|
|
By Coach Collins, on February 12th, 2012% By Suzanne Eovaldi, staff writer
“This is an outrage, an absolute outrage,” Attorney Orly Taitz told a radio audience in Western New York. She believes Judge Michael Malihi, a Clinton era appointee, is from Iran which could have a bearing if he is steeped in Sharia Law. When he brought down a favorable decision for Obama’s appearing on state ballots, Taitz sent by overnight courier a 23 page appeal to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp pleading with him to ignore the judge’s advisory decision – to no avail.
Kemp rubber stamped the Malihi decision, and now the appeal process begins in earnest. Plaintiff attorney J. Mark Hatfield will escalate this case to the appellate level immediately. With emergency appeals well in place before Georgia’s March 6 Super Tuesday, Hatfield told World Net Daily: ”I will be filing that on behalf of Carl Swensson and Kevin Richard Powell just as soon as … Continue Reading:Whose law did Judge Malihi use to make his ruling?
By Coach Collins, on February 9th, 2012% by Doug Book, staff writer
Though Georgia Administrative Judge Michael Malihi claimed to have issued a decision based upon “the law as well as the evidence,” we now know he made proper use of neither. For the Judge had no evidence in the Court record upon which to base his assertion of “fact” that Obama “was born in the United States.” And the Indiana Appeals Court decision to which Judge Malihi looked for his ONLY guidance made a thoroughly incorrect interpretation of existing case law. (1) p3
In short, Judge Malihi’s decision wouldn’t pass muster in a first year law school classroom.
“The court can only rest its finding of fact on evidence that is part of the court record.” This is a rule of evidence of the superior court as stated by Attorney Mario Apuzzo. Yet only plaintiff’s evidence was contained in Malihi’s Court record and the Judge concluded that their claims were “not persuasive.” … Continue Reading:Georgia eligibility decision based on legal blunders
By Coach Collins, on February 9th, 2012% by Doug Book, staff writer
On February 3rd a much anticipated decision was issued by Georgia Administrative Judge Michael Malihi, recommending that Secretary of State Brian Kemp allow Barack Hussein Obama to appear on the state ballot as a candidate for President.
Given previous rulings by Judge Malihi in the Obama case, many had assumed things might go badly for the acting president. Yet the judge’s 10 page decision could hardly have done more to accommodate defendant Obama and his attorney, especially in light of their having ignored court orders, subpoenas and the hearing itself.
And many of those who have reviewed Judge Malihi’s decision find it to be supported by neither fact nor law.
Of the statements made by the judge in his decision, the following are among the most objectionable to legal observers:
1.) “This decision is entirely based on the law, as well as the evidence and legal arguments presented at … Continue Reading:The Georgia, Obama eligibility decision: legally incorrect and ethically indefensible
By Coach Collins, on January 29th, 2012% by Doug Book, staff writer
Though we’ll not know the outcome of the Georgia hearing regarding ballot eligibility for the nation’s number 1 undocumented worker until the first part of February, Barack Obama’s high-powered attorney apparently suffered an attack of rapid, shallow breathing just before the courtroom drama was about to unfold.
One day prior to the scheduled hearing before Administrative Judge Michael Malihi, Obama attorney Michael Jablonski addressed both a letter to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp AND an email, directed to the Secretary via one of the court’s hearing officers, asking Kemp to cancel the hearing.
Georgia law allows “any elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate” to file an objection to that candidate’s inclusion on the State ballot. (1)
Such objection filings go to the Secretary of State who makes a determination to either overrule or pass them along to the State Administrative Court for disposition. Michael Malihi was the … Continue Reading:Obama attorney knows eligibility hearing was disaster for the president
By Coach Collins, on January 29th, 2012% By Suzanne Eovaldi, staff writer “I’ve never seen anything like this,” Private Investigator Susan Daniels told Judge Michael Malihi under oath, as she reviewed her research into Barack Obama’s social security numbers investigation! Her analysis centered on a Connecticut resident “born in 1890″ whose official registration somehow is mixed in with the Obama social security investigation. Testimony at the court hearing of Barack Obama’s eligibility to be placed on the Georgia ballot for reelection in 2012 revealed stunning sworn facts that clearly places into question the sitting president’s authenticity. In an interview after the administrative hearing, Daniels said, “I discovered immediately. . .( that social security number) was fraudulent. . .was.. no way it was accurate.” The live internet video stream suddenly went black when she said, “He’s using a . . . “ While I was able to glean some startling testimony, other witness responses to Attorney Orly Taitz’s questioning seemed garbled and had certain interruptions at … Continue Reading:What witnesses testified to at Obama’s Georgia citizenship hearing
|
Coach’s Radio Schedule
The Wake Up Call
Tuesday 8:30am Eastern |
Ken Walsh from WFTW,
Fort Walton Beach, Florida. 1260AM or listen live online. |
The Captain's America
Every Weekend
Online |
Matt Bruce from Sarasota Florida,
the nationally syndicated
Captain's America.
|
|
Loading ...
Recent Comments