The United Nations Arms Trade Treaty goes into effect on December 24th. Through that date, Coach is Right will provide background and current information concerning the dangers this treaty poses to the American people and their freedom.
President Obama has been re-elected since this piece was written and Republicans secured a massive, midterm victory in 2014. The midterm results should guarantee an incoming Senate that wouldÂ not ratify the Arms Trade Treaty. But conservative voters were certainly betrayed by the vote of the Republican House on the Omnibus Spending Bill a few days ago.
First published on July 13, 2012
by Doug Book,Â staff writer
As New York City plays host to a conference which will shape the UN Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) into final form, most 2nd Amendment supporters are concerned that stealth language or overly broad applications woven into the document will serve to separate Americans from their right to keep and bear arms. After all, why else would preliminary versions of the Treaty be so difficult to obtain and U.N., pre-conference position statements remain consistently absent from the internet? Â
Barack Hussein Obama leads the most anti-gun rights Administration in the nationâs history. Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano and recently appointed, ATF Acting Director B. Todd Jones have spoken often and passionately about the importance of implementing more restrictive gun control legislation. Â
But the gun-grabbing Regime will not be able to ratify the UNâs global gun control measure without first securing a 2/3rds majority of senators to vote in favor. And it wonât be easy to convince 67 politicians to sign onto a document which countless critics have spent nearly a decade rightly representing as a worldwide assault on the 2nd Amendment. It will be especially difficult as the American public may once again be told that the document has to be âpassedâ in order to find out whatâs IN it!
Late last year the Heritage Foundation obtained an ATT âDraft Paperâ from an NGO participating in the Treaty mark-up. The Paper makes it clear that the finished product would be broad in scope, controlling everything âfrom rifle scopes to battleships.â And though the Treaty purports to monitor only âinternational arms transfers,â document language shows the UN also wishes to control âinternal transfersâ as âany firearm transferâmeaning any change in ownershipâŠmight conceivably somehow affect another nationâŠâ
Therefore the ATT will demand signatories control and monitor âtransfers including âtransportâ across national territory.â To accomplish this, a nation would necessarily âmaintain records of all imports and shipments of arms that transit their territory,â creating records on âthe type of arms transferred and their âend usersâ.â So as international records would be kept of all weapons bought and sold within the United States, the Treaty would create not only a global arms registry, but the rules by which arms may be transferred and to whom.
Would Senators sympathetic to global arms control try to slip these and other unconstitutional ATT edicts past American voters?Â
DC politiciansâincluding Republicansâhave already written purposely misleading and legally ineffective language into both the 2012 and 2013 National Defense Authorization Acts for the sole purpose of deceiving the American public into believing their constitutional rights were being looked after.Â As for treaties, they commonly include âreservations;â that is, language designed to âdefine and limit the effect of a ratified treaty.â A few dedicated, gun-grabbing Senators might get the idea of attaching a codicil to the ATT, claiming it would prevent the ratified Treaty imposing upon the 2nd Amendment rights of the American people thereby safeguarding the right to keep and bear arms.
Of course they wouldnât bother to inform Americans that the Arms Trade Treaty specifically forbids any reservations which are âincompatible with the object and purposeâ of the Treaty! Would members of the Washington political class be so dishonest as to try such an underhanded stunt?
Itâs doubtful that a sufficient number of Senators would risk the fury of the NRA and gun owning voters. But then, stranger things have certainly happened in the nationâs capitol.Â After all, a Supreme Court Chief Justice has just prostituted both himself and the Constitution!
Maybe keeping tabs on the Senate wouldnât be such a bad idea.