By Suzanne Eovaldi, staff writer
Attorney Orly Taitz vowed to shove everything she had concerning Barack Obama’s evidentiary problem at last week’s eligibility challenge in front of Indiana’s election board. Taitz, whose airline ticket to the hearing was purchased by a concerned citizen presented evidence of a “stolen social security number and a forgery instead of a birth certificate!” She told WND reporter Bob Unruh that Indiana just removed their Secretary of State Charlie White for his discrepancies with voter registration irregularities over “minor” problems. Taitz said our sitting president’s eligibility problems are major in comparison.
But new questions about the status of BHO’s teen age mother Stanley Ann Dunham are surfacing as analysis at another web site is revealing a Congressional rule change for people born between December 23, 1952 and November 13, 1986 puts in serious doubt Stanley Ann Dunham’s ability to confer citizenship status on her son.
Since Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. was born in 1961, this newly discovered law involves Dunham’s age because she was only 18 at time of delivery! The law says:
”When one parent was a U.S. citizen and the other a foreign national, the U.S. citizen parent must have resided in the U.S. for a total of 10 years prior to birth of the child with FIVE of the years after the age of 14.” Stanley Ann Dunham did not meet requisite status according to blog discovery. One commenter said, “She was not old enough to register Obama’s birth in Hawaii or anywhere else in the U.S. as a Natural Born Citizen as she did not meet the residency requirements! Backing this statement up, another commenter reiterates:” The law specifically outlines the requirements for a CITIZEN mother to confer citizenship to her baby. Ann Dunham was NOT old enough-case closed!”
Judge Malihi in his pg. 6 footnote went back 20 years to cite Jill Pryor’s statement to the Yale Law Journal in which she said: “Despite its apparent simplicity, the Natural Born Citizen clause of the Constitution has never been completely understood.” Pryor goes on to begin her next sentence with the nonsensical anonymous pronoun IT: “It is well settled that Native Born citizens, those born in the U.S., qualify as natural born.”
Huh? Who is “It” Judge?
The WND analysis found the state Supreme Court of North Dakota over seventy years ago threw out of office a governor because his “lack of residential qualifications is a legal disability!” You can view the C-span video of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas telling Puerto Rican Representative Jose Serrno: “We’re evading that one!” when his questioner asked about the NBC clause. So a new angle enters the Obama NBC protest. While state and federal officialdom keeps ignoring American citizens, Attorney Orly Taitz who was born in the USSR and who fears her beloved naturalized country is heading toward the fate of Germany is keeping the controversy up on court dockets. If she and her other appeals colleagues get rebuffed on the birth father’s NBC issue, maybe they can start in on a new round of hearings using the birth mother’s status. They just won’t have President Obama’s own words telling them his father was NOT a U.S. citizen!
To contact your Congressional Representative use this link: http://www.contactingthecongress.org/
To read more use these links:
(1) (4)
http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/indiana-next-state-for-obama-eligibility-protests/
(2) (3)
http://www.hotstockmarket.com/t/64693/obamas-birth-certificate-verified-by-state/120
(5) from a CIR commenter:
http://yalelawjournal.org/images/pdfs/pryor_note.pdf
Have you answered this week’s CiR.com poll?
“Don’t miss our new 3 minute “audiotorial” produced by Without a Helmet: On the Line with Emmett & Wiley. Hear it now by clicking the play button on their logo on the lower right of my homepage!
This day in history February 29,
1993: Four federal agents were killed in Waco Texas, after they tried to serve an arrest warrant for weapons charges on Branch Davidian sect leader David Koresh, starting a 51-day standoff.
In this world you may have knowledge or you may have repose, but you may not have both.
What have you done today to deserve to live in America?
Comments on this or any other coachisright.com essay can be sent by following the posting instructions below.


It appears to me that everything about Obama is a lie. His personal history is guarded by his attack dogs and everything that has come out of his mouth has been one sort of a lie or another. He cannot tell the truth of himself and his intentions because people would not accept him. His early years were set in a Muslim country. His early schooling was in a Muslim school. Finally he was raised in his grandparents' communist household and his godfather was a communist. His young-man-travels are shrouded in mystery. For twenty years he attended a communist congregation calling itself a religious church that preaches hatred of America!
His HOPE is to CHANGE, as much as he can, everything that is AMERICAN!
He is a 'constructed' ideologue dedicated to Marxism replacing the Constitutional freedoms that America have enjoyed for over two centuries with his idea of a "brave New World".
No thank you, Mr. Obama!
AMEN!!!!!!
To "Kid Richie"….I think you have very ably summed up how most of us in this website view ObaMao, with the noted exception of Marxists who drop in occasionally to see if they can muddy otherwise crystal clear waters.
There is no law which compels Americans to like, respect, trust or believe any president….especially THIS one….but there ARE laws forbidding Treason, sedition, unconstitutional usurpation of powers belonging exclusively to Congress, the States, and sovereign American citizens which bind Obama….Someone ! Explain to me why these laws are not being enforced against Obama.
BTW "Kid" have you ever noticed how the Marxist snakes visiting this website emerge in writhing, hissing mode whenever any mention of Obama's ineligibility to hold office is mentioned here? If 'ya like to go 'plinking' for varmints…I suggest you arm yourself .
I used to give him the benefit of the doubt about where he was born but no longer. His birth certificate has a serial number out of sequence for the date he was born as compared to the Nordyke Twins. He got a fake number through his family contacts that found a stillborn kid and stole it, not figuring anybody could compare the date of that stillborn to the Nordyke twins.
There would be NO REASON to do that unless he weren't born in Hawaii.
Not Suzanne, Not Orly, Not Bob Unruh, Not Dean Haskins, Not WND, Not Joe Farah or all the King's horses and all the King's men can revive this corpse. It is as dead. Dead as a doornail.
FLVoter…in your dreams, pal, in your dreams…that's the only place where this issue will remain "dead as a doornail"
Yet another absurdity from the Birthers. Obama was born in Hawaii and so is an American citizen. It wouldn't have mattered if his mother was 12.
Show me one schoolbook that was ever produced in the US that mentioned the two-citizen-parents-for-presidents-only rule.
This is for “Guest”
Way to go Sherlock! You caught us making up a federal law.As the bright light like you are you KNEW no such law exists – boy we can’t put one over on you can we?
Now go show this to the staff at the home and get your extra fruit cup at dinner tonight.
This is for Fl Voter
FL I thought you could read. If I’m wrong about that trying having someone read the piece to you. I call your attention to the discussion about federal law.
Coach
"Way to go Sherlock! You caught us making up a federal law.As the bright light like you are you KNEW no such law exists – boy we can't put one over on you can we?
Now go show this to the staff at the home and get your extra fruit cup at dinner tonight."
Translation: I'm embarrassed at my own stupidity.
Gee you have such a apt user name.
Coach
Guest : For far too many generations the Liberal intelligencia (read : Socialist dogmatists), have controlled the content of American schools' text books…the result being the "dumbing-down" of America's children through the public school systems….additionally, the Nat. Educ. Assoc. further completes the indoctrination of our children in manners totally unacceptable and inappropriate for government run education….so take your Socialist, revisionist schoolbooks and jam 'em……they mean absolutely NOTHING to this topic under discussion…they are as tainted by Marxist dogma as you are.
Coach, does this Congressional Rule Change only apply to those born abroad or would it have also affected his birth if it was the U.S.?
Excuse my typo in the above post Coach. My apologies. Let me do this again. Does this Congressional Rule Change only apply to those born abroad or would it have also affected his birth if he was the U.S. also?
Thanks
It's only for people born abroad, as a 10-second Google search reveals. This isn't a "newly discovered law," birthers have been talking about for years. They've mostly stopped because it's so easy to debunk. (If he was born in Kenya, that'd be a different matter.)
Joe V…….since WHEN is your name "Coach"??? This question was NOT directed to you for answer. "A Politician" was requesting confirmation from the sources of the article…not from you.
Seriously, Joanne? Does it say somewhere that this forum is only for comments made directly to the author? If so, I apologize–it's unlike any other unmoderated online forum I know, then. If not, then find something better to do and mind your own business.
Joe V. : I reiterate…"A Politician" directed his/her question to "Coach"…there is ample room and time for you to comment once the question has been answered..
here is the law in effect at the time of Obama's birth, as so stated in the eligibility challenge just filed in PA: "under laws in effect between 12-24-1952 & 11-14-1986 to one citizen parent and one foreign national, the US citizen parent had to be physically present in US for 10 yrs prior to child's birth and FIVE of those years after age 14." go to http://usjf.net/2012/usjf-and-philip-berg-file-ag… for the case law on this/we have a new post coming out probably tomorrow on the PA challenge/this was pt 4 of a 19 pt argumentation/ also stated in the challenge is this: "No person except a NBC or citizen of US at time of adoption of this Consitution shall be eligible to the office of Pres." Article II, Sect. 1, Clause 5/ stay tuned/ Suzanne E.
Does this apply to birth ONLY in the U.S. at the time he was born or does it apply ONLY if a person was born in a foreign country like Kenya for example? Or is it both? We need a confirmation which one it is.
Are you really this cotton picking dumb? It would not have mattered if she were 10 years old. THIS 'RULE' WOULD ONLY APPLY IF SHE WERE BORN ABROAD! Sheesh…you birthers are quite something.
Once again Cordwainer Smitth…an obvious alias…your name is NOT Suzanne Eovaldi or "Coach"…so keep your obamanoid-controlled mouth
shut…or the power-that-be-here will ban you.
O.'s mother was not 18. She was 17 and according to law she had to be 18. His grand mother was in the room in Indonesia when he was born and she testified so. She was a Christian. Then his father was married prior to Obamas? birth but if so where is the divorce papers?
No. The story goes that his grandmother witnessed the birth in Mombassa, Kenya, not Indonesia where he later resided to in 67. There suppose to be a tape of her saying this.
A Politician….there IS, or was a tape testifying that Obama's grandmother witnessed his birth in Kenya…there is also a sworn affidavit from an episcopal minister that he made that phone call to Obama's Grandmother confirming her witness to Obama's birth.
A Politician…if you listen to the tape, she is talking on the phone through an interpreter. The caller asked her a leading question about whether she was present when Obama was born, and she answers 'yes.' But immediately after, she says several times that she misunderstood, and that Obama was born in America, in Hawaii, and that she wasn't present. The caller deceptively edited the tape of the call to suit his purposes.
for A Pollitician-we know what's wrong with you. Liberalism
is a mental disorder and you are afflicted with the deadly
disease. The result-"my mind's made up-don't confuse me
with the facts" Careful there-it could be terminal about 12 November and be real disatrous on 20 January. If we can't
get rid of the imposter before the, he can join the rest of the
Chicago hoodlums in January. It sure is good to be on the
WINNING TEAM!
Joe V…why don't you go on over to the Democratic underground website where courtesy and posting etiquette are unheard of. Seems to me you'd fit right in. No one is barring you from anything Meathead….it's only your self-importance that's getting in the way of courtesy.