What witnesses testified to at Obama’s Georgia citizenship hearing

By Suzanne Eovaldi, staff writer

   “I’ve never seen anything like this,” Private Investigator Susan Daniels told Judge Michael Malihi under oath, as she reviewed her research into Barack Obama’s social security numbers investigation!

Her analysis centered on a Connecticut resident “born in 1890″ whose official registration somehow is mixed in with the Obama social security investigation.  Testimony at the court  hearing of Barack Obama’s eligibility to be placed on the Georgia ballot for reelection in 2012 revealed stunning sworn facts that clearly places into question the sitting president’s authenticity.

 In an interview after the administrative hearing, Daniels said, “I discovered immediately. . .( that social security number) was fraudulent. . .was..  no way it was accurate.”  The live internet video stream suddenly went black when she said, “He’s using a . . . “  While I was able to glean some startling testimony, other witness responses to Attorney Orly Taitz’s questioning seemed garbled and had certain interruptions at key moments of the proceedings.

 A remarkable source determined to bring the truth to the American people, namely htt://art2superpac.com, should allow you to view the hearing if it somehow can still stay up. 

Attorney Taitz’s first witness keyed in on the non-natural born citizen status of Barack Obama senior, a fact clearly stated by his son’s own words admitting his father was born in Kenya, a protectorate of Great Britain at the time of our sitting President’s birth.      Another forensic witness stated under oath that “1-the serial number is out of sequence 2-the (Nordyke) twins born after (Obama). . .their serial numbers are lower. . (you) would expect them to be higher. . .a certifying paragraph is different. . .the name of the registrar is different. . .(you) would expect the same (name) since they (twins and Obama) were born within 24 hours” of one another!   The forensic expert said, “There is credible evidence to warrant further investigation!”  Another computer scanner expert went through lengthy analysis of a soft wear creation of the birth certificate released last April as compared to a document simply scanned from the original.

 African American Pastor James David Manning is calling out officialdom for keeping the American people in the dark about this never before hearing of a sitting U.S. president’s eligibility challenge.  “This is a big story,” he says on his web video.  Pastor Manning says our media outlets, our Republican candidates, the Supreme Court, all members of Congress are involved in a “Conspiracy” (his words) to hide from us what is really going on. 

Dr. Jerome R. Corsi, author of several Barack Obama books, says Judge Malihi’s witnesses show “Barack Obama is slam-dunk-disqualified” to appear on the Georgia official 2012 ballot.   For him and his attorneys to not attend this official hearing was stunning.

Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp warned them  if “you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.”  One commenter said, “I demand to know if my president is legal or not, no fooling around.”  Perhaps the biggest news story of our country’s recent history is under blackout in an omerta or code of silence  unprecedented in journalism.

To contact your Congressional Representative use this link: http://www.contactingthecongress.org/

To read more use these links:

http://art2superpac.com

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/georgia-court-told-obama-slam-dunk-disqualified

http://atlah.org/2012/01/24/judge-orders-obama-to-court-media-conspiracy

Have you answered this week’s CiR.com poll?

“Don’t miss our new 3 minute “audiotorial” produced by Without a Helmet: On the Line with Emmett & Wiley.  Hear it now by clicking the play button on their logo on the lower right of my homepage!   

This day in history January 29

1850: Henry Clay introduced the Compromise of 1850 (which was a reaffirmation of slavery by Democrats) to the Senate.

In this world you may have knowledge or you may have repose, but you may not have both. 

What have you done today to deserve to live in America?

 Comments on this or any other coachisright.com essay can be sent by following the posting instructions below.

Be Sociable, Share!

37 thoughts on “What witnesses testified to at Obama’s Georgia citizenship hearing”

  1. It's a media "code of silence" alright, but it really isn't unprecedented. After all, the American media kept John Kennedy's womanizing a secret and would have done the same for Bill Clinton were it not for Drudge forcing the story out. The criminal adventures of Eric Holder could fill books, but they are available only on the web. The same goes for Hillary.

    Say, that's funny…these people are all liberal Democrats! Some coincidence, ain't it!

  2. You people are insane, racist and idiotic. Your "leader" Orly Taitz is certifiable and will be disbarred eventually with all these frivolous lawsuits. Why don't you all just shout out "There's a black man in the White House" it amounts to the same thing.

    1. Yeah, calling people names is always a more successful defense than addressing the facts to a progressive liberal socialist. Keep up the good work, you do a great job of representing the ill-informed and ignorant race-baiters trying to protect this president and his inadequacies behind a cloak of (non-existent) racial slanders.
      Ron Reale
      realetybytes

    2. Limeylizzie,

      Thank you for your comment. We who live in the conservative world of reality sometimes forget that loons like you actually exist out there, in spite of Obama's hourly TV appearances. That one of your sort is willing to embarrass herself so completely with the asinine comment you've just made reminds us just how important our job of removing you from power really is!

    3. Poor 'Lizzy. Does the "Limey" part mean you are from the great Liberal-England success? Your emotional rant has no logic. Would you have us be another England? And using the accusation of racist is old hat and only reveals ignorance.

    4. I guess the same people you call racists didn't like the socialist BJ (Bill Jefferson) Clinton because he was America's "first black president.'"

      1. And you same freaks claimed that Clinton had people secretly executed and was sending in black hawk helicopters to take your guns. Admit it – you're unhinged.

    5. Dear Limey
      We are trying to see that the law is followed, but to a sick liberal I guess that is insanity. Obama himself said his father was not an American citizen. The US Supreme Court in 1875 said to be eligible to be President you must have two parents who were born in America. Try thinking for a change. We don’t care about a “Black man in the White House” we care about a Marxist who hates America in the White House – stop projected your liberal constant race consciousness on those who want to follow American law.
      Coach

      1. Hi Coach
        You just wrote something that clicked for me. You said that the US Supreme Court in 1875 said to be eligible to be president, you must have two parents who were born in America. But I just realized that Romney is declaring that his father was born in Mexico. That would make him ineligible, right? Just curious. Oh, and I can't wait to kick out the imposter that we have today!

        1. That has been brought up but in Willard’s case his father was born to American citizens and so he was an American citizen. Unfortunately we’re not going to get rid of Willard that easily.
          Coach

        2. As long as both parents were American citizens AT THE TIME OF A CHILD'S BIRTH, that child is a "Natural Born Citizen." Where they were born is inconsequential.
          Of course, due to America not existing at the time, Washington and many other of our first Presidents could not have met this bar.
          Sorry to go there, but my mind can really tick me off sometimes, so I can imagine what I do to you guys!
          Ron Reale
          realetybytes

          1. Any child born in the US whose parents are members of an occupying army or the diplomatic corps is a natural born citizen. Why else do the conservatives froth at the mouth at the thought of "anchor babies?"

      2. Actually, the 1875 case you're referring to, Minor v. Happersett, was not about Presidential eligibility. It was a case about whether women could vote, and while it did say that there's no doubt at all that a person with two citizen parents was a "natural born," it also acknowledged that "Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents", and noting that "As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts." That's about as far from a definite declaration as you can get (EDIT: And of course, it was resolved by US v Wong Kim Ark in 1898)

        I'm glad, at least, to see that you accept the US Supreme Court as an authority on these matters. One might almost think that it might be significant somehow that the US Supreme Court has not considered any of the many birther cases worth hearing.

    6. You still just don't get it ! ! Orly Tiatz is NOT the only person calling Obama's citizenship into question. Where have you been? Have you NOT seen the video's of him confessing where his birth place is??? It's in HIS OWN WORDS! How dumb do you have to be and still be breathing?? Get a clue ! ! We have a treasonist in the White House, and it's people like you who are allowing it to continue.

    7. To LimeyLizzie…anyone who routinely and almost exclusively posts on Wonkette; then, out of bloody nowhere suddenly appears here and plants a "screed" against those of us who "don't feel the love" for your precious pet "Hopey" (that's what she calls Obama ). has a few ethical and moral screws lose. Her posts on Wonkette consist mainly of coarse and frequent foul language. You've got a following at Wonkette "LimeyLizzie" so may I suggest you return to your favored base of operation and leave CiR to the Conservative trash who find a huge difference between there being a "black man in the White House" and a "lying, Marxist, probably-ineligible-to-hold-office, "Caliph-in-Chief" man who happens to be black in the White House". Sounds to me as if you have "reverse discrimination" refined to an art form….
      Sorry no soliciting allowed here….take it down the street Madam Lizzie.

        1. Stuff a sock in it, Fare la Volpe…go on back to the muck and superficiality of Wonkette (along with Sorosbot, Limey Lizard, Soul Straw, and Dr. Ozark Z Hellbender)…
          While you provide us all with endless entertainment through your inane posts, and we will reply to you when we have the time (or when we feel so moved); you actually lend precious little to the dialog here….may I suggest you go to moveon.org where you can be with your own?
          As Progressive Socialists you may see nothing strange, unseemly, or pathetic in anyone substituting four letter words for actual content. This is a common affliction and problem for people whose ideas ( and the abilities to express those concepts ), have not matured beyond the tenth grade; or for those folks who prefer to parrot some canned script that's been handed to them by an overseer.
          We here at CiR prefer complete sentences to phrases coined from the Soros Manifesto.
          From what rock did you people crawl out from under?? Why the sudden, unwanted attention of Socialists to the CiR website? Have we struck a nerve? Do you actually believe you are "running interference" and protection for "The Lying-Caliph-in-the-Oval-Office" ? Because, if such is the case, I'm happy to inform you that your efforts are all for naught…we are neither impressed by your loyalty to a liar, nor are we interested in your opinions of, or on behalf of, Obama and the Socialist garbage you all spew.
          Can you REALLY be so myopic that you cannot see or admit that your standard bearer, B. O., is merely a shill, as you are, for George Soros?? How sad…..

    8. BTW, many Conservatives would love to see Allan West, JC Watts, Walter Williams, Thomas Sowell or many of the patriotic American Conservatives that believe in American Capitalism and the Constitution, elected president. Not because of the color of their skin, but because they believe in America.
      The color of someones skin does not impress us, it is the depth of their feelings for America, her greatness, and their desire to see her remain number one in the world, that we pay attention to.
      Ron Reale
      realetybytes

  3. They can't help it… liberalism was initiated in the 1940's to create a smokescreen for a thing called policitcal corruption. It worked so well that it developed into a disease… a mental disorder, of the Democratic Party. ~ Buck U. Ofama

  4. Limeylizzie you sound as though you are a little slimey in your denial that there is some legitimacy in these investigations. Evidently you are a part of the problem and wish to live under a Dictator and Dictatorial regime

  5. Obama needs his comeuppance. He has been given too many "passes" by an ineffectual Congress of wimps. He needs to be told, and made, to obey the Rule of Law the same as any other person. I hope the people will not give him a "pass" and will kick him out in 2012

  6. BLATANT NEGLIGENCE is what Obama has given us real USA citizens-I demand a damn refund!!!we need to confiscate that billion dollars- he owes us all more than that-he owes us an execution plus all the monies he wasted on purpose-how stupid does our government think each of us is?surely most of us know BORAX needs to go to jail then get executed for being a TRAITOR-but first he needs to pay up

  7. DO NOT CENSOR THIS POSTING!

    The issue is quite simple. To be President of the USA or to run for the Presidency of the USA, Obama must be a "natural born citizen" according to the Constitution of the USA. The term "natural born citizen" has been defined previously and it requires two conditions:
    1) Obama must be born in the USA.
    Obama's long form birth certificate that Obama has provided through the White House web site HAS BEEN DECLARED BY MANY EXPERTS TO BE SIMPLY A FORGERY!!!

    —Just a few links on the forged birth certificate that Obama released through the White House web site for those interested:
    –"Obama Birth Certificate Faked In Adobe Illustrator – Official Proof 1 ( Layers )" at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s9StxsFllY
    –"Adobe book editor positive: Obama certificate is phony" at http://www.wnd.com/2011/06/316749/
    –"Experts: Registrar stamps confirm Obama forgery" at http://www.wnd.com/2011/07/324153/
    –See evidence that Obama forged the birth certificate that was posted on the White House servers on 27 April 2011 (!!) at http://www.scribd.com/collections/3166684
    –See evidence that Obama is using a Social Security Number (SSN) 042-68-4425 that was not legally issued to him but to someone else (!!) at http://www.scribd.com/collections/3260742

    —Therefore, the only way to check this long form birth certificate is to go to Hawaii to check it directly. In particular, it is indispensable to assess if even this original long form birth certificate in Hawaii is truly genuine that is if it is not also a forgery to cover up for the possible fact that Obama might never have been born in Hawaii!!!

    2) Obama's parents MUST BOTH be American citizens.
    We know that Obama's father was a Kenyan and that he NEVER was an American citizen!!!!!
    Therefore, THIS SECOND CONDITION ALONE DISQUALIFIES OBAMA TO RUN FOR THE PRESIDENCY OF THE USA AND IT ALSO DISQUALIFIES OBAMA TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE USA, NO MATTER THE FACT THAT HE WON THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION!!!!!!

    FIRST CONCLUSION:
    —Obama is NOT a natural born citizen and therefore he is not entitled to run for the Presidency of the USA nor is he entitled to be President of the USA, no matter the fact that he won the Presidential election!!!!
    —Finally, Obama is a former lawyer and therefore OBAMA CONSCIOUSLY, INTENTIONALLY COMPLETELY DECEIVED THE ENTIRE AMERICAN PEOPLE BY RUNNING FOR THE PRESIDENCY OF THE USA WHEN HE KNEW PERFECTLY WELL THAT HE WAS NOT ENTITLED TO DO SO SIMPLY BECAUSE HE KNEW VERY WELL THAT HE WAS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, AS THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA REQUIRES ONLY ON THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA!!!!
    —THIS HUGE DECEPTION IS MORE THAN A FRAUDULENT ACT, IT IS WORSE THAN ANYTHING IMAGINABLE BECAUSE:
    1) IT RELATES TO THE HIGHEST POSITION IN THE LAND, THE PRESIDENCY OF THE USA, THAT OBAMA HAS FRAUDULENTLY OBTAINED;
    2) IT RELATES TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA BEING TRAMPLED UPON FRAUDULENTLY AND ILLEGALLY BY OBAMA;
    3) IT RELATES TO THE FACT THAT OBAMA INTENTIONALLY DECEIVED AND MISLED THE ENTIRE AMERICAN PEOPLE!!!
    ANY PERSON GUILTY OF SUCH SERIOUS FRAUD SHOULD AT LEAST GET A JAIL SENTENCE, NO MATTER THAT OBAMA HAS FRAUDULENTLY HELD THE POSITION OF PRESIDENT OF THE USA FOR A PERIOD OF TIME!!!

    DEFINITION OF A "NATURAL BORN CITIZEN":
    If you really want to have an expert legal explanation on what a "natural born citizen" truly is according to the Constitution of the USA and why legally speaking it is this way, then I suggest that you read at least a few articles on Attorney Mario Apuzzo's web site "Natural Born Citizen – A Place to Ask Questions and Get the Right Answers" at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
    In particular, read:

    1. Mike I can’t understand why you would think we would censor this post. If you are a CiR.com reader there should have been no question. If you are not and you are new here welcome aboard.
      Coach

    2. Sorry Mike, but you are somewhat incorrect. You said, "The issue is quite simple. To be President of the USA or to run for the Presidency of the USA, Obama must be a "natural born citizen" according to the Constitution of the USA. The term "natural born citizen" has been defined previously and it requires two conditions:

      1) Obama must be born in the USA."

      That is simply not true. John McCain was eligible to be President, but he was not born in America. "Natural Born" is based soley on the parental heritage, nothing to do with place of birth.

      be well,
      Ron Reale
      realetybytes

    3. Apuzzo? The lawyer whose career before this birther nonsense came up was defending people arresting for DUI? He's your Constitutional Expert? He's just barely a better lawyer than Orly.

    4. Nope. To be a natural born citizen, you have to either be born in the United States, or you have to have ONE parent who is a US citizen. Either qualifies. Because Obama's mother was a US citizen, the fact that he was born in the United States doesn't even matter; he could have been born on Mars and he'd still be a citizen.

  8. Mark my words…Obama will blow off this Georgia attack upon his eligibility…He will run in Georgia as he intended to do all along.
    If the ruling of this recent Georgia case goes against Obama, Georgia has no other recourse but to give Public Notice 30-90 days prior to the election, that all ballots cast for candidate Obama cannot and will not legally be tallied by the State.
    It would be quite ironic if Obama's arrogant, "you-can't-touch-me-I'm-the-President" routine wound up disenfranchising his own supporters in Georgia and in other courtrooms where similar issues regarding his eligibility are taking place.

    1. You are absolutely correct in what SHOULD happen in Georgia. We all hope for justice. Unfortunately, because of the corruption surrounding everything politicians touch, including judges, I fear someone will pull something out of their hat and make this case go away, too.
      After all he has spent, and the cover he has received to date, I think the odds are against us, but I live in hope. I could be wrong, but we all know how infrequently that happens, right? (I can almost hear you laughing from here!)
      Who runs the superior courts in Ga? Is there any reason to think they will stand up against the President? Can he force the issue into an expedited Supreme Court case, where he is already being protected?
      I don't think we have seen the depth of the machinations against the people and constitution available to obama and his alinskyites!
      Be well,
      Ron

      1. Ron Dear, you are so right…I laugh, but it is to keep from crying…the political cesspool includes the courts most certainly…but, like Diogenes with his lamp, I am still seeking the one honest man….Hopefully, the gentlemen in Georgia will bring all of us TWO honest men.
        You be well also, Ron !

  9. DEFINITION OF A "NATURAL BORN CITIZEN":
    If you really want to have an expert legal explanation on what a "natural born citizen" truly is according to the Constitution of the USA and why legally speaking it is this way, then I suggest that you read at least a few articles on Attorney Mario Apuzzo's web site "Natural Born Citizen – A Place to Ask Questions and Get the Right Answers" at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
    IN PARTICULAR, MAKE SURE YOU READ:
    —"The Natural Born Citizen Clause of Our U.S. Constitution Requires that Both of the Child’s Parents Be U.S. Citizens At the Time of Birth" at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/natural-born-ci

    SECOND CONCLUSION:
    —If you are a rational and honest person, no matter your political affiliation, you surely will be forced to conclude that the facts speak for themselves and that there is no doubt legally that a "natural born citizen" indeed requires that the President of the USA MUST HAVE two parents that were BOTH American citizens at the time of Obama's birth.
    —The Constitution of the USA is sacred to any American citizen AND it applies to every single American citizen, no matter one's political affiliation, no matter one's color of the skin, no matter what!!!!
    Therefore, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA IS UNDER THE RULE OF LAW LIKE ANYBODY ELSE (NOT ABOVE IT!!!) AND IN PARTICULAR OBAMA IS UNDER THE RULE OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA LIKE ANYBODY ELSE (NOT ABOVE IT!!!)!!!!
    —You now have the facts fully on the table concerning what a "natural born citizen" truly is, you cannot evade the truth about these facts!!!
    Now, what path are you going to choose?
    1) Keep Lying and hiding the facts, hoping that they will disappear by themselves!! Or
    2) Choose to acknowledge these facts fully and be determined to fight for the truth?
    The choice is yours! But the Constitution of the USA is at stake!!!

    CONCRETELY, WHAT CAN YOU DO IN YOUR STATE TO GET JUSTICE AND TO PROTECT THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA?
    1) Contact your governor, your senator, your elected representatives, the attorney general and any appropriate officials and ask them to put in place a legal process to ensure that Obama is on the ballot of your state ONLY IF OBAMA HAS PROVIDED ALL THE DOCUMENTS THAT WERE ASKED BY THE PLAINTIFFS IN THE GEORGIA CASE AND THAT OBAMA HAS REFUSED TO PROVIDE.
    More, plan also to ask full discovery on Obama's original long form birth certificate in Hawaii and on Obama's fraudulent social security that he uses.
    2) In case your state would not have appropriate laws to do what is indicated in point 1) just above, ask the appropriate officials in your state to create a law that will grant your state the same rights than the state of Georgia has to fully check a candidate BEFORE he is put on the ballot for any elections, in particular for the coming election for the position of President of the USA.
    To conclude:
    —IF THE STATE OF GEORGIA HAS A LAW TO FULLY CHECK CANDIDATES' REQUIREMENTS BEFORE THEY ARE PUT ON THE BALLOT FOR VARIOUS ELECTIONS, SO CAN YOUR STATE TOO!!!
    —YOUR ACTIONS LOCALLY IN YOUR STATE WILL ENSURE THAT THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA IS FULLY RESPECTED AND THAT NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW!!!
    —AS OBAMA THINKS HE IS ABOVE THE LAW BY NOT SHOWING UP IN COURT IN GEORGIA WHEN HE WAS REQUIRED TO DO SO, ONLY TO AVOID SHOWING THE DOCUMENTS THAT HE WAS ASKED TO PROVIDE THAT SURELY WOULD HAVE PROVED HIS LACK OF ELIGIBILITY TO BE ON THE BALLOT TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE USA, YOU THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAS A MORAL AND LEGAL DUTY TO MAKE SURE THAT THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA IS RESPECTED FULLY AND APPLIED FULLY TO ALL AMERICAN CITIZENS, ESPECIALLY TO OBAMA WHO BELIEVES THAT HE IS ABOVE THE LAW AS HE HAS RECENTLY DEMONSTRATED IN GEORGIA!!!

  10. Hey, I just thought of a really annoying question, and I will share it with you all:
    a) because misery loves company,
    b) maybe someone can answer.
    It seems to me that, like our Constitutional rights are given to us by God, a person's "Natural Born" status, based on parental citizenship, cannot be stripped.
    What if someone is born to American citizen parents, making them "Natural Born" citizens, renounces their "citizenship?"
    Could that person, as a citizen of another country, run for President? After all, they would still be a "Natural Born citizen" at time of birth.
    A "citizen" and a "Natural born citizen" are obviously two different things. One can be disavowed, but can the other?
    A sleazy lawyer could have a field day with this.
    I can disavow my right to free speech, and my right to own a gun, but I still have those rights.
    I can disavow my citizenship, but I will always have been a "natural born citizen."
    Isn't this fun?
    Ron Reale's twisted mind,
    realetybytes.com

Comments are closed.