Tag Archives: United Nations

Scientist leading effort to prosecute climate skeptics under RICO

By Marc Morano
Commentary by John Velisek USN (Ret), CiR staff writer

The letter by global warming scientists calling on President Obama to look into prosecuting climate skeptics has prompted international outcry.

Debate no more! Jailed for scientific dissent?! Twenty climate scientists, including Top UN scientist, call for RICO investigation of climate skeptics in letter to Obama

The uproar over the effort to enact racketeering charges against those who disagree with the view of dangerous man-made global   GLOBAL WARMINGwarming has just added a new twist. Dr. Roger Pielke Jr., professor of environmental studies at the Center for Science and Technology Policy Research at the University of Colorado at Boulder, has revealed the leader of the ‘RICO 20’ is a prime example of a climate profiteer.

George Mason University Professor of Climate Dynamics Jagadish Shukla is identified by Pielke Jr. as the man who spearheaded the letter demanding RICO investigation by the Obama  

Jagadish Shukla
Jagadish Shukla

Administration. Shukla was also a Lead Author with the UN IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) in 2007.”

Commentary: Well here’s a little more information on Jagadish Shukla, the top-billed signatory of the September 1st letter to President Obama, A.G. Lynch and the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, John Holdren. The letter requests that the government charge global warming deniers with being members of an ongoing criminal organization under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). No longer willing to simply vilify and slander those who disagree with climate change prophets of doom, “scientists” like Shukla now want to intimidate purveyors of climate truth into silence with massive fines and threats of imprisonment. What better way for science to get at the truth!

According to a financial report unearthed by Roger Pielke Jr., Jagadish Shukla, his wife and daughter are becoming wealthy at taxpayer expense. The George Mason professor is moving money from his government grants through a non-profit which he happens to own. The non-profit then paid out some $500,000 per year in 2013 and 2014 to Shukla and another $100,000 to his daughter. When added to his $300,000 salary from George   

King of Climate Profiteers
King of Climate Profiteers

Mason, Dr. Shukla has spent each of the past 2 years raking in $800,000 for part time work! And the best part is, none of his claims about climate change have to be true; none must be proved. He need only agree with the climate change zealots in Washington D.C. and at the United Nations and the gravy train ride will continue. Does anyone think someone collecting big money from the federal government, is not going to toe the party line?

Taxpayers are funding Shukla’s request to ignore the Constitution and criminally prosecute people who don’t happen to agree with him, regardless of facts which reveal man-made climate change to be a fraud. Clearly the climate hysteria has got to be maintained or the money would dry up.

And strangely enough, the letter signed by Shukla and 19 other climate “scientists” demanding criminal indictment of those who disagree with    GLOBAL WARMING HOAXthe, “fact” of global warming, has mysteriously disappeared from Mr. Shukla’s website. That would be the Institute of Global Environment and Society (IGES), the non-profit organization of which Shukla is the president. It is the same non-profit that has paid Shukla half a million dollars in each of the past two years.

I don’t know whether Shukla is a competent scientist, but there can be no doubt about his qualifications as a liberal. Who else would have the arrogance, the audacity to demand that anyone who disagrees with him be locked up!


Disarming America, the Final Solution?

By John Velisek USN (Ret), staff writer

A new report touted by NBC News’ Maggie Fox makes the claim that the level of firearm ownership can be correlated with homicide deaths of Law Enforcement Officers. More civilian gun ownership in a given area, more dead police. Study authors David Sewedler and David Hemenway would later admit that perhaps this homicide rate was actually driven by criminals. The “criminal offender theory” draws the not-so-remarkable conclusion that police who have frequent encounters with violent criminals are more likely to be injured or killed. Not all that surprising a proposition, is it?

Of course, gun hating members of the media aren’t interested in the legitimacy of a study, but in the claims of its authors. In this case, more police are killed in states which have more of those evil guns. It’s short, sounds reasonable and is easy to pass off as fact. What could be better!

But why has the media decided to pick yet another nationally syndicated fight with gun owners?

On September 25th of last year, Secretary of State John Kerry-acting on behalf of the president-signed the UN’s Global Arms Trade Treaty. Though it has not been ratified by the Senate, Obama’s minions traveled to the UN ArOBAMA AND KERRYms Treaty conference in Mexico on Monday, August 24th.

It’s quite clear that the purpose of the Treaty is to disarm civilian populations—that is, people deemed unauthorized by government officials to possess firearms or ammunition. But the federal government and individual states have attempted to disarm the American people before. Connecticut and New York recently passed legislation requiring owners of “assault weapons” and “large capacity” magazines to register these items with the state. It has been widely reported that more than 1 million “assault weapon” owners in the two states have publicly defied the legislation and law enforcement officials, many who refuse to enforce the law anyhow.

One purpose of the UN Small Arms Treaty is to bring an end to this spirit of freedom and defiance on the part of American gun owners. As Article 16 of the Treaty explains:

“In implementing this treaty, each State Party may seek assistance including legal or legislative assistance, institutional capacity-building, and technical, material or financial assistance. Such assistance may include management, disarmament, demobilization, model legislation and effective practices for implementation.”

So Barack Obama might dispatch U.N. forces to quell unrest in Ferguson, for example. Once accomplished, this makeshift army of mercenaries could be directed to forcibly disarm any and all   DevilObama civilians in the area. U.N. officials would have the authority to formulate the law themselves, or go back to State Department Publication 7277, which purports to work towards the goal of the small arms treaty, “where all nations have been disarmed and merged into a system of international control within standards set by the United Nations.”

And by the way, those “standards” include the disbanding of all armed forces but those contributing to the United Nations Peace Force.   UNITED NATIONS MILITARY FORCE

Barack Obama and the radical left are hoping to use the Arms Trade Treaty to affect an end run around our inalienable, constitutionally protected right to self-defense, that is, to keep and bear arms. What couldn’t be accomplished in Congress or by the Supreme Court will now take place thanks to the authority of a treaty. And according to many, use of the Fast Track trade agreement will preclude the necessity of the Senate having to ratify the Arms Trade Treaty. Obama, or any president, will have the power to impose every article of the treaty as the law of the land.

Maybe the media has picked this fight because they figure it’ll finally be a winner.

An Open Letter to Americans Everywhere

By John Porter

excerpted by Coach is Right

I have heard for a long time from thousands of people complaining about not having anyone to step up to the plate and take the reins of leadership against the army of Socialist Progressive Liberal politicians and biased Media moguls who are destroying our way of life in America. Well, here he is America. Are there things not to like about him? Sure, you may not like his, arrogance, his hair, his swagger, his tone, his brashness, insulting remarks or something   DONALD TRUMP 6 else about him. However, one must be impressed with his power of conviction and willingness to express it, political correctness be hanged.

His name is Donald Trump. A strong man, a non-politician who owes nobody anything and promises he will bring America back to strength, world leadership and economic success. A strong man who will stand in the wind against those in positions of political power in America and foreign nations and not back down.

The path will not be easy for him, but he seems strong enough to endure the meanness and the cunning roadside bombs set in his path by those in politics and media who wish to blow his legs off to destroy him.

Do you wonder why the powerful, Socialist, Progressive Leftists   TRUMP 7 groups have mounted campaigns against him? Isn’t it strange that even those in the Republican Party Hierarchy are opposed to his very presence in the field? Why? It very well may be because he is the only candidate, if elected, who will completely change the corrupt, crony culture of Washington, empty many offices, fire department heads and close some of them down completely.

Americans have grown tired of always losing. We’re losing our exceptional-ism, losing our world leadership, losing the respect of the rest of the world, losing our sovereignty to the United Nations, losing manufacturing and our jobs to other countries, losing our military strength, losing the battle of people illegally pouring into our country, losing our freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution.

We just may be at a place in our nation’s history that a nice and    politically correct person will not take the actions needed to deal effectively with the Socialists inside our country or the evil and   

REVCOM, Communist Party in New York
REVCOM, Communist Party in New York

destructive (not so nice) leaders of our foreign enemies or the demonic Islamic Terror Organizations. Think about it…..who do you feel WILL, not can, take the necessary actions to effect these sorely needed changes?


Please forward this to anyone you wish by any means you wish.


Will Anyone in the Regime Support Israel and Condemn Iran? Anyone?

By John Velisek USN (Ret), staff writer

So it has come to this. Obama has notified Iran that an American “military option” is off the table, as long as Iran negotiates. I, for one, always knew that Obama wouldn’t use the military in any form. But being the blustery coward he is, Barack had to make the American people believe it was possible. The next step is to agree that there will be no inspections, probably in about two weeks. He’ll say we can keep an eye on what the mullahs are doing by satellite.

This is, of course, self-defeating. Perhaps Barack doesn’t understand that the Iranians will know when our satellites pass over their nation. It probably wouldn’t be hard to schedule necessary work around those flyovers. Keep in mind Islamic law permits lying to non-believers in order to attain Allah approved goals. But who should understand subterfuge and Islamic law better than Barack Obama!

So how far will Obama go in giving the Iranians what they want? In June 2010, word was leaked from the Defense Department to the Times of London that Israel had negotiated with Saudi Arabia to use their airspace to strike targets in Iran. Once word got out, the attack was aborted. If Israel had struck then, things may be totally different today in relation to Iran nuclear weapons.

And it goes even further. The United Nations, that bastion of Anti-Semitism, has received word from Iran that it will not allow inspections. Does anyone really think the UN will do anything? It has never enforced sanctions in the past, preferring to look the other way any time sanctions have been ignored. Should the United States expect different behavior in the future?

Showing a clear contempt for Israel, Obama agreed in part with the UN Human Rights Council when it declared Israel the world’s leading human rights violator. Israel does not ban headscarves or minarets as certain other countries do. She welcomes Arabs who want to remain peacefully in Israel, bestowing upon them all the rights of an Israeli citizen. And contrary to what has often been alleged by the mainstream media, Israel allows all citizens to vote, including Arabs.

We now have Juan Williams attempting to ramp up animus between Jews and African Americans in the United States. In my mind we have already had enough of that. Leave it to Jesse and Reverend Al. Both the African American and Jewish people know that there are more agreements than disagreements. And as in Ferguson, outside agitators are there to spark unrest and lead it in the direction they want it to go.

The next step, and it didn’t take long was to blame Black anger on Republicans. I know it makes no sense, but that is to be the next talking point. Because John Boehner invited Israeli PM Netanyahu to speak to Congress and Republicans agreed, as they should have, Israel’s government is now an extension of the Republican Party, according to Williams. After all, it makes the security of Israel a partisan issue. I am still waiting for Williams or any other Leftist spokesman to explain why Obama had his people in Israel, busing in Arabs to vote against Netanyahu. ANYONE?

This administration has called Benjamin Netanyahu “chickens**t and lazy.” Obama has complained to Putin about having to deal with him, The Regime also called the Israeli PM “offensive and inappropriate” for slamming Kerry for being messianic, a word not used lightly in Israel.

And yet in Afghanistan, where we have spent more blood and treasure over that last three years than anywhere else, former President Mohammed Karzai accused American troops of the indiscriminate killing of civilians. He also claimed his country had gone backwards in the 12 years American and NATO troops have been present. Was there anyone in this Administration that condemned THAT speech? ANYONE?

And is it POSSIBLE that a nation stuck in the 8th century could even GO backwards?

Not a peep, not even a twitter.

Will anyone in the Obama Regime have Israel’s back, or will the only democracy in the Middle East have to go it alone? Can we get an answer on that from anyone? ANYONE?

Will the Senate threaten the 2nd Amendment?

The United Nations Arms Trade Treaty goes into effect on December 24th. Through that date, Coach is Right will provide background and current information concerning the dangers this treaty poses to the American people and their freedom.

President Obama has been re-elected since this piece was written and Republicans secured a massive, midterm victory in 2014. The midterm results should guarantee an incoming Senate that would  not ratify the Arms Trade Treaty. But conservative voters were certainly betrayed by the vote of the Republican House on the Omnibus Spending Bill a few days ago.

First published on July 13, 2012

by Doug Book,  staff writer

As New York City plays host to a conference which will shape the UN Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) into final form, most 2nd Amendment supporters are concerned that stealth language or overly broad applications woven into the document will serve to separate Americans from their right to keep and bear arms. After all, why else would preliminary versions of the Treaty be so difficult to obtain and U.N., pre-conference position statements remain consistently absent from the internet?  

Barack Hussein Obama leads the most anti-gun rights Administration in the nation’s history. Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano and recently appointed, ATF Acting Director B. Todd Jones have spoken often and passionately about the importance of implementing more restrictive gun control legislation.  

But the gun-grabbing Regime will not be able to ratify the UN’s global gun control measure without first securing a 2/3rds majority of senators to vote in favor. And it won’t be easy to convince 67 politicians to sign onto a document which countless critics have spent nearly a decade rightly representing as a worldwide assault on the 2nd Amendment. It will be especially difficult as the American public may once again be told that the document has to be “passed” in order to find out what’s IN it!

Late last year the Heritage Foundation obtained an ATT “Draft Paper” from an NGO participating in the Treaty mark-up. The Paper makes it clear that the finished product would be broad in scope, controlling everything “from rifle scopes to battleships.” And though the Treaty purports to monitor only “international arms transfers,” document language shows the UN also wishes to control “internal transfers” as “any firearm transfer—meaning any change in ownership…might conceivably somehow affect another nation…”

Therefore the ATT will demand signatories control and monitor “transfers including ‘transport’ across national territory.” To accomplish this, a nation would necessarily “maintain records of all imports and shipments of arms that transit their territory,” creating records on “the type of arms transferred and their ‘end users’.” So as international records would be kept of all weapons bought and sold within the United States, the Treaty would create not only a global arms registry, but the rules by which arms may be transferred and to whom.

Would Senators sympathetic to global arms control try to slip these and other unconstitutional ATT edicts past American voters? 

DC politicians—including Republicans—have already written purposely misleading and legally ineffective language into both the 2012 and 2013 National Defense Authorization Acts for the sole purpose of deceiving the American public into believing their constitutional rights were being looked after.  As for treaties, they commonly include “reservations;” that is, language designed to “define and limit the effect of a ratified treaty.” A few dedicated, gun-grabbing Senators might get the idea of attaching a codicil to the ATT, claiming it would prevent the ratified Treaty imposing upon the 2nd Amendment rights of the American people thereby safeguarding the right to keep and bear arms.

Of course they wouldn’t bother to inform Americans that the Arms Trade Treaty specifically forbids any reservations which are “incompatible with the object and purpose” of the Treaty! Would members of the Washington political class be so dishonest as to try such an underhanded stunt?

It’s doubtful that a sufficient number of Senators would risk the fury of the NRA and gun owning voters. But then, stranger things have certainly happened in the nation’s capitol.  After all, a Supreme Court Chief Justice has just prostituted both himself and the Constitution!

Maybe keeping tabs on the Senate wouldn’t be such a bad idea.


(1) http://www.nraila.org/media/PDFs/UNArmsTradeTreaty_USSenateLetter.pdf

(2) http://propheticnewsblog.blogspot.com/2012/07/un-arms-trade-treatyloosing-our-right.html

(3) http://patricksperry.wordpress.com/2012/07/10/the-u-n-arms-trade-treaty-will-restrict-your-gun-rights/

(4) http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2012/dc3364.doc.htm

(5) http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/12/effects-of-the-un-arms-trade-treaty-on-the-us