The clever use of timing by the slippery Mister Obama

By Suzanne Eovaldi, staff writer

 Timing is everything in politics, and the Obama White House has mastered this axiom like none other.  A motion to strike, (a win for Plaintiff Orly Taitz), was granted by the U.S. D.C. District Court in the same 24 hour news cycle Barack Obama appeared before the American people to declare a troop draw down in Afghanistan, (to send them  on the ground in Libya in September ??) thus burying a huge story of enormous constitutional merit.  The takedown and burial at sea of Osama Bin Laden “coincidentally” happened at the same time another eligibility case moved forward in May.

As Obama and his corps play the American people like a fiddle in their White House marching band, we are just learning the indefatigable Ms. Taitz, so mocked and scorned by the MSM, won her motion to enforce her Freedom of Information Act  request for Obama’s records, filed  with the Social Security Administration (SSA).

The befuddled SSA was so busy stonewalling the release of any information concerning her request for Obama’s social security application form that it even let filing dates pass, a real no no! 

Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states, “the court may strike from a pleading an insufficient defense. . .”  In her introduction, Taitz said, “something very strange is going on,” a stunning understatement indeed.  Now in an only in America twist, only the web site  is making this PUBLIC RECORD court case # 1:11-CV-00402 available so far on line.  Heavy copyright statements preclude actual release of what is being revealed there, but be assured THIS IS BIG!

 Taitz’ earlier case representing former U.S. Ambassador Alan Keyes et al is the bigger skein of the eligibility issue dogging Obama.  And this will just not die no matter how many millions Obama spends to stifle questions of  who he is and whether or not his birth and parentage qualify him to be our Commander in Chief and U.S. President. 

Taitz presented the court a 53 page pleading covering stunningly detailed forensic evidence by printer and graphics experts testifying to the cut and paste fraud and forgery inherent in the long form birth certificate released by the Obama White House during the Bin Laden news cycle.  From the binary-grayscale conflict to dropped pixels to obvious layering, Federal Court Judge Hon. Royce C. Lamberth heard a depth of investigative research not matched by the losing side. 

The multi-state travels of the Stanley Ann Dunham- Barack Obama family showed up in the pressure being put on Social Security Administration Commissioner Michael Astrue whose agency returned requests for the Obama ss # application with, “Sorry, your request cannot be processed at this time. . .”  so “Access Denied”  is the tune of the day!

 Are there a few good men and women out there in Congress to stand with this patriot Orly Taitz? 

Taitz describe Obama’s fraud as, “… the most serious breach of the U.S. national security since the creation of this nation,” what American patriot could disagree? 

Will you call toll free 1-877-762-8762 the following U.S. House members:  Darrell Issa, House Oversight; Mike Rogers, House Intelligence; Sam Johnson, House Ways & Means; Dana Rohrbacher, House Foreign Affairs.  Will you demand they stand with the truth?

 To contact your Congressional Representative use this link:

SOURCES:   by copyright

This day in history June 26

1870: Under the Administration of Republican President U.S. Grant, a Republican controlled Congress declared Christmas a federal holiday.

  If you are not receiving directly, please signup using the RSS feature on   the home page. It’s easy and always free.  In this world you may have knowledge or you may have repose, but you may not have both.  What have you done today to deserve to live in America?

 Comments on this or any other essay can be sent by following the posting instructions below

Be Sociable, Share!

23 thoughts on “The clever use of timing by the slippery Mister Obama”

  1. A conservative friend sent me this & i'd like to pass it
    along to you. Raymond

    My dog sleeps about 20 hours a day.
    He has his food prepared for him.
    He can eat whenever he wants, 24/7/365.
    His meals are provided at no cost to him.
    He visits the doctor once a year for his checkup, and again during the year if any medical needs arise.
    For this he pays nothing, and nothing is required of him.
    He lives in a nice neighborhood in a house
    that is much larger than he needs, but he
    is not required to do any upkeep. If he
    makes a mess, someone else cleans it up. He has his choice of luxurious places to sleep.

    He receives these accommodations absolutely free.
    He is living like a king, and has absolutely no
    expenses whatsoever. All of his costs are
    picked up by others who go out and earn a
    living every day.

    I was thinking about all this …… suddenly it hit me like a brick in the head …

    My dog is a damn Democrat

    1. Raymond! You continue to amaze, amuse, and educate all of us!
      What a brilliant analogy!
      Best wishes,

        1. Raymond; are you currently "active duty" or out of the service? One can't help to admire the military attire in the photo-art of your CIR ID. Is, or was, your branch of service the Marine Corps? If so, "Semper Fi".

          1. Hi Joanne,
            I was in the Marine Corps from 03/1972 – 03/1976.
            I'm 57 years old and semi-retired. My youth is long
            gone :-(

  2. We must demand the Term Political Correctness be separated from the state legislative process just as the left Demanded the Separation of Church from state process because this is why No Legislative Body will challenge this President on all the Un Constitutional Acts of Treason he has committed . Our Federal Government is hamstrung by its Own set of principles rather than staying within the confinements of the Constitutional Rules of Law that Govern FREELY and FAIRLY Everyone regardless of faith color or creed . Its because of the hesitation to Challenge a Politician over their use of or lack of Use of the US Constitution in Governing because of the Political Correct Climate thats been created in our political discourse over the Years is the reason we see a Congress thats Irrelevant in Up holding the rule of law , and at some Point this will lead to a Collapse of Judicial Preservation of the Rule of Law under the US Constitution and once this erodes into the allocation of Economic law we will see anarchy result and a Military Coup shortly after . This is like watching a Slow motion train wreck . We are watching other places in the world go though this NOW , so to think it wopn't come to the USA is foolish because we all are connected with this Global Economic System and tell me what happens when the Checks quit coming in the mail to all the SS retired vets , Retirees , let alone the states collapse like this Congressman says is going to happen If this sitting Congressman is saying this than we Must consider it truth ;

    Please read the debate here at this Link too . Its a Big deal .

  3. There is no confirmation of "Motion to Strike" being granted on Taitz website or on Post and email. Where did you get this information?

  4. No, the motion to strike was not granted. All that occurred was Orly filed a motion and a proposed order. If it does not have the judge’s signature and it is not shown on the court’s docket as “granted” then it has not been granted.

    Sloppy, sloppy research.

    1. Thank You sir, I appreciate the information – I could not get the "Sources" links to work and I monitor Post and e-mail and I didn't remember seeing it reported. I checked Post and E-mail and Taitz' website and there was not a report of this motion being granted – I don't know how to get access to the actual Court Docket (or I would have checked there myself). Thanks for the confirmation.

      1. One needs an account with PACER (Public Access to Electronic Court Records).

        Any diligent journalist would know to check the status at the court’s site before spewing tripe — er, publishing erroneous information like this.

      2. To All
        There were some problems with the links supporting this article. We apologize for those problems. The information about the motion being won by Orly Taitz came from her website: TAITZ V ASTRUE MOTION TO STRIKE THE ANSWER AND GRANT DEFAULT JUDGMENT
        Thank you

        1. In other words, “staff writer” Suzanne Eovaldi didn’t perform any research on this. She merely misinterpreted something that Orly Taitz posted on her blog.

        2. Taitz' Site does NOT confirm Motion to Strike was "GRANTED". The website indicates that Taitz filed a motion to do two things 1. Strike SSA's answer (because it was late) and 2. Grant default judgement in her favor because of the late answer – that's it – (Am I correct Real Lawyer)?

  5. The Defendants(SSA) "Motion to Strike" was granted/denied in part on 6/2/11. Atty. Taitz was ordered to refile her complaint with the SS#'s redacted.

    The last order from judge Lamberth was the "Scheduling Order" which gives the Defendants(SSA) 30 days to file any dispositive motions.

    The last motion filed by atty. Taitz was a motion to strike and answer to amended complaint. It has yet to be ruled on.

    All court filings related to Taitz v. Astrue can be found here:

    1. ORYR,
      Your certainly do have all the documentation and:
      Although you are correct RE: Taitz prevailing (partly) in SSA's motion to strike, (On or about 6/2/2011) author clearly refers to Taitz' motion to strike SSA's answer (Which came on or about 6/22/2011in the same basic "24 hour news cycle" in which Obama announced the Afghan troop drawdown). Check out the quote below:
      "A motion to strike, (a win for Plaintiff Orly Taitz), was granted by the U.S. D.C. District Court in the same 24 hour news cycle Barack Obama appeared before the American people to declare a troop draw down in Afghanistan…"
      I am not looking to berate anyone reporting on this issue (God knows we need folks who will do that) just looking to get the facts correct. The Current "Motion to Srike" (Taitz Motion) was filed 6/20/2011 (thanks ORYR) which is "in the same 24 hour news cycle Barack Obama appeared before the American people to declare a troop draw down in Afghanistan…" > Please correct me if this is incorrect.

  6. I'm disappointed that you chose not to post my factual correction of your article.
    Much like the MSM.
    I'm sorry to see you don't like to be corrected.

  7. Thanks for your diligent efforts to track down the truth. As you have acknowledged saying Taitz won at least a partial victory is correct. Nevertheless, saying we are "like the MSM" is off the mark. You don't get much in the way of explanation from the "MSM" but you do here; don't you? I hope you appreciate our efforts to post the best in 300 to 500 word conservative essays. Thank you for reading


  8. I'm used to lawyers and English professors modulating/what I had to go on in the interest of meeting Sunday's deadline was Pg # 8 (of entire 53 pg case) Taitz v Astrue Motion to strike the answer and grant default judgment was "Proposed Order Motion to Strike the Answer is GRANTED" Now we are seeing posted at… If you read the original typed decision with cursive write overs, you see some of this, some of that by the judge/ this was NOT available when I was posting/ so clearly Atty Taitz is moving the ball down the court/ she won some here/consider for months, years, courts and Congres dismissed anything to do with the eligibility issue/ plus several links brought up "video not available," access denied and so on/which seem to be apt comments on the entire controversy/ are you aware that one of the WH lawyers resigned the day after this came down?/ I appreciate your interest and questioning/ I seek to be accurate namely as an appellate, circuit court judge's daughter, English prof and journalist/ Most sincerely, Suzanne Eovaldi

    1. Suzanne, CIR and ORYR – God Bless you for all you do. Your article was written about Obama's timing NOT Taitz' victories. I was not arguing that Taitz had NOT won a "partial victory", I was pointing out that the "Motion to Strike" (SSA's answer) filed by Taitz on June 20, has not yet been "GRANTED". Obama's announcement of the troop drawndown during that news cycle did NOT cover ANY momentous event – That's all. I know you all are interested in getting an accurate story out there and I was simply pointing out what seemed to me to be an inaccuracy in the story. I obviously appreciate your efforts or I would not be reading your work with so much thought.


Comments are closed.