Tag Archives: United Nations

Will Anyone in the Regime Support Israel and Condemn Iran? Anyone?

By John Velisek USN (Ret), staff writer

So it has come to this. Obama has notified Iran that an American “military option” is off the table, as long as Iran negotiates. I, for one, always knew that Obama wouldn’t use the military in any form. But being the blustery coward he is, Barack had to make the American people believe it was possible. The next step is to agree that there will be no inspections, probably in about two weeks. He’ll say we can keep an eye on what the mullahs are doing by satellite.

This is, of course, self-defeating. Perhaps Barack doesn’t understand that the Iranians will know when our satellites pass over their nation. It probably wouldn’t be hard to schedule necessary work around those flyovers. Keep in mind Islamic law permits lying to non-believers in order to attain Allah approved goals. But who should understand subterfuge and Islamic law better than Barack Obama!

So how far will Obama go in giving the Iranians what they want? In June 2010, word was leaked from the Defense Department to the Times of London that Israel had negotiated with Saudi Arabia to use their airspace to strike targets in Iran. Once word got out, the attack was aborted. If Israel had struck then, things may be totally different today in relation to Iran nuclear weapons.

And it goes even further. The United Nations, that bastion of Anti-Semitism, has received word from Iran that it will not allow inspections. Does anyone really think the UN will do anything? It has never enforced sanctions in the past, preferring to look the other way any time sanctions have been ignored. Should the United States expect different behavior in the future?

Showing a clear contempt for Israel, Obama agreed in part with the UN Human Rights Council when it declared Israel the world’s leading human rights violator. Israel does not ban headscarves or minarets as certain other countries do. She welcomes Arabs who want to remain peacefully in Israel, bestowing upon them all the rights of an Israeli citizen. And contrary to what has often been alleged by the mainstream media, Israel allows all citizens to vote, including Arabs.

We now have Juan Williams attempting to ramp up animus between Jews and African Americans in the United States. In my mind we have already had enough of that. Leave it to Jesse and Reverend Al. Both the African American and Jewish people know that there are more agreements than disagreements. And as in Ferguson, outside agitators are there to spark unrest and lead it in the direction they want it to go.

The next step, and it didn’t take long was to blame Black anger on Republicans. I know it makes no sense, but that is to be the next talking point. Because John Boehner invited Israeli PM Netanyahu to speak to Congress and Republicans agreed, as they should have, Israel’s government is now an extension of the Republican Party, according to Williams. After all, it makes the security of Israel a partisan issue. I am still waiting for Williams or any other Leftist spokesman to explain why Obama had his people in Israel, busing in Arabs to vote against Netanyahu. ANYONE?

This administration has called Benjamin Netanyahu “chickens**t and lazy.” Obama has complained to Putin about having to deal with him, The Regime also called the Israeli PM “offensive and inappropriate” for slamming Kerry for being messianic, a word not used lightly in Israel.

And yet in Afghanistan, where we have spent more blood and treasure over that last three years than anywhere else, former President Mohammed Karzai accused American troops of the indiscriminate killing of civilians. He also claimed his country had gone backwards in the 12 years American and NATO troops have been present. Was there anyone in this Administration that condemned THAT speech? ANYONE?

And is it POSSIBLE that a nation stuck in the 8th century could even GO backwards?

Not a peep, not even a twitter.

Will anyone in the Obama Regime have Israel’s back, or will the only democracy in the Middle East have to go it alone? Can we get an answer on that from anyone? ANYONE?

Will the Senate threaten the 2nd Amendment?

The United Nations Arms Trade Treaty goes into effect on December 24th. Through that date, Coach is Right will provide background and current information concerning the dangers this treaty poses to the American people and their freedom.

President Obama has been re-elected since this piece was written and Republicans secured a massive, midterm victory in 2014. The midterm results should guarantee an incoming Senate that would  not ratify the Arms Trade Treaty. But conservative voters were certainly betrayed by the vote of the Republican House on the Omnibus Spending Bill a few days ago.

First published on July 13, 2012

by Doug Book,  staff writer

As New York City plays host to a conference which will shape the UN Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) into final form, most 2nd Amendment supporters are concerned that stealth language or overly broad applications woven into the document will serve to separate Americans from their right to keep and bear arms. After all, why else would preliminary versions of the Treaty be so difficult to obtain and U.N., pre-conference position statements remain consistently absent from the internet?  

Barack Hussein Obama leads the most anti-gun rights Administration in the nation’s history. Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano and recently appointed, ATF Acting Director B. Todd Jones have spoken often and passionately about the importance of implementing more restrictive gun control legislation.  

But the gun-grabbing Regime will not be able to ratify the UN’s global gun control measure without first securing a 2/3rds majority of senators to vote in favor. And it won’t be easy to convince 67 politicians to sign onto a document which countless critics have spent nearly a decade rightly representing as a worldwide assault on the 2nd Amendment. It will be especially difficult as the American public may once again be told that the document has to be “passed” in order to find out what’s IN it!

Late last year the Heritage Foundation obtained an ATT “Draft Paper” from an NGO participating in the Treaty mark-up. The Paper makes it clear that the finished product would be broad in scope, controlling everything “from rifle scopes to battleships.” And though the Treaty purports to monitor only “international arms transfers,” document language shows the UN also wishes to control “internal transfers” as “any firearm transfer—meaning any change in ownership…might conceivably somehow affect another nation…”

Therefore the ATT will demand signatories control and monitor “transfers including ‘transport’ across national territory.” To accomplish this, a nation would necessarily “maintain records of all imports and shipments of arms that transit their territory,” creating records on “the type of arms transferred and their ‘end users’.” So as international records would be kept of all weapons bought and sold within the United States, the Treaty would create not only a global arms registry, but the rules by which arms may be transferred and to whom.

Would Senators sympathetic to global arms control try to slip these and other unconstitutional ATT edicts past American voters? 

DC politicians—including Republicans—have already written purposely misleading and legally ineffective language into both the 2012 and 2013 National Defense Authorization Acts for the sole purpose of deceiving the American public into believing their constitutional rights were being looked after.  As for treaties, they commonly include “reservations;” that is, language designed to “define and limit the effect of a ratified treaty.” A few dedicated, gun-grabbing Senators might get the idea of attaching a codicil to the ATT, claiming it would prevent the ratified Treaty imposing upon the 2nd Amendment rights of the American people thereby safeguarding the right to keep and bear arms.

Of course they wouldn’t bother to inform Americans that the Arms Trade Treaty specifically forbids any reservations which are “incompatible with the object and purpose” of the Treaty! Would members of the Washington political class be so dishonest as to try such an underhanded stunt?

It’s doubtful that a sufficient number of Senators would risk the fury of the NRA and gun owning voters. But then, stranger things have certainly happened in the nation’s capitol.  After all, a Supreme Court Chief Justice has just prostituted both himself and the Constitution!

Maybe keeping tabs on the Senate wouldn’t be such a bad idea.

Sources:

(1) http://www.nraila.org/media/PDFs/UNArmsTradeTreaty_USSenateLetter.pdf

(2) http://propheticnewsblog.blogspot.com/2012/07/un-arms-trade-treatyloosing-our-right.html

(3) http://patricksperry.wordpress.com/2012/07/10/the-u-n-arms-trade-treaty-will-restrict-your-gun-rights/

(4) http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2012/dc3364.doc.htm

(5) http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/12/effects-of-the-un-arms-trade-treaty-on-the-us

 

 

Our 2nd Amendment rights threatened by The United Nations

 For nearly 2 decades, possible adoption of the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty has concerned gun owners who fear the deliberate destruction of their 2nd Amendment rights.

On December 24th the ATT goes into effect in the United States thanks to the signature of John Kerry on behalf of the Obama Administration. Beginning today, Coach is Right will provide background and current information on Treaty terms and what they can mean to Americans across the nation.

By Doug Book, staff writer

First published on Feb. 18, 2011

In 2006, the United Nations decided it was time to explore “…the feasibility, scope and draft parameters for a comprehensive, legally binding instrument establishing common international standards for the import, export and transfer of conventional weapons.”

The Bush administration voted against the creation of this proposed Arms Trade Treaty, believing that such oversight would be more productive on a national level. But on October 30th, 2009 Barack Hussein Obama reversed course, quite possibly turning the sovereignty of the United States, its Constitution and the rights of its gun owning public over to Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and the member states.  Many believe this decision to represent a serious threat to the right of the American people to keep and bear arms.

 Claiming that the UN treaty would affect only international arms trafficking, Hillary Clinton said, “conventional arms transfers are a crucial national security concern for the United States, and we have always supported effective action to control the international transfer of arms.” But former UN Ambassador John Bolton is not buying the international aspect. In an interview with NRA News, Bolton stated, “the administration is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nations, but there’s no doubt…that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control.” Continuing on, “…many of the implications of these negotiations are very much in their domestic application.” 

 Former congressman Bob Barr agrees with Bolton. “Even though [treaty advocates] all say ‘We are not going to involve domestic laws and the right to keep and bear arms, that won’t be affected by all this’, that’s nonsense”, he says. “There’s no way…to ensure that firearm transfers internationally don’t fall into the hands of people that the UN doesn’t like…unless you have some sort of national regulation and national tracking.” (2) Taking it even further, Bolton asserts “after the treaty is approved and it comes into force, you will find out that it…requires the Congress to adopt some measure that restricts ownership of firearms. The administration knows it cannot obtain this kind of legislation purely in a domestic context. They will use an international agreement as an excuse to get domestically what they couldn’t otherwise.” (2)

 In July of 2010, Julianne Versnel, Director of Operations for the Second Amendment Foundation, represented the Foundation as an NGO delegate at the UN Arms Trade Treaty meeting. Her report is chilling to say the least, as she writes “there appears to be little doubt that some sort of treaty will be adopted by 2014, if not by 2012. It is anticipated that the final treaty will attempt to register firearms, require micro-stamping, destruction of surplus ammunition on a very set schedule…and restriction on any transfer of arms including between private individuals…” “If the United States is a signatory and this is ratified by the US Senate, this UN treaty would be the law.”

 We know the Obama regime will sign on to this assault on the 2nd amendment. The vote of Republican senators will decide the outcome.

 To contact your Congressional Representative use this link:

http://www.contactingthecongress.org/

To read more about this story use these links:

http://www.un.org/disarmament/convarms/ArmsTradeTreaty/html/ATT.shtml  

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=116041  

http://johnlott.blogspot.com/2010/07/report-on-un-arms-trade-treaty.html

 

Israel vs the world

By Jim Emerson, staff writer

Israel has pretty much declared it is sick and tired being the target of hate by Muslim terrorists and their enablers. In a battle against the world propaganda machine, Israel finds itself as David against the Goliath of the American and UN ministries of disinformation. The U.N. has a history of blaming Israel for defending itself and had to get used to being mistreated by every Democrat leaders since the assassination of Robert Kennedy by a Palestinian.

Obama’s contempt for Israel

 
Though admitting that Israel has the right to defend itself the Obama White House is doing all it can to deny the Jewish state the ability. Obama’s support for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Libya and Syria, his non-involvement in the rise of the Islamic State and his support of al Qaeda terrorists in Syria have only emboldened the enemies of Israel. Hamas was planning a major action against the Jewish state believing that the Grand Mufti of the Great Satan would forbid the Jews from fighting back. It didn’t work.

Israel stood up against the call for a cease fire by both Barack Obama and John Kerry because she was effectively fighting back against terrorists. Israeli forces were destroying launch sites and the tunnel systems built by Palestinians for the purpose of invading Israel and killing Jewish residents. Obama was surprised and humiliated by Israel’s rejection of the one-sided, Muslim-appeasing cease fire proposal presented by Secretary Kerry. It seems the American president underestimated the unity of the Israeli public behind the war effort. Israel will no doubt be punished in the near future by the Public Housing Muslim from Kenya because the One doesn’t like opposition, least of all when it has been declared before the entire world.

The only reason Obama and Kerry called for a cease fire was because Israel was winning. The early damage to Hamas was of a strategic nature, cutting off its electricity, supply routes and sea ports.  Hamas will have a difficult time recovering from the loss of supplies and resources.

The invaluable United Nations
The UN, in its strategic brilliance, has designated public schools to be safe bomb shelters for children and civilians. In fact, the world assembly is so humanitarian it even returned the weapons stored in these buildings to Hamas! It’s no secret that Muslims will use Mosques, Hospitals and Schools as weapons caches. They have also famously used women and children as human shields.

During its operations, Israeli forces have been giving the civilian Muslim population ample warning before striking a known target. The latest incidents in which civilians were killed or injured undoubtedly involve women and children literally held in place by Muslim men. Knowing they would leave the area upon news of a warning from Israeli forces, brave Muslim fighters lock these useful martyrs in the announced target area, confident that the world media will condemn Israel for their death. Of course the UN will look the other way or risk finding its own observers among the next tally of martyrs.

Israel will have to go it alone, understanding it has the support of the majority of its own citizens and sensible people of the world.

 

Even the United Nations says Sweden is on her way to third world status, all thanks to Islam

by Kevin “Coach” Collins

Sweden the land of gentle loving people; the land of my great grandparents is rapidly committing national suicide and there is nothing anyone can do to stop it.

This harsh truth as laid out in a UN report that says Sweden has about fifteen more years before the North African Muslim hordes that are pouring across her borders completely engulf her and pull her down into rough parity with today’s third world crap holes like Libya.  

The Swedish Left has impaled their own country on a spike called “multiculturalism.” Far from the utopia these fools believed bringing in the poorest least civilized people in the world would bring about, they have irreversibly wrecked the lives of their countrymen.

Just as everywhere else, the swine in the Swedish media are aiding in the destruction of their own country, but unlike most places they are actually acting as PC storm troopers. With the help of Marxist computer experts, the Swedish media is tracking down and exposing anyone who dares speak out against this madness even if they spoke “anonymously” on line. They are publishing the addresses of these “offenders” so they can be punished for speaking out.  These quislings use Alinsky tactics of bullying and labeling to smother anyone who raises a voice in protest to what is happening.

Rapes of blond native Swedish women are becoming commonplace.  While these rapes are generally not allowed to be reported the cold truth is that about 1 in 4 Swedish women has been raped by one or more violent Muslim thug; and more than 3 of every 4 arrested rapists in Sweden is a North Africa Muslim immigrant.  Moreover, the dimwitted offspring of these thugs are destroying Sweden’s school system and have already pulled standardized test scores down to ten year lows.    

The situation in Sweden is now at a crisis point with “assimilation” now described as a “racist hateful concept” by the insane suicidal Leftist who run the country.

Shutting the doors and deportations are the only real options but that can’t happen as long as this suicidal Swedish government is in charge.

My great grandparents would weep at what has become of their country. Your prayers are needed for Sweden.

Sources:  http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2014/April/Soviet-Sweden-Model-Nation-Sliding-to-Third-World/

http://www.dailystormer.com/23-of-swedish-women-will-be-raped-by-nonwhite-immigrants/

http://www.thelocal.se/20131203/sweden-slides-in-global-education-rank-pisa-students-schools