Tag Archives: political correctness

New York Times quotes convicted perjurer to lie about NYPD

By Kevin “Coach” Collins

“All the news that’s fit to print,” the motto of the New York Times is a cynical lie perpetuated to fool its smug liberal readers into feeling validated in their narrow world view.  

Like most liberals the New York Times has clung to the fantasy that Islam is the, “Religion of Peace.”  Since it is demonstrably false one can only assume the cowards at the Times are knowingly lying and bias in how they select what news is “fit to print.”

The Times has been carrying the water for Comrade Bill de Blasio’s efforts to give the Islamists a freer hand to carry out their ongoing Jihad against New York City.

On May 11th and May 12th they published a story and an editorial attacking the NYPD’s anti-terrorism unit’s tactic of trying to enlist Muslims as informers who would warn the police of terror plots being hatched by fellow Muslims.

The “news” story featured a man named Bobby Hadid, a fired police officer. It quotes him as asking, “What does that have to do with terrorism?” when presented with evidence of terrorist plots produced by spying on those who have declared themselves our enemies.  

Hadid’s “question” became the driving point to the Times’ article because it validated their subversive position on terrorism.  

Hadid was fired by the NYPD because he was convicted of perjury in a murder case. But  in the twisted logic of the Times’ “all the news that’s fit to print” motto, informing readers Hadid was a convicted liar didn’t “fit” until the 33ard paragraph thus hiding it in plain sight.    

The Times made no attempt to impeach Hadid’s credibility because he was, “…convicted of perjury in a case unrelated to his counterterrorism work.” Really?

The New York Times is on the side of the terrorists and will help them at every opportunity. It wants terrorists tried in civilian courts in Manhattan where they can be freed by far Leftist juries. The Times is worried about the “potentially uncomfortable” nexus between crime-fighting and anti-terrorism.”

The feckless liars at the Times will use whatever means they can to undermine the efforts of the Police Department to protect the people of New York because they have deluded themselves to believe it is the cops that are the enemy and the “Religion of Peace” is the victim.

This is another reminder of why we can never turn our back on the liberal media.

Source: http://nypost.com/2014/05/28/times-anti-cop-agenda-is-all-the-slop-thats-fit-to-print/

Media provides cover for more black criminals than just Barack Obama

By George Spelvin,  staff writer

“Blacks are only a small percentage of our community (but) the courthouse is filled with them,” says a long-serving public defender who writes under the pen name of Michael Smith in order to protect himself and his family.  “The halls and gallery benches are overflowing with black defendants, families, and crime victims,” says the attorney. (1)  “For blacks, the courthouse is like a carnival…they all seem to know each other…hundreds and hundreds each day, gossiping, laughing loudly, waving and crowding the halls.”

Public defender Smith is finally opening up after many years of dancing to the tune of flawed media and legal systems which are confounded by the constraints of America’s, all-powerful directives on political correctness. It is an abomination that will not permit holding responsible a very small percentage of our population.  Reading the entire “confessional” of Defender Smith can be compared to taking a walk on the wild side of our country’s judicial system.  And his strongest words of condemnation are lobbed at our mainstream media for failing in their mission to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth!

“The media invariably sugarcoat black behavior.  Even the news reports of the very crimes I dealt with in court were slanted,” Smith says.  He goes on to paint a very dismal picture of television news coverage that “intentionally” refuses to tell all of the facts about an accused black client.  The public defender points to the media refusing to name any names that obviously sound or appear to identify a defendant as being black!  The media in America are deliberately obfuscating news coverage in order to confuse and deceive the American public by misrepresenting the truth.  Lying by omission is still lying.  The notion of keeping the body politic fully informed is being defiled every day.  A recent Fox news poll reveals that only SEVEN PERCENT of journalists identify themselves as Republican!  The rest shake out as Democrats or Independent, but the Independent label is merely a dodge to conceal their true loyalties.

Black defendants often insult authority figures by either calling them by their first names such as “Mike,” or even worse by calling a legal figure “DOG!”  Rolling his eyes at “Mike,” the young black male, who fails to realize the serious and very precarious situation he faces, complains about everything “Mike” tells him.  The public defender, who early on in his confessional reveals he is a liberal, tells readers what really goes on in court. “If I slip and use adult language, they get angry because they think I am flaunting my authority,” says “Mike.”  The young man’s “cellie,” that is cell mate, appears to carry more authority than the public defender who must compete with “cellie” in explaining the law.

But as is so often said, the cover up is worse than the crime.  And here the media’s cover up of the dysfunction of America’s young black males is our country’s biggest social threat.  The average citizen who is either not being told what is going on, doesn’t want to know or believes nothing can be done anyway is being victimized as well.  A family’s secrets will never be healed as long as silence prevails.  The media mantra of political correctness destroys America’s abused and abusers every day.  This essay needs to be a must read in every newsroom and courtroom and in every American home!  Tell the pubic the truth so we all can and will heal!

SOURCE:  (1) (2) all quotes and references come from    http://www.amren.com/features/2014/05/confessions-of-a-public-defender/


White men are devils, blacks and liberals the avenging angels of justice


by Suzanne Eovaldi

That White People, especially White Men, are Devils is the governing mantra of the Upstate New York Five Percenters cult as featured on the expensive gold medallion worn by rapper Jay Z at a recent Barclay Center, NY Nets basketball game. (1) Reported by NY Post contributor Gary Buiso, Five Percenters believe that a black man created the universe, a black man is God and a black man is physically and intellectually stronger, all according to guru author Michael Muhammed Knight who converted to Islam in his teens.

“Whiteness is weak and wicked and inferior,” according to the Post story that reveals what is really behind the excoriation of the white, billionaire businessman, itself a protected class in the obscene media world of political correctness. (2) The designation “Five Percenters derives from a Nation of Islam belief that 5% of humanity are the righteous teachers” who need to enlighten the ignorant masses about what truth really is.
We need to admit, as skeptics of what passes for journalism today, that the outrageous confiscation of private property by The Man is really about an Islamic power grab, a minority grab for America’s wealth and power.  And it’s working! When you think about what is really going on, that a man’s business empire is being subjected to forced sale by a governing body under control of the cult of Political Correctness, any fair-minded individual must react in total disgust! It is a case of private remarks being used against an LA Clippers owner who built a failing enterprise into the huge money maker it now is. 

Donald Sterling was speaking in HIS OWN HOME, in his PRIVATE SANCTUARY, taped by a minority “friend” who zapped him because she could. In other words, America has degenerated into what Europe has been for years–a nation under control of the thought police.  Recall that recently a British politician was arrested for anti-Islamic remarks expressed during a political debate!
Let’s take a look at what the satanic mainstream media just ignores, namely a like offense by another protected class, the individual member being Jay Z, husband of the obscenely wealthy pop singer Beyoncé. Although Jay Z was filmed proudly wearing an extremely inflammatory medallion which portrays white men as devils, our “media” culture simply ignored this racist statement by a cult of hate. “A coaster sized golden pendant” swung obviously to and from Jay Z’s neck to proclaim his feelings that “black man is God, black man created the universe,” and on and on. But where is the angst of Don Lemon, Wolf Blitzer, or the crowd of MSNBC sycophants, especially Al Sharpton who use their enormous media power to advance the takeover of America by anti-Christian forces? (3)
And what about the “outrage” of enforcer Adam Silver, he of the same protected class as the Clippers’ owner, who acted so swiftly and so extremely?  Silver conveniently failed to note any hurtful remarks hurled by minorities at each other in locker room chit chat. Remember the hapless Ricky Incognito who was forced into sensitivity training nirvana?  He got so upset that he bought a very expensive car which he promptly kicked in at the Tire Zone. Media wise guys chortled that the guy needed counseling. Yet according to a dumbfounded, ESPN talking head, Donald Sterling was so upset that on the night the PC outrage hit, the billionaire went to a favorite steak house to enjoy a great meal.
What is really going on here?  Look to message board commenters to once again hit the nail on the head. “Open your eyes. People seek the power they can possess. . .they want supernatural power over their enemies and to achieve goals and accumulate possessions…” (4)  Isn’t this what’s really going on?  “The Man” is forcing confiscation of the private property of a very wealthy American citizen to fulfill the Obama dictate of redistribution of private wealth!

Isn’t this really an offensive yet very successful attack on America’s Constitution and Bill of Rights?” When private thoughts expressed in one’s own home, can fuel a world wide, internet-transcribed drum beat for use by a corrupt mainstream American media, haven’t these evil doers achieved Obama’s 2008 aim–namely to fundamentally transform the United States?


(1) (2) (3) http://nypost.com/2014/04/06/jay-zs-medallion-bears-logo-of-five-percent-radical-group

(4)  www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/?p=13267

Political Correctness out of control

by Jim Emerson,  staff writer

The physical demands of combat positions make for jobs that only a few men and even fewer woman are capable of performing. In a headlong rush to satisfy the utopian stupidity of political correctness, the Washington establishment insistence that women be allowed in combat positions will only emasculate the military that protected this country since its founding.

This week the Marine Corps announced that fewer than half of female recruits were capable of meeting the minimum standards required for combat jobs. These requirements are the same for males and females in basic training. In an effort to conform to political correctness, the Marine Corps delayed implementation of the minimum requirements for women, fearing that they might lose female recruits and those already serving who cannot meet standards. These standards just happen to apply to men as well, some of whom are also not fit for infantry training. (1)

The debate
This news rekindled the debate about whether women have the physical strength for a front line combat position. The delay of standards for combat-ready troops is an indication that the overwhelming majority of women are simply not capable of serving in front line units. President of the Center for Military Readiness, Elaine Donnelly told the Associated Press that “Awarding gender-normed scores so that women can succeed lowers standards for all. Women will suffer more injuries and resentment they do not deserve and men will be less prepared for the demands of direct ground combat.”

The culture war to diminish the status of military services attempts to erase the biological differences between men and women. Hard work is no longer appreciated, just as the role of education today is to castrate male students. (2) Camille Paglia told the Wall Street Journal “This PC gender politics thing—the way gender is being taught in the universities—in a very anti-male way, it’s all about neutralization of maleness,” and  “Masculinity is just becoming something that is imitated from the movies. There’s nothing left. There’s no room for anything manly right now.”  Men are no longer allowed to be men and women will no longer be allowed to women. The integration of women into combat is the latest step towards the general wussification of America.


1.    http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/24349599/marines-delay-female-fitness-plan-after-half-fail#ixzz2pHPCzD2K
2.    http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303997604579240022857012920

Cowards making military policy

by Jim Emerson,  staff writer

Retired Lt. Col. Robert Macginnis’ book DEADLY CONSEQUENCES: How Cowards Are Pushing Women into Combat, presents the facts, studies and the history of why women should not be allowed into ground combat units. Despite the modern perception of the military fighting a high tech, Nintendo-type war, any prolonged action will require face to face encounters with the enemy. The experienced infantry officer argues with facts that women should not be placed in situations where they may have to fight in close quarters or serve in Special Forces.

And “society at large” doesn’t have a clue. The political correctness, bovine excrement crowd believe that women can fight on the front line as efficiently as any man.  In order to appease the liberal forces of Congress and members of an Obama White House staff who never served a day in their life in the American military, the Armed Services will be compelled to weaken physical standards in order to allow women to serve in front line situations and in special forces.

Unfortunately, this is not an opinion but a fact. General Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has admitted as much. In a press conference announcing the rescission of the 1994 rule excluding women from ground combat units Dempsey said, “If we do decide that a particular standard is so high that a woman couldn’t make it, the burden is now on the service to come back and explain to the secretary, why is it that high?” (4)

Military readiness should never be compromised to serve the ends of political correctness or appease its cowardly proponents. And that is what so many of these people are–cowards. Spare me the ever-present anecdotes from people who “served in the military.” Fewer than ten percent of those who served have been on the ground, in-country and up close with the enemy. If any soldier, regardless of sex, can’t satisfy the same physical demands as the war fighter in a unit they need to be moved to a support position. And that is certainly nothing to be ashamed of.

The greatest insult to someone on the front line is being questioned or second guessed by a REMF (Rear Echelon Mother F’r). Today we have REMFs in Washington D.C. who believe that they are so damn smart they can dictate policy for the entire military based on theory. Yes, women can shoot a weapon and kill but the Col. argues that women lack the killer instinct needed to kill the enemy in squalid situations for a sustained combat operation. (2) “The Joint Chiefs have stopped being soldiers and are now just well-trained ‘yes men’ to whatever administration occupies the White House.” (1)

England and Russia experimented with women in combat. Low information cowards may argue that Russians had success with female combatants during World War II. Well then why, as Macginnis points out, did the Soviets stop using women in combat units after the Second World War? The British Army recently came to the conclusion that women do not work well in combat situations. (1)  As Col. Maginnis points out it has everything to do with a natural deficit of physical capabilities; a potential that is limited by the nature of their sex.

Women in the military perform their duties professionally and honorably.  But to lower standards and thereby risk the lives of soldiers fighting on the front line does a disservice both to those females who will be made to look incompetent and to those males who might be killed as a result.   



1.    http://www.humanevents.com/2013/07/28/book-review-deadly-consequences/
2.    http://video.foxnews.com/v/2572699266001/how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat/
3.    http://freebeacon.com/new-book-examines-role-of-women-in-combat/
4.    http://nation.time.com/2013/07/25/the-cowardly-push-to-get-women-into-combat