects of Islam have been proficient in the killing of innocents and proudly display videos on the net. One day soon, the media may show a protest by American Muslims condemning the actions of Jihadis, but don’t hold your breath. Silence is acceptance and since he studied Islam in Indonesia, Obama knows it’s OK to lie to infidels if it furthers the cause of Islam. If the prophet Muhammad were alive today many of the same people would condemn him as not being “Islamic.”

As I have said in recent articles, American forces will not have a combat mission. We will not get dragged into another ground war in Iraq.

Obama’s speech was purely political. As for the events that led to his decision to go to war against ISIS, Obama didn’t care what they were doing viewing them as the junior varsity of Islamic terrorism. Of course Obama did believe it important to squeeze in a presser about the murder of James Foley before his tee time. The speech was nothing more than a Hollywood production designed to make himself look like a leader and help Democrats running for re-election in November.

Obama’s insistence that U.S. forces on the ground will not have a combat mission is a farce. In the current political climate, Democrats know that coffins arriving at Dover AFB will hurt their chances for re-election. As Commander-in-Chief,  Obama no longer trusts his military in a ground war against ISIS. And he must keep faith with the liberal base by staying out of Iraq. His poll numbers have reached an all-time low and that has undoubtedly damaged his massive ego a bit.

The White House claims this is not a war. But dropping 500 lb. bombs on armed thugs in their occupied territory is war.

Sooner or later, Obama will be forced to deal with it.

 

Preventing Genocide is not A Core Interest of Mullah Obama’s Caliphate

By Jim Emerson,  staff writer

Obama press secretary Josh Earnest was asked by Fox News if preventing genocide of the Christian minority in Northern Iraq “Counts as being in America’s core interests.” (1) He answered that any military option to save the lives of innocent Iraqis would be handled on a case by case basis and that the only lasting solution for the situation in Iraq is political. Well the administration needs either a serious reality check or an enema as the Islamic State isn’t interested in negotiations or political solutions. Until the al-Qaeda spin-off is dealt with the brutality they unleash on their enemies they will not be deterred by token airstrikes or the mindless pandering rhetoric of Misters Obama or Kerry.

The capture of Mosul and Qaraqoush has forced Iraqi Christians to flee with the Yazidi minority into the mountains of the Kurdish region. The Kurds are more tolerant of Christianity and other minority religions, unlike the Islamic State which intends to wipe them out.

Airstrikes
The New York Times reported information provided by Kurdish officials about airstrike targeting ISIS Jihadists in the Kurdish towns of Gwer and Mahmour.  (2) Believing it to have been American planes attacking ISIS, the residents of the towns began celebrating. The Pentagon denied any American involvement, reporting that either Iraqi, Russian or the Turkish Air Forces were conducting the airstrikes. It was also suggested that Iran may be involved in order to assist their Shiite brethren.   

Kurdish officials said the bombings had initially targeted ISIS fighters who had seized the two towns.  A top Iraqi official in Baghdad close to Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki said that Americans had consulted with the Iraqi government Thursday night about starting the campaign. The government reportedly agreed and the bombing began.

Another disaster
Obama’s previous military and diplomatic involvement in the Middle East led only to disaster, at least for the existing nations involved, as the head of each country was removed and absolute authority was handed to the Muslim Brotherhood.  These were “solutions” which benefitted only Barack Obama and his Jihadist allies.

Now it is reported that Barack is quietly calling for the removal of Prime Minister Maliki. (2) Mr. Obama has approved humanitarian airdrops for the population fleeing into in the Kurdish regions but will not approve any military strikes till the Prime Minister steps down. By then it will too late.

Update: Two US F-18′s launched a strike against an ISIS position near Erbil, the city which serves as the Kurdish capital. The Pentagon said “ISIS was using artillery [in the area] to shell Kurdish forces defending Erbil.”

Sources:
(1)   http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/08/07/white-house-wont-commit-on-stopping-potential-genocide-in-iraq-but-weighing/
(2)   http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/08/world/middleeast/obama-weighs-military-strikes-to-aid-trapped-iraqis-officials say.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&version=Banner&module=span-ab-top-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

(3)  http://weaselzippers.us/195845-breaking-u-s-launches-second-round-of-airstrikes-on-islamic-state-forces/

ISIS and its caliphate represent a direct challenge to al Qaeda and the rest of the Muslim world

By Jim Emerson,  staff writer

The Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham’s (ISIS) was unheard of by the west until a few weeks ago. The al-Qaeda spin-off/startup rapidly invaded and captured large swathes of Iraq and Syria. Inspired by its successes, ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi declared the captured lands a caliphate.  

A caliphate is an Islamic state led by a supreme religious and political leader known as a caliph. Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi has been declared the caliph, an earthly successor to Muhammad who will rule over the Islamic state. Al-Baghdadi developed an Islamic Army and has enjoyed more success in a shorter period of time than the Muslim Brotherhood and al Qaeda combined. To date the Islamic State has about 12,000 fighters and a war chest estimated at £1.2 billion. (3)

Call for Loyalty
The self-appointed caliph called for all Muslims to become part of his caliphate and spread Islam around the world acting as emissaries under his direction and control. He tells the faithful they have a duty to migrate to the Islamic State and make the newly formed nation a land for all Muslims. His supporters are telling Muslims worldwide to pledge allegiance to the new caliphate and their new leader.  

Muslims are being called to join the jihad against all non-believers around the world. The Caliph has called for an escalation of fighting during the holy month of Ramadan as there is no better time for jihad in the name of Allah. He calls for soldier’s, doctors and engineers to build the new Islamic state.

Not so fast.
The Iraqis, Iranians, Syrian and Russians are not too happy with a Sunni lead Caliphate occupying valuable oil fields in their back yards and Iranians do not like a Sunni Islamic State so close to their Shia State. Rival Islamist groups including al-Qaeda and its allies are not too thrilled with a Caliphate over which they have no control. And the Saudis are getting nervous as al Baghdadi may well pose a threat to their Kingdom. It was, after all, the Saudis along with Obama who provided ISIS with money and arms. The last thing they want is this dangerous, hyper-arrogant killer going rogue.

Sources:

1.    http://townhall.com/columnists/rachelmarsden/2014/07/02/is-us-being-duped-into-funding-jihadist-startup-n1857897/page/full

2.    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/2/islamic-state-vows-conquest-rome-soldiers-islamic-/

3.    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iraq/10940820/Al-Baghdadis-Caliphate-mocked-by-al-Qaeda-mentor.html

Obama still arming and Training the Syrian Rebels and their al Qaeda partners

by Jim Emerson,  staff writer

Not wavering from his foreign policy mission of aiding the Muslim Brotherhood to restore an Islamic Caliphate under their control, Mr. Obama has ordered the training and arming of Syrian jihadists to overthrow Assad. Current reports indicate that the forces loyal to Assad are gaining ground against the Muslim Brotherhood supported rebels and the Obama administration’s goal of creating a national Army of at least 30,000 fighters to take on the 200,000 man Syrian Army.

The Muslims in the White House are also providing clandestine support to the Syrians rebels. Feeling emboldened by the Arab spring uprisings in Libya and Egypt, for the last three years the Administration has attempted to use American and NATO aircraft to create a no fly zone to protect the Syrian rebels and their al Qaeda allies (Al-Nusra and ISIS). The plan was soundly rejected by the American and international communities, but that didn’t deter Obama.

In fact, unable to leave Syria alone, Obama ordered the CIA and most likely U.S. military advisors to train and supply the Christian murdering rebels in an attempt to remove Syrian President Assad. Of course the CIA cannot act alone. It requires a Presidential order from either Mr. Obama or the real power, Valerie Jarrett to carry out such a mission. According to a PBS FRONTLINE documentary, the rebels are being supplied from Turkish bases and trained in Qatar in a facility near the Saudi Arabian border.

The terrorists-in-waiting would receive three weeks of lessons in setting up ambushes, raids and proper weapons drills. The rebels were trained to kill off enemy survivors and gather intelligence. Upon graduation they would receive new uniforms and boots. No picture of their benefactor, mullah Obama or a Geneva Convention card. Anyone supported by the Muslim brotherhood and their military arm, al Qaeda, are terrorists and Syrian rebels are no different. (1)(3) Any support for one side or the other in Syria is akin to being between Scylla and Charybdis.

The American population does not support any plan that would squander troops in another senseless war in a country that does not present a danger to the U.S. When the Obama regime proposed bombing the Assad forces after a supposed chemical attack (without knowing who used the weapons), the American people and the international community rejected the Nobel Peace Prize winner’s warmongering proposal. Thanks to PBS, Obama will learn that America supplied arms to the rebels against the wishes of congress that the U.S. provide non-lethal aid only; that is, food, clothing and medical supplies.

The revelations from the Syrian rebels prove that once again, American has been lied to by the Community Organizer in Chief. 

Sources:

1.    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/foreign-affairs-defense/syria-arming-the-rebels/syrian-rebels-describe-u-s-backed-training-in-qatar/
2.    http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/04/25/the-big-weapons-that-the-u-s-may-be-secretly-supplying-to-the-syrian-rebels.html
3.    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/foreign-affairs-defense/syria-arming-the-rebels/how-to-train-a-rebel-army-secretly-in-seven-steps/