Tag Archives: Obama

Obama doesn’t want to take your guns…honest!

By Doug Book, Editor

If Americans have learned anything about the zealots who claim to seek “common sense” solutions to the non-existent epidemic of gun violence it’s that they will never be satisfied until Big Brother has stripped every law abiding gun owner of every weapon.

Last week, Coach is Right published “Nobody Wants to Take Your Guns,” an article which reveals the true intentions of 2nd Amendment foes from the late Senator John Chafee to Handgun Control Inc, prior to its transformation into the Brady Bunch. And GUN CONTROL SHEEPthe agenda of the left has not changed over the years.

During a recent appearance on Boston Public Radio (WGBH), Boston Police Commissioner Bill Evans said:

“For the most part, nobody in the city needs a shotgun, nobody needs a rifle and… especially here in the city I want to have discretion over who’s getting any type of gun because public safety is my main concern.”

Evans puts the arrogance of the left on full display as he presumes to decide what gun owners need and what, if anything, they should be permitted to have. Imagine the outcry should a conservative GUN REGISTRATION AND CONFISCATIONclaim the authority to decide whether liberals need to speak and what, if anything, they should be permitted to say! What? Treat First Amendment rights with the same degree of contempt liberals have for our 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms?

Most Americans have caught on to the fabrications of our Liar in Chief as he declares his respect for the 2nd Amendment. During his campaign against John McCain, Obama said “I have no intention of taking away folks’ guns.” Some three weeks ago, the left succumbed to a state of rapture over Obama’s shedding of crocodile tears as he announced his Executive Orders against gun ownership. Even so, few Americans were fooled when he told his audience, “I believe in the 2nd Amendment.”

Yet Obama never tires of proclaiming his appreciation for the right to keep and bear arms. Do his actions mirror his words?

During his political life, Obama:

supported legislation to “close the gun show loophole” which would have imprisoned show organizers if a single person at a show offered a gun for sale privately.   GUN CONTROL AND CHICAGO

opposed a bill in the Illinois legislature which would have protected homeowners from weapons charges if they used an “illegal” gun in self-defense.

voted to ban gun stores within five miles of a school or park, which would have eliminated most gun stores in America.

proposed to make it a felony for a gun owner whose firearm was stolen from his residence which caused harm to another person if that weapon was not securely stored in that home.”

supported a federal ban on concealed carry laws. As a Presidential candidate he told the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review “‘I am not in favor of concealed weapons,’ as ‘I think that creates a potential atmosphere wGUN CONTROL 9here more innocent people could (get shot during) altercations.’”

Obama also said he believes in the “common-sense” gun laws of Australia and England, which required mass confiscation and gun bans.

Examples of Barack’s deeds not supporting his pro-2nd Amendment claims go on and on. Yet he keeps telling the same obvious lies. Does he really believe the American people are that stupid?

Sure! After all, they elected HIM twice.

Trump, really?

By John Velisek USN (Ret), staff writer

Yes Trump, really. The brash, self-promoting candidate has captured the imagination and the support of Americans across the nation. It’s no secret that the GOP Establishment (GOPe) has made him feel unwelcome; that they consider his advocates low information and uneducated. And it’s hardly a surprise that Karl Rove should wish to preside over the candidate’s downfall. After TRUMP THIRD PARTYall, Donald is someone whose thoughts and actions he can’t control. The fact is neither of our political parties have much use for either “loose cannons” or patriots. Both, it seems, are unmanageable.

According to POLITICO, I am an average Trump supporter; that is, a middle income, blue collar worker. But what Trump is saying has resonated with far more than just blue collar voters. Independents, higher income Republicans and Democrats, even 25% of minority voters favor Trump over any of the DC, “Uniparty” candidates. His words are resonating with those who see our country going down a hole, who will no longer tolerate the effects of political correctness and kowtowing to the members of every self-proclaimed “victim” class.

Trump followers represent a large swath of the electorate. Democrats are losing the non-college voters in the Midwest. More importantly they have lost the Reagan Democrats who foolishly gave Barack Hussein a chance to make things better. These voters obama_liesno longer maintain any illusions about “Hope and Change” and no longer trust the far left to handle the economy, immigration or terrorists.

The citizens of this country are looking for a strong leader who understands the damage caused by decades of liberal rule. Americans are fed up with political corruption and legislation which violates the rights guaranteed in the Constitution. Most of us don’t react well to force, whether it be purchase ObamaCare or pay a penalty, or submit to the homosexual agenda or lose your place of business. Government must threaten citizens into compliance with its commands when it does not represent the values or appreciate the culture of those citizens. Eight years of legislation by Executive Order have made the un-American agenda of the Obama Regime abundantly clear.

Word now coming out of the GOPe is that Trump has followers who will not bother to vote. They claim that Trump will burn out, that he is a shill for the Democrats, that his followers will fall by the wayside and that political polls are totally wrong. No doubt a RINOS AND TRAITORSgoodly number of D.C. Republicans will not support him. But most of these will be of the John McCain, Lindsey Graham stripe; RINO/Uniparty Republicans willing to watch the U.S. descend into perpetual mediocrity as long as they maintain the power necessary to steal with impunity. Some members of the GOPe have declared that they would vote for Hillary before they vote for Trump. I would easily believe this of at least half a dozen Republican senators who have found subservience preferable to doing the job they were elected to do.

JEB BORDER GREETER
The candidate who knows what is best for his flock

Many of the lesser Republican candidates-Jeb Bush in particular-feel entitled. They’re convinced that they have worked long and hard, have said all the right things, done all the right things, taken all the right money and therefore believe they should be President. Many of these same GOPe’s look with contempt upon the people whose votes they need. The unwashed masses are necessary evils, often ignored. After all, campaigns are for big time donors who have the candidate’s ear. To Jeb it is probably beyond comprehension that the masses have the audacity to find him wanting.

I believe Trump will be a much bigger favorite among Republicans than Hillary is likely to be among Democrats. In fact she probably would have been dumped by now if the Democrat Party could look BERNIE SANDERS 10to anyone but Bernie Sanders, a 74 year old, European style socialist whose belief system has caused massive damage to every nation foolish enough to have discarded liberty and capitalism. Consider how readily Hillary was tossed aside 8 years ago for an incompetent, inexperienced Black whose entire life history had to be covered up and perpetually re-written. It seems the smartest woman who ever lived is not exactly popular, even with her fellow leftists.

Yes, Trump is often a flamethrower. But he has found a way to not only be a fresh voice that the electorate likes, but to have that voice carried 24/7 by the mass media for most of his candidacy.

Former President Ronald Reagan had an 11th commandment to never trash a fellow Republican. Some people have forgotten that. Those who call Trump a loudmouth of no substance have shown that they are the ones who should tone down the rhetoric and work together to create a consensus for the party.

Donald Trump can win this election. He can also be a very good president. Whether Democrat, Republican or Independent, as Americans we had better make certain the next White House occupant is not a member of the far left. We can’t afford another 8 years of anti-American treachery.

Obama’s “Common Sense” Gun Control will Outlaw Owners, rather than Guns

By John Velisek USN (Ret), staff writer

OBAMA TEARS AND GUN CONTROL
Barack O’Hamlet

There was a press conference last week during which our President, that paragon of emotional sincerity, used crocodile tears, straw men and outright lies to excuse his continuing, unconstitutional assault on the 2nd Amendment. The performance, delivered before dependable White House sycophants, was that of a “soft dictator;” the words, those of a demagogue. Obama even had the gall to use Communist China as an example of “common sense” gun control.

Barack discussed the ever popular “Gun Show Loophole” which, contrary to the lies of the progressive left, does not exist. Sales between private individuals residing in the same state are legal, whether they take place at a gun show or in a living room. No background check is required. Licensed gun dealers who attend gun shows must, by law, do a background check before selling a firearm, just as if the sale were being conducted in their place of business.

The purpose of the left lamenting the dangers of the “gun show loophole” is simply to outlaw private sales between two people. Were liberals actually interested they would find that “…less than 1% of guns used in crimes were boOBAMA AND GUN CONTROL TEARSught at a gun show.”

In order to keep up with the times, the gun show loophole has evolved into the “Internet Sales Loophole.” Once again liberals claim that there is no background check of the buyer. The fact is that all weapons purchased on line may only be delivered to the prospective buyer by a licensed gun dealer after a background check has been performed.

In January of 2013, Obama introduced 23 Executive Actions to “reduce gun violence.” Five of the 23 involved “…a new federal reliance on the sharing of information gleaned from background checks.”  This shared information was to be provided to the Centers for Disease Control, the federal bureaucracy chosen by Obama to oversee a study of gun violence in the United States. It was the idea of the gun control culture to transform gun ownership OBAMA AND GUN CONTROL AND OBAMACAREinto a question of public health. “The academic community chose to study gun violence as a public health problem, partly because, according to the [CDC directed] study, ‘Violence, including firearm related violence, has been shown to be contagious. Therefore, gun violence is being studied in the same manner of a contagious disease.’” 

This “common sense” approach of equating the 2nd Amendment to the common cold will transform your doctor into a member of law enforcement, requiring and empowering him to inform the federal government about the state of your mental health. The opinion of a physician will now guarantee that your name “…makes its way into the NICS as prohibited.” 

Here in California the state legislature has gone even further, allowing any family member or acquaintance to notify law enforcement if they feel you are “mentally unstable.” Officials will then have license to confiscate your firearms. Can you imagine a young man breaking up with his girlfriend, or a grown man divorcing his wife and this nonsensical law being used for revenge!

SMART GUN
Smart Gun Technology. What could possibly go wrong!

Not surprisingly, Obama also returned to the “common sense” advantages of the “Smart Gun”— a pistol designed to work only for its designated owner. Of course, the technology involved places the price of a handgun and necessary accoutrements at $2500 to as much as $4,000. The manufacturer of the most “efficient” Smart weapons can only guarantee that their pistols will fire about 90% of the time…more or less. The State of New Jersey passed legislation in 2002, requiring Smart guns to eventually replace all regular, privately owned pistols. For some reason, however, police officers are exempt from the law!

By the way, Smart weapons will feature a microchip embedded somewhere within the weapon. These chips can apparently be deactivated at any time—either deliberately or accidentally as the case may be. Gives one trying to protect home and family quite a feeling of confidence knowing that a neighbor’s garage door opener could deactivate his pistol. Does anyone doubt Big Brother would “turn off” all of the privately owned firearms in the nation should he have the ability?

Much of this is old stuff.

What’s not old is the “Fact Sheet” released by the White House on January 4th which makes it clear that Obama intends to outlaw gun owners, not guns. The left has generally failed in its attempts to do GUN CONTROL 3away with “Assault Weapons,” .50 Caliber rifles–the list grows with each passing year. Well the agenda has now changed:

Current law prohibits individuals from buying a gun if, because of a mental health issue, they are either a danger to themselves or others or are unable to manage their own affairs. The Social Security Administration (SSA) has indicated that it will begin the rulemaking process to ensure that appropriate information in its records is reported to NICS. The reporting that SSA, in consultation with the Department of Justice, is expected to require will cover appropriate records of the approximately 75,000 people each year who have a documented mental health issue, receive disability benefits, and are unable to manage those benefits because of their mental impairment, or who have been found by a state or federal court to be legally incompetent…”

Once placed on the NICS list as “mentally incompetent,” not only will be impossible to purchase a weapon but all weapons currently owned must be surrendered to the state under penalty of—well, GUN CONTROL, CANNONS, FREEDOMwhatever Big Brother can dream up! Perhaps your bank account will be seized; wages garnished; an IRS levy means the government could confiscate your home and any other owned property; Social Security checks can be stopped dead…

Don’t for one moment believe that a government which is supposed to serve you, will hesitate to destroy you. And all because Aunt Margaret, whose apple pie you insulted, chose to report you to the local sheriff as a “danger to yourself and others.”

Obama believes he can defeat ISIS with a good Public Relations Plan

By Jim Emerson, staff writer

Reeling from his idiotic “ISIS is contained” comment as the terror group killed 129 civilians in Paris, Obama is being perceived by the world as a leader with no coherent strategy and perhaps no particular interest in taking on Islamic murderers. After IISLAM MUSLIMS TERRORISTSSIS took credit for the terror attacks in Paris, Obama’s lack of a serious policy for fighting terrorism was exposed. And ISIS was no longer contained in the Middle East.

ISIS has demonstrated an ability to strike wherever they please, revealing Obama’s ISIS containment policy as nothing more than a pipe dream. The administration couldn’t spin the embarrassing disconnect between Obama’s claims and the spectacular set of coordinated attacks that shocked the world. The White House’s global fight against extremists is pathetically short on action and, as with all things “Obama,” long on talk and political posturing. Russia and France are leading the fight while America is sitting on the bench. MUSLIMS ISLAM TERRORISM 3

Obama has decided to blame his less than stellar performance as Commander in Chief on his administration’s faulty communication skills. That is, his strategy to contain the Islamic State didn’t work because it wasn’t clearly communicated to the American public or around the world. Only Obama would have the audacity to make such an idiotic claim.

Yet here he is, facing criticism at home and abroad for having no cogent plan to confront and defeat the world’s most dangerous terror organization. Only Barack Obama would find no shame in being considered feeble and incompetent when compared with the President of France who is taking the fight to the terrorists on their home turf. Russian forces are in Syria. But Obama is making his case for a steady and persistent campaign to shrink IOBAMA EXCUSESSIS territory using air power, drones and indigenous ground forces.

And let’s not forget diplomacy. History has shown sub-human, Islamic terrorists to be very receptive to laying down their arms for fear of receiving a moderate rebuke from a weak American president.

In short, the Regime will pass the entire mess off to the next administration and then criticize their response-whatever it may be- on MSNBC. Regardless of their policy, Obama will claim that his Administration did a superior job.  And it’s a safe bet that the media will give him a pass.

In the coming months, the White House will implement a full court Public Relations press to provide the American people with the appearance that the administration is actively conducting a winning campaign. And why not! It wasn’t long ago that the Regime hoped to convince Americans that the Benghazi attack was triggered by a YouTube video!

The Regime’s Public Relations scams are no longer working because the public knows that nothing which comes from the Obama White House can be depended upon as fact. But it hardly matters. Obama only needs to lie and cheat for one more year.

Thank God for that.

Our Non Serious President

By John Velisek USN (Ret), staff writer

Immediately after the San Bernardino murders, the Obama Regime instructed the FBI and other state and federal entities to keep the name of the shooters off the air and unknown to the American public. This was done in order that the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), a Muslim Brotherhood and Jihadist front group, could be ahead of the curve in forming the narrative on the killings. And that is what happened as CAIR representatives contacted the brother-in-law of one of the shooters and plopped him in front of cameras at a CAIR-arranged press conference.

FAROOK BRO IN LAW
Farhan Khan (left); CAIR L.A. Executive Director Hussam Ayloush (right)

“There’s no comment. I mean, [the] investigation is going on. You would know what it is. I have no idea. I have no idea. Why would he do that? Why would he do something like this? I have absolutely no idea. I am in shock myself. I’m [a] normal person.” Such was the rambling, disconnected drivel offered by Farhan Khan, brother-in-law of San Bernardino killer Saeed Farouk, when asked if there was a religious element involved in the attack. According to Khan’s on-the-spot handler, CAIR-LA Executive Director Hussam Ayloush: “We don’t know the motive. Is it work, rage-related? Is it mental illness? Is it extreme ideology? At this point it’s really unknown to us and it is too soon for us to speculate.” Just 48 hours later, Ayloush lay claim to the blame-America narrative offered by leftists after 9/11 when he said, “Let’s not forget that some of our own foreign policy, as Americans, as the West, have fueled that extremism.” “We are partly responsible.”

CAIR is more than happy to blame America, our culture, our way of life and our beliefs for the attacks of Islamic terrorists. Obama, of course, is aligned with Islamic apologists throughout the country in blaming guns for events like that in San Bernardino. Raising the spectre of “weak” gun laws is an effective way to turn the attention OBAMA AND MUSLIMSof some Americans away from the failures of this administration; failures that include a woefully inadequate vetting process for refugees and immigrants.

Obama managed events after the killings in order that they might be in line with his narrative about Islamic Terrorism being so rare that criticism of Muslims must be driven by Islamophobia and not facts. Those facts, however, tell us that San Bernardino was “…the “75th Islamist-inspired terrorist attack or plot in the U.S.” since Sept. 11, 2001.

Political correctness, when added to the dangerous, anti-American agenda of Barack Obama will be the downfall of the country unless the American People wake up to the facts as they are. We have the “Clock Boy” suing for $15 million in what appears to be a dry run for additional money making schemes. Such plots effectively silence those who would otherwise “see something and say something.” It worked well enough that the neighbors of Saeed Farooq didn’t say anything about what they thought was a MUSLIMS AND OBAMAsuspicious situation.

The American people are under attack, but Barack Obama claims our fears are unfounded, that we are wrong to react in a way that Regime sycophants equate with Islamophobia. We have an administration that not only ignores the threats leveled at Americans, it helps to spread the ideology of our terrorist enemies. 

I didn’t agree with George Bush on everything, but at least I knew he was serious about providing a defense for this country and for the people in it.

Barack Obama is a non serious president; non serious about everything except advancing the agenda of the far left. That makes him a danger to the American people and to the nation.